导航分类,点击直接跳转 叠词+1 - 叠词+字 - 叠词+1 1 - 叠词+1 2 点击直接跳转
❤1
Channel
@a0u0u
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003867147487 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @a0u0u |
| Created | 18 July 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/a0u0u |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 18:01 | 3 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:46 | 3 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (18 July 2026 – 18 July 2026) |
| Views total | 1,101 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 18:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 18 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
导航分类,点击直接跳转 叠词+1 - 叠词+字 - 叠词+1 1 - 叠词+1 2 点击直接跳转
❤1
1
1
1
1
11
1
1
字+叠词11 @baikeke 188 白可可 @banjuejue 138 班珏珏 @beiqianqian 138 贝芊芊 @bikunkun 138 毕坤坤 @bingtaitai 188 冰太太 @bofengfeng 168 博峰峰 @bohuohuo 168 博火火 @bupeipei 138 布佩佩 @caokoukou 138 曹扣扣 @caoxiuxiu 168 曹秀秀 @chiyanyan 168 池妍妍 @dailanglang 138 戴琅琅 @daojiujiu 168 道九九 @denglala 168 邓拉拉 @didongdong 138 狄东东 @erwenwen 138 尔文文 @gaiyinyin 168 盖茵茵 @gaiyiyi 168 盖依依 @gaonini 188 高妮妮 @genlili 168 亘莉莉 @gongxinxin 168 龚欣欣 @guaguoguo 188…
叠词+字 @chuchuqi 128 出出气 @duduqi 128 赌赌气 @lubinbin 138 卢彬彬 @nongnongde 128 浓浓的 @pipinao 128 皮皮闹 匹匹诺 @shenshendi 138 神神帝 @wawabi 168 娃娃币 🛫🛫🛫🛫 回到导航 🛫🛫🛫🛫
叠词+1 2 @bianbian2 78 便便2 @bianbian3 78 便便3 @bianbian4 78 便便4 @bianbian7 78 便便7 @biaobiao4 138 彪彪4 @chongchong0 98 冲冲0 @chunchun0 168 春春0 @chuochuo1 98 绰绰1 @cuancuan0 78 窜窜0 @cuocuo2 78 错错2 @cuocuo5 78 错错5 @cuocuo9 78 错错9 @daodao5 98 刀刀5 @diaodiao6 168 屌屌6 @duanduan5 78 端端5 @enen4 298 恩恩4 @fangfang0 178 芳芳0 @gaogao0 78 搞搞0 @geigei4 98 给给4 @gengen4 78 根根4 @guangguang3 168 光光3 @gungun1 78 棍棍1 @huanghuang9 168 皇皇9…
叠词+1 1 @bianbian5 78 便便5 @bianbian6 78 边边6 @biebie4 78 憋憋4 @biebie8 78 别别8 @cengceng0 78 蹭蹭0 @cengceng5 78 层层5 @cengceng6 78 蹭蹭6 @cengceng7 78 蹭蹭7 @chaichai4 78 柴柴4 @chongchong7 98 冲冲7 @chuaichuai0 78 踹踹0 @chuaichuai2 78 踹踹2 @chuaichuai4 78 踹踹4 @chuaichuai9 78 踹踹9 @chuanchuan4 168 川川4 @chuangchuang5 168 闯闯5 @chuangchuang9 168 闯闯9 @chuchu4 138 楚楚4 @chuichui4 98 锤锤4 @chuichui7 98 锤锤7 @chuochuo3 98 绰绰3 @chuochuo5 98 绰…
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @a0u0u. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 2,983 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@a0u0u named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“叠词+1数字” (@a0u0u), 3 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/a0u0u.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.