Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Zero O' Clock | ⩇⩇:⩇⩇

Channel

Zero O' Clock | ⩇⩇:⩇⩇

@ZeroOclock_000

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

767subscribers

+41 since we began measuring on 11 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002451475494
TypeChannel
Username@ZeroOclock_000
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 September 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ZeroOclock_000

Growth

726767746.511 Sept 2026, 05:47 — 726 subscribers11 Sept 2026, 06:22 — 726 subscribers12 Sept 2026, 09:58 — 767 subscribers11 Sept 2026, 05:4712 Sept 2026, 09:58
3 measurements spanning 1 day, net +41. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 720–773 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 09:58767+41
11 Sept 2026, 06:22726no change
11 Sept 2026, 05:47726first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 22 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.52%
avg views ÷ 767 subscribers
Avg views / post
50.0
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
19.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 September 2026
Posts held14 (22 March 202610 September 2026)
Views total150
Reactions total25
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Sept 2026, 06:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

186 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10355.4%
❤‍🔥3418.3%
🔥2111.3%
🐳1910.2%
💔94.84%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 186 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 22 March 2026 to 10 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Sept 2026, 06:15 UTC35 views8 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

❄️🍂 𝑇𝑟𝑢𝑠𝑡 𝑦𝑜𝑢𝑟𝑠𝑒𝑙𝑓 𝑖𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑧𝑒 𝑊ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑤𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑆𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑤𝑖𝑙𝑙 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒 𝑎𝑔𝑎𝑖𝑛 .𖥔 ݁ ˖ 𝒶𝓃𝓈𝓌𝑒𝓇 𝒷𝓎 𝒷𝓉𝓈

3❤‍🔥3🔥2

3 Sept 2026, 13:30 UTC91 views17 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

🌟 "𝑌𝑜𝑢 𝑐𝑎𝑛'𝑡 𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑝 𝑚𝑒 𝑙𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑛' 𝑚𝑦𝑠𝑒𝑙𝑓."

10❤‍🔥4🐳2🔥1

8 Jul 2026, 15:59 UTC245 views8 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

𝙸'𝚖 𝚏𝚎𝚎𝚕𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚓𝚞𝚜𝚝 𝚏𝚒𝚗𝚎, 𝚏𝚒𝚗𝚎, 𝚏𝚒𝚗𝚎 𝙸 𝚠𝚒𝚕𝚕 𝚛𝚎𝚙𝚎𝚊𝚝 𝚒𝚝 𝚝𝚘 𝚖𝚢𝚜𝚎𝚕𝚏, 𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚛 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚛 𝙴𝚟𝚎𝚗 𝚒𝚏 𝙸 𝚌𝚘𝚕𝚕𝚊𝚙𝚜𝚎 𝚊𝚐𝚊𝚒𝚗 𝙸’𝚖 𝚏𝚒𝚗𝚎 ​𝙸'𝚖 𝚏𝚒𝚗𝚎 ⁱ'ᵐ ᶠⁱⁿᵉ ᵇʸ ᵇᵗˢ

8

24 May 2026, 15:06 UTC368 views18 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

“𝐼’𝑚 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑜𝑛𝑒 𝐼 𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑙𝑑 𝑙𝑜𝑣𝑒 𝑖𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑤𝑜𝑟𝑙𝑑 𝑀𝑦 𝑠ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑠𝑒𝑙𝑓, 𝑚𝑦 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑢𝑠 𝑠𝑜𝑢𝑙 𝑁𝑜𝑤 𝐼 𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑦 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑒 𝑖𝑡, 𝑠𝑜 𝐼 𝑙𝑜𝑣𝑒 𝑚𝑒...𖹭 𝐸𝑣𝑒𝑛 𝑖𝑓 𝐼’𝑚 𝑎 𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑡𝑙𝑒 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡,𝐼’𝑚 𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑙𝑙 𝑠𝑜 𝑏𝑒𝑎𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑢𝑙 𝐼’𝑚 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑜𝑛𝑒 𝐼 𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑙𝑑 𝑙𝑜𝑣𝑒.” .𖥔 ݁ ˖ ℰ𝓅𝒾𝓅𝒽𝒶𝓃𝓎 𝒷𝓎 ℬ𝒯𝒮.

