Channel
@aaaaimthinkinggg
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
207subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001579122367 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aaaaimthinkinggg |
| Description | I am either right or wrong. |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aaaaimthinkinggg |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 207 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:54 | 207 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 13 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
47 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 19 | 40.4% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 31.9% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 12.8% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 4.26% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 4.26% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 4.26% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 2.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 13 January 2025 to 18 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
I had an absence due to priorities in my own personal life, and since then I took a long break away from crypto and away from charts. I am not fully caught up, but realized fears lately are quite overblown — yet they are well justified. Bearish flashing trading indicators and Bitcoin Treasury company blowups aside, bottoms take time to form. Right now the biggest factor in this drop is deleveraging, not just in cryp…
👍14❤1
What if...
🔥6
Personally don't think QE will happen this cycle, but gradual reduction of QT is enough.
Market consensus for QT to decelerate around June, based on current US Federal Reserve estimates. Semi-good news as markets are forward thinking. Another pre-emptive signal will likely come from China in early March when they release their plans for monetary policy, growth and stimulus and combatting Trump tariffs. Expectation is priced for the worst, but I believe it will not be as bad, alleviating market tension t…
🔥4
https://t.me/joescrypt/37596
👍1
TOTAL3/BTC aka "Alt szn" is approaching key pivot area soon. The outlook and general sentiment for alts is down bad, but this chart tells a different story. 7 year range in the making, on the verge of a potential recovery. For minor reference, XRP has broken its 7 year bull flag and LTC is expected to follow soon. MAs have not been this compressed since early 2021. Are you a bulliever?
This is not the time to be bearish.
😁6👍3
Photo, posted without a caption
This is not the time to be bearish.
💯2💔1
AI should bottom or start to bounce in the next 1-2 weeks. It's time to start paying attention on-chain, rather than on macro.
🔥1
Tribedotrun looks interesting. I thought this was a scam DM at the time :/ I wish them well on their social experiment.
👍1
Just shedding some perspective on something Vitalik wrote 3 years ago: https://x.com/VitalikButerin/status/1479501366192132099/photo/1 As the years have gone by, the gradual phase for new ideas and emerging blockchain use-cases has become noteworthy, but few have proven to show staying power. This has swung the pendulum back in favor of originality and stability, swaying from liberated mass activity to a limited rad…
🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @aaaaimthinkinggg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Thinking Out Loud” (@aaaaimthinkinggg), 207 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aaaaimthinkinggg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.