5 measurements spanning 31 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 176–183 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Sept 2026, 13:02
177
-3
1 Sept 2026, 05:12
180
-1
17 Aug 2026, 20:06
181
-1
11 Aug 2026, 03:53
182
no change
11 Aug 2026, 00:46
182
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
9s
Average length
9s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
65 reactions across 6 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5348515794386965901
33
50.8%
custom 5296536751551045763
10
15.4%
custom 5242372382110267834
9
13.8%
custom 5210950869524177651
4
6.15%
custom 5366243856016763495
4
6.15%
custom 5363837012178659786
3
4.62%
❤
1
1.54%
🤩
1
1.54%
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️
К сожелению я забросила этот тгк, из-за нехватки времени и некоторым проблемам, а также у меня пропал интерес вести каждый день этот канал. Скоро начнется учеба, я в этом году поступаю и у меня тем более не будет времени.🐾
Кроме этого тгк, у нас есть ещё тик ток и лайк, которые я веду более активнее, раз в неделю там точно выходят видео. Ниже оставлю ссылки на них.👅
Надеюсь хотя бы редко, но буду тут по…
🖋🖋🖋🖋🖋🖋🖋🖋🖋🖋
📧что будет, если собака понюхает отраву ?
📌Если собака только понюхала отраву, тяжелое отравление маловероятно - летальная доза обычно требует попадания яда в системный кровоток. Однако слизистые оболочки носа пронизаны кровеносными сосудами, поэтому вдыхание высокотоксичных веществ или ядовитых газов может вызвать реакцию.
📌Последствия зависят от типа вещества:
1. Раздражающие вещества (хлорка, кислота…
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @Zhulya_dog731. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Уютная_будка_Жули🐾” (@Zhulya_dog731), 177 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Zhulya_dog731.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