❤‍🔥75🐳3🔥3

4 May 2026, 10:16 UTC330 views15 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

🍃🕯 𝑊𝑒 𝑤𝑎𝑙𝑘𝑒𝑑 𝑡𝑜𝑤𝑎𝑟𝑑𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑒 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑐𝑒 𝐵𝑢𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑐𝑒 𝑏𝑒𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑒 𝑜𝑢𝑟 𝑒𝑛𝑑 𝐴𝑙𝑡ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑔ℎ 𝑤𝑒 𝑢𝑠𝑒𝑑 𝑡𝑜 𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑘 𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑁𝑜𝑤 𝑤𝑒 𝑏𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑘 𝑒𝑎𝑐ℎ 𝑜𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑦 𝐴𝑙𝑡ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑔ℎ 𝑤𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑤𝑒 𝑑𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑒 𝑑𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑚 𝑇ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑑𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑚 ℎ𝑎𝑠 𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑦 𝑏𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒 𝑎 𝑑𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑚 𝑀𝑦 ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑡 𝑖𝑠 𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑛, 𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑠𝑒 𝑏𝑢𝑟𝑛 𝑖𝑡 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑎𝑑 𝑆𝑜 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑝𝑎𝑖𝑛 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑡, 𝑛𝑜𝑛𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑤𝑜𝑢𝑙𝑑 𝑏𝑒 𝑙𝑒𝑓𝑡 𝒯𝑒𝒶𝓇 𝒷𝓎 𝒷𝓉𝓈

7❤‍🔥3🔥3🐳2

26 Apr 2026, 13:29 UTC274 views14 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

🎼 𝐼𝑓 𝑤𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑛'𝑡 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝑓𝑒𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑠 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑒𝑎𝑐ℎ 𝑜𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟 𝐼𝑓 𝑤𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑛'𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑘 𝑜𝑓 𝑒𝑎𝑐ℎ 𝑜𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟 𝑊𝑜𝑢𝑙𝑑 𝑤𝑒 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑔𝑒𝑑 𝑖𝑡 𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑙𝑖𝑘𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑠? 𝑁𝑜𝑤 𝑖𝑓 𝑤𝑒 𝑑𝑜𝑛'𝑡 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑦 𝑓𝑒𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑠 𝑙𝑒𝑓𝑡 𝐼𝑡'𝑠 𝑑𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑠, 𝑑𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑠 𝑜𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑤 𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑝 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑘𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑚𝑒 𝒯𝓇𝒾𝓋𝒾𝒶 轉 : 𝒮𝑒𝑒𝓈𝒶𝓌

4❤‍🔥4🔥4🐳2

19 Apr 2026, 13:41 UTC261 views8 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

🦋 𝑌𝑜𝑢 𝑘𝑛𝑜𝑤 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝐼 𝑐𝑎𝑛'𝑡 𝑆ℎ𝑜𝑤 𝑦𝑜𝑢 𝑚𝑒, 𝑔𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑦𝑜𝑢 𝑚𝑒 𝐼 𝑐𝑎𝑛'𝑡 𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑤 𝑦𝑜𝑢 𝑎 𝑟𝑢𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑑 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑦𝑠𝑒𝑙𝑓 𝑂𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑎𝑔𝑎𝑖𝑛 𝐼 𝑝𝑢𝑡 𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑘 𝑜𝑛 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑔𝑜 𝑡𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑒 𝑦𝑜𝑢 𝐵𝑢𝑡 𝐼 𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑙𝑙 𝑤𝑎𝑛𝑡 𝑦𝑜𝑢 𝒯𝒽𝑒 𝒯𝓇𝓊𝓉𝒽 𝒰𝓃𝓉𝑜𝓁𝒹

8

16 Apr 2026, 14:44 UTC241 views26 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

🌌~ 𝐼𝑓 𝑜𝑛𝑙𝑦 𝑎𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝐽𝑢𝑠𝑡 𝑎 𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑡𝑙𝑒, 𝑜𝑛𝑙𝑦 𝑎 𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑡𝑙𝑒 𝑚𝑜𝑟𝑒 𝐼𝑓 𝐼 ℎ𝑎𝑑 𝑑𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝑡𝑜 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑏𝑒𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑒 𝑦𝑜𝑢 𝑊𝑜𝑢𝑙𝑑 𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑦𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑏𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑛𝑜𝑤?  𝒯𝒽𝑒 𝒯𝓇𝓊𝓉𝒽 𝒰𝓃𝓉𝑜𝓁𝒹

