Channel
@a_akhramenko
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
175subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001063532778 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @a_akhramenko |
| Description | Журналист. Моя биография: https://akhramenko.com/обо-мне Написать в личные сообщения: @akhramenko |
| Created | Between 1 May 2016 and 28 February 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/a_akhramenko |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:02 | 175 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:21 | 175 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 14 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
69 reactions across 8 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🙈 | 11 | 15.9% | |
| custom 5355194605971188716 | 7 | 10.1% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 10.1% | |
| ❤ | 6 | 8.70% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 8.70% | |
| custom 5357135076490494866 | 5 | 7.25% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 7.25% | |
| 😐 | 4 | 5.80% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 4.35% | |
| 🤬 | 3 | 4.35% | |
| custom 5366562615604564448 | 2 | 2.90% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 2.90% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 2.90% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 2.90% | |
| custom 5206492775075295242 | 1 | 1.45% | |
| custom 5463365839812049891 | 1 | 1.45% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 1.45% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 1.45% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 14 January 2026 to 26 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @a_akhramenko. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 January 2026 to 26 February 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
SMM сегмент с прочей медийкой тоже решили добить Только и останется постить в «Одноклассники» и ВК рерайты от ИИ. https://t.me/rbc_news/143705 Всё прокатывает и идёт по курсу.
🤬3custom 53571350764904948663👍1🤗1
Статья в КП сегодня
🙈8custom 53551946059711887161custom 53665626156045644481
Решили, что всякие ухищрения людям все равно приходится переключать, чтобы зайти только в приложения типа Госуслуг и банка С новой блокировкой «ничего не поменяется», поэтому заблокируем людям самый удобный способ общения вне лифта и парковки. Умники. https://t.me/bazabazon/44143
👏4❤🔥3❤2
Russia is restricting access to Telegram in an attempt to force its citizens to switch to a state-controlled app built for surveillance and political censorship. 8 years ago, Iran tried the same strategy — and failed. It banned Telegram on made-up pretexts, trying to force people onto a state-run alternative. Despite the ban, most Iranians still use Telegram (bypassing censorship) and prefer it to surveilled apps. …
👍3👏2🔥2custom 53571350764904948661
Наши СМИ уже активно переходят на ИИ, новости вместо людей пишут боты Не могли проверить, где находится пансионат, что Троицк уже не область и даже как называется.
😐4🤯2custom 53551946059711887162😱1🙈1
💰Биткоин продолжает падать Стоимость криптовалюты 6 февраля достигла 16-месячного минимума, ненадолго приблизившись к отметке в $60 000. Разница с октябрем 2025-го в 2 раза.
custom 53551946059711887163😭2😱2
💚На прошедшей неделе отметили памятную дату. 29 января 2007 года, 19 лет назад, город получил звание наукограда Российской Федерации. И уже дважды, в 2012 и 2017 годах, успешно подтверждал это звание в составе Москвы. Статус действует до 2032 года. ☕️Новая Москва сложно переживает аномальные снегопады. Несколько дней подряд на неделе пассажиры были вынуждены выходить из автобусов и идти пешком до метро из-за сильных…
❤4👍3❤🔥2
Поездки в Америку теперь точно всё. UPD: США приостанавливают выдачу только иммиграционных виз, а не всех в целом — Fox News исправил свою статью.
🙈2🍾1custom 52064927750752952421custom 53551946059711887161custom 53571350764904948661custom 53665626156045644481custom 54633658398120498911
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @a_akhramenko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Канал Александра Ахраменко” (@a_akhramenko), 175 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/a_akhramenko.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.