Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Over Thinking.

Channel

Over Thinking.

@Ziad207

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

114subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001193730705
TypeChannel
Username@Ziad207
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 October 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 6 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/Ziad207

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 43% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1141201176 August 2026 — 120 subscribers9 August 2026 — 120 subscribers13 August 2026 — 119 subscribers20 August 2026 — 118 subscribers29 August 2026 — 116 subscribers5 September 2026 — 115 subscribers25 September 2026 — 114 subscribers6 August 202625 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 50 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 113–121 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 22:58114-1
5 Sept 2026, 17:17115-1
29 Aug 2026, 00:07116-2
20 Aug 2026, 23:48118-1
13 Aug 2026, 15:59119-1
9 Aug 2026, 04:16120no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:46120first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 October 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 December 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

154 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😢8454.5%
❤5837.7%
💔95.84%
🥰31.95%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 154 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 October 2022 to 14 December 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Dec 2022, 08:14 UTC557 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026

وحشتوني جدا يا صحابي❤️❤️❤️

❤10💔4🥰3

11 Oct 2022, 17:01 UTC669 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026

دي آخر مسدچ هتنزل على التشانيل هنا يصحابي، اللي حابب يخرج يخرج خلاص مفيش محتوى تاني ولا اي حاجة، اشوفكم على خير✨

😢9💔5

11 Oct 2022, 17:00 UTC664 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

٢٠٢٢/١٠/١١' تركني حبيبي وتركتني الدُنيا ولم أعد أنا كما كُنت أنا وزالت الدُنيا.. تعديل: ٢٠٢٣/١/٤ هزيمة اخرى وخسارة جديدة.. ٢٠٢٣/٣/١٢.. 2023/4/11.. هزيمة جديدة' 2023/4/17.

😢12

9 Oct 2022, 22:44 UTC570 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

"تنامين لا تدرين ما ليلُ ذي الهوى وما يفعل التسهيدُ بالهائم الصبِّ." - العباس بن الأحنف.

😢6

9 Oct 2022, 12:52 UTC295 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

يعود الإنسان راغبًا في الأنس، وأن يعانق بحرارة -وللعناق ألف طريقة- وألا يقال له: لست وحدك، وإنما يقال له: إني معك. - يوسف الدموكي.

❤8

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Ziad207. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Over Thinking.” (@Ziad207), 114 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ziad207.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.