Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ألسن | 🌐

@a_1kii

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

468subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002755539985
TypeChannel
Username@a_1kii
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/a_1kii

Growth

4684724706 August 2026 — 472 subscribers7 August 2026 — 472 subscribers14 August 2026 — 468 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 467–473 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 00:58468-4
7 Aug 2026, 12:41472no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:17472first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 16 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

12 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
758.3%
325.0%
👍18.33%
🔥18.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 November 2025 to 6 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Feb 2026, 15:59 UTC228 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

حَصيلتي من #Volka_English: أنَّ سِر الطلاقة ما يكمن في رتابة القواعد وإنما في "المُدخلات المفهومة" والمحاكاة الواقعية؛ والحلو أن فولكا ما يقدم دروس أكاديمية جافة كثر ما أنه يعيشك تفاصيل يومياته الكندية ليرسخ عندك المفردات الأكثر شيوعاً، فإذا أنتم تحبون تعيشون اللغة في سياقها الحيّ وتكتسبون اللسان بذكاء هذي القناة هي وجهتكم. 🎥 | رحلة في مَدارات اللغة: https://youtube.com/@volkaenglish?si=PBtXavaYblCE9Pvz

2

3 Feb 2026, 12:04 UTC276 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

يسرّ دورة بروكا الترحيب بكم لتعلم اللغة الإنجليزية بأسلوب عملي وواضح أيام الدراسة: من الأحد إلى الخميس الوقت: من الساعة ٦ إلى ٨ مساءً منهجنا في بروكا يقوم على أسس بسيطة وفعّالة: 1) تصنع منهجك بنفسك نمنحك مساحة لاختيار الموضوعات الأقرب إلى واقعك، مثل نمط الحياة، الغذاء الصحي، الملابس، أو الروتين اليومي، لتكون المحادثات مرتبطة بحياتك اليومية وليست مفروضة عليك. 2) تركيزنا الأساسي على المحادثة والتحدث هدفنا أن تصل إل

1

3 Feb 2026, 12:04 UTC204 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

مساء الخير للي حاب يطور لغته بالانجليزي من خلال قصص واقعية للبيع للتطوير ، للتعليم ، للتدريب ارسل لك الملف ٣٠ ريال مترجم للتواصل 0500594865

26 Dec 2025, 13:31 UTC333 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

لقيت قناة اسمها Langfocus، شفت تحليلهم للغات الصعبَة والسهلَة وكيف تطوّرت اللغات وتاريخها العَجيب، والحلو أنهم مو مكتفيين بالدروس كثر ما أنهم متعمقين وجدًا في بنية اللغات (نحو، صوتيات، تاريخ)، ف إذا أنتم تحبون الـ[لماذا] ورا اللغات وكيف يعمَل العالم اللغوي، هذي القناة بتناسبكم

51🔥1

5 Dec 2025, 14:42 UTC396 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

موقع رهيب ومجاني للتدريب على الايلتس اكتشفته بالغلط، هو عبارة عن كتب كامبريدج أصلًا لكن بطريقة تفاعلية بحيث يحاكي الاختبار (بقسم التحدث والكتابة يقيمك كمان)، مره مفيد خصوصًا لو الإختبار محوسب jumpinto.com‎ - من حساب وديان على منصة X xWedyanFawaz

1👍1

16 Nov 2025, 15:59 UTC373 viewsread 6 August 2026

اذا كان عندكم اي سؤال في ما يخص [Mixed Conditionals] ارسلوا هنا @Akii1_bot وانا بجاوب

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @a_1kii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Nov 2025, 15:57 UTCAnonymous Quiz17 voters

جملة Mixed Conditional صحيحة هي:

  1. A) If she didn’t eat much, she wouldn’t get sick yesterday.12%
  2. B) If she had eaten less, she wouldn’t be sick now.71%
  3. C) If she has eaten less, she isn’t sick now.18%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Nov 2025, 15:56 UTCAnonymous Quiz16 voters

If they had listened to the instructions, they ______ any problems now.

  1. A) wouldn’t have69%
  2. B) don’t have19%
  3. C) wouldn’t have had13%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Nov 2025, 15:55 UTCAnonymous Quiz19 voters

أي جملة صحيحة من ناحية الصياغة والمعنى؟

  1. A) If he saved money, he would be rich now.47%
  2. B) If he had saved money, he would be rich now.37%
  3. C) If he saves money, he will be rich now.16%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Nov 2025, 15:54 UTCAnonymous Quiz15 voters

If she had left earlier, she ______ stuck in traffic now.

  1. A) wouldn’t be73%
  2. B) wouldn’t have been20%
  3. C) isn’t7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 November 2025 to 6 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 598,341 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ألسن | 🌐” (@a_1kii), 468 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/a_1kii.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.