11❤‍🔥4🐳4🔥4💔3

9 Apr 2026, 08:13 UTC255 views24 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

🕯💜 𝑰 𝒘𝒊𝒔𝒉 𝒍𝒐𝒗𝒆 𝒘𝒂𝒔 𝒑𝒆𝒓𝒇𝒆𝒄𝒕 𝒂𝒔 𝒍𝒐𝒗𝒆 𝒊𝒕𝒔𝒆𝒍𝒇... 𝑭𝒐𝒓 𝒚𝒐𝒖, 𝑰 𝒄𝒐𝒖𝒍𝒅 𝒑𝒓𝒆𝒕𝒆𝒏𝒅 𝒍𝒊𝒌𝒆 𝑰 𝒘𝒂𝒔 𝒉𝒂𝒑𝒑𝒚 𝒘𝒉𝒆𝒏 𝑰 𝒘𝒂𝒔 𝒔𝒂𝒅.. 𝑭𝒐𝒓 𝒚𝒐𝒖, 𝑰 𝒄𝒐𝒖𝒍𝒅 𝒑𝒓𝒆𝒕𝒆𝒏𝒅 𝒍𝒊𝒌𝒆 𝑰 𝒘𝒂𝒔 𝒔𝒕𝒓𝒐𝒏𝒈 𝒘𝒉𝒆𝒏 𝑰 𝒘𝒂𝒔 𝒉𝒖𝒓𝒕 𝑰 𝒘𝒊𝒔𝒉 𝒂𝒍𝒍 𝒎𝒚 𝒘𝒆𝒂𝒌𝒏𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒆𝒔 𝒄𝒐𝒖𝒍𝒅 𝒃𝒆 𝒉𝒊𝒅𝒅𝒆𝒏 𝑰 𝒈𝒓𝒆𝒘 𝒂 𝒇𝒍𝒐𝒘𝒆𝒓 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒄𝒂𝒏'𝒕 𝒃𝒆 𝒃𝒍𝒐𝒐𝒎𝒆𝒅 𝒊𝒏 𝒂 𝒅𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒎 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒄𝒂𝒏'𝒕 𝒄𝒐𝒎𝒆 𝒕𝒓𝒖𝒆 ℱ𝒶𝓀𝑒 𝓁𝑜𝓋𝑒

14💔4❤‍🔥3🐳3

7 Apr 2026, 13:09 UTC242 views21 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

🦋🫧💜 𝑻𝒆𝒍𝒍 𝒎𝒆 𝒊𝒇 𝒎𝒚 𝒗𝒐𝒊𝒄𝒆 𝒊𝒔𝒏'𝒕 𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒍 𝑰𝒇 𝑰 𝒔𝒉𝒐𝒖𝒍𝒅𝒏'𝒕 𝒉𝒂𝒗𝒆 𝒕𝒉𝒓𝒐𝒘𝒏 𝒎𝒚𝒔𝒆𝒍𝒇 𝒂𝒘𝒂𝒚 𝑻𝒆𝒍𝒍 𝒎𝒆 𝒊𝒇 𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒔 𝒑𝒂𝒊𝒏 𝒊𝒔𝒏'𝒕 𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒍 𝑾𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝑰 𝒘𝒂𝒔 𝒔𝒖𝒑𝒑𝒐𝒔𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝒅𝒐 𝒃𝒂𝒄𝒌 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒏? 𝒮𝒾𝓃𝑔𝓊𝓁𝒶𝓇𝒾𝓉𝓎 𝒷𝓎 𝒱

14🔥3❤‍🔥2🐳2

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @ZeroOclock_000. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Zero O' Clock | ⩇⩇:⩇⩇” (@ZeroOclock_000), 767 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZeroOclock_000.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.