Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for For Zhao Yufan

Channel

For Zhao Yufan

@ZhaoYufq

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

258subscribers

+33 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003739635803
TypeChannel
Username@ZhaoYufq
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ZhaoYufq

Growth

225258241.57 August 2026 — 225 subscribers8 August 2026 — 225 subscribers8 August 2026 — 227 subscribers15 August 2026 — 258 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 220–263 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 19:23258+31
8 Aug 2026, 19:22227+2
8 Aug 2026, 10:20225no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:31225first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
62.2%
avg views ÷ 258 subscribers
Avg views / post
160
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held12 (4 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,925
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 12 we hold a reading for · 42%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ZhaoYufq. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 17:32 UTC17 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @cortluvSticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

7 Aug 2026, 17:07 UTC21 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @byexstellaPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

7 Aug 2026, 17:07 UTC19 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @byexstellaPhoto

6 August,2026 for_evercherry10 Instagram post Stay pretty, my girls🎀🤍

7 Aug 2026, 16:50 UTC19 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @MiyelogyPhoto

︎ ㅤ « 🤩 _ ︎I 🤩 - ⿻ 𝕃᧐᥎ᥱ ︎ ︎ ︎︎ 🤩 ︎yσᥙ ᥎ᥱry 🗯 - ︎︎︎ா🤩 ㅤ ׁ🤩 ᥲᥣѡᥲℽs ( ல - 🤩 ) ︎ ︎ ︎︎ ︎︎– 🤩 ” 🤩 ⲙᥙch ン. 𝔸ᥒɗ # 🩹

7 Aug 2026, 16:50 UTC17 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @MiyelogyPhoto

ᅠᅠ𓏸⃘⿻ ✨ * ve - ry ( 🤩 - 🤩 ) 𝒲ant – « 💜 :: ை’ 🤩 [ 🕊 ㅤ ℜ * 🤩. 𝓃ot _ ( !! ) 🎤 🌟 _ ℐ 💜 ℒo - ve 🤩 » Y 🌟 – 🔵 𝒴ou ⿻ [ 🤩

7 Aug 2026, 16:46 UTC67 viewsread 8 August 2026

оп на 5-20 пм 1:1 - 2:2 бс писать @sonhaeq если бан @ZhaoYufBot

7 Aug 2026, 08:22 UTC239 views0 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

20260807 Weverse Update @.chaotic NEW YORK!!!!!!! To those who jumped till the whole place is shaking To those who screamed and barked To those who chanted and sang using every single drop of their energy To those who dressed up looking awesome To those who swayed their light sticks from end to end To those who shook the place and made the lights go out And at last To those who enjoyed themselves and had the time of

Signed lián

7 Aug 2026, 04:12 UTC235 views0 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

20260807 Instagram Update @.cortis 코캉스 같이 잘 즐겼어요? 🏖️

6 Aug 2026, 06:25 UTC505 views0 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

20260806 Instagram Update @.cortis we on Canadian soil and the energy in Toronto ain't normal ❤️‍🔥

5 Aug 2026, 12:41 UTC545 views0 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

20260805 Weverse Update @.chaotic Toronto!!!! To those who jumped their asses off To those who screamed at the top of their lungs To those who sang every single word no matter the language To those who danced like there's no tomorrow To those who banged their heads until their face turned bright red To those who held their light sticks as high as they could And at last To those who immersed themselves and had the tim

Signed lián

4 Aug 2026, 18:41 UTC225 views0 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

CORTIS 'MOTION (feat. Juicy J)' Official Visualizer Photo Sketch

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @ZhaoYufq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 387,033 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“For Zhao Yufan” (@ZhaoYufq), 258 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZhaoYufq.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.