啵啵 pinned a photo

Channel
啵啵 服务系🍼
@a1213xxr
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
202subscribers
+57 since we began measuring on 27 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003925252590 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @a1213xxr |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 5 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 27 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/a1213xxr |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 03:37 | 202 | +56 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 146 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 145 | no change |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:30 | 145 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 112.4%
- avg views ÷ 202 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 227
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 5
- of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (5 August 2026 – 27 August 2026) |
| Views total | 908 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 13s
- Average length
- 7s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
回来了回来了,29号可约😘
Photo, posted without a caption
要快乐 不止七夕吖😘
休息中,期待相见😘
【时间】:2026-08-07 【老师】:#啵啵 【留名】:匿名 【人照】:9.5 【颜值】:9 【身材】:9 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:10 【综合】:9.58 【过程】:开局叠甲,只代表个人观点,不构成任何CJ建议! 位置好找,奈何这个位置没去过,LS告诉有地下停车场,绕两圈也没找到,结果停在隔壁街走回来看见地下停车场入口了,日! 首先一点确定不是代聊,已验聊天记录,没得问题。人照差别微乎其微,年龄30左右,皮肤白,胸大,态度好。问需不需要丝袜,对那个东西无感,遂作罢。口的无齿感,毒🐉顶到根儿,胸夹小头正正好好very nice⬆️⬆️⬇️⬇️⬅️➡️⬅️➡️BABA结束战斗。
【时间】:2026-08-07 【老师】:#啵啵 【留名】:匿名 【人照】:10 【颜值】:10 【身材】:10 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:9 【综合】:9.83 【过程】:人照没啥差距,皮肤白🐻发,再说这服务直接干蒙了,太绝了,毒🐲回春体验感超棒,细节不说了词穷,来就对了
最后一天约课喽😘
【时间】:2026-08-06 【老师】:#啵啵 【留名】:匿名 【人照】:9.9 【颜值】:9.9 【身材】:10 【服务】:10 【态度】:9.9 【环境】:10 【综合】:9.95 【过程】:cj啵啵老师,从啵啵老师上榜就开始关注,今天终于抽出时间来,按照指引上楼,人跟照片基本一致,皮肤特别白,胸大大的,手感很好。特别提示的是老师的服务,重来没有过这种体验感,处处是惊喜,专属毒🐉,前列腺保养,回春特别值得体验,口更不用说了,绝了,啪啪的时候各种姿势,最难忘的是那个身上的360的旋转,直接蒙了,老师还可以rj,不多说了就是爽,无脑冲
【时间】:2026-08-06 【老师】:#啵啵 【留名】:Dio 【人照】:10 【颜值】:9 【身材】:10 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:10 【综合】:9.83 【过程】:9
【时间】:2026-08-06 【老师】:#啵啵 【留名】:ymerwang 【人照】:10 【颜值】:10 【身材】:10 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:10 【综合】:10 【过程】:二刷啵啵老师,依然是进门大雷伺候!今天因为比较疲劳,让老师给洗了个澡,很有越南龙宫残废浴的感觉。没感受过的可以来试试,比出国方便哈。全程情绪价值给足,能够根据我的要求调整服务,这点我觉得是群里比较顶的👍 重点提一下上次出击提到回春,老师做完让下次体会效果,果然有用啊,这次的状态就好一些 😘看不懂的自学一下,这一口回春确实见效,期待下次见面。
【时间】:2026-08-05 【老师】:#啵啵 【留名】:滴滴 【人照】:10 【颜值】:10 【身材】:10 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:8 【综合】:9.67 【过程】:这么久第一次写车评,含金量就不用多说了,但是必须重点说一下这个毒🐉还有回春,我只能说夯爆了,无脑冲就行了,兄弟们
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @a1213xxr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“啵啵 服务系🍼” (@a1213xxr), 202 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/a1213xxr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.