Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Zereno's Gallery πŸ†βœοΈ

Channel

Zereno's Gallery πŸ†βœοΈ

@ZerenoArtChannel

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Polls Β· Cite this entry

378subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001667991221
TypeChannel
Username@ZerenoArtChannel
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ZerenoArtChannel

Growth

3743783767 August 2026 β€” 376 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 376 subscribers13 August 2026 β€” 375 subscribers20 August 2026 β€” 374 subscribers28 August 2026 β€” 378 subscribers7 August 202628 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 21 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 373–379 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 00:19378+4
20 Aug 2026, 02:25374-1
13 Aug 2026, 11:23375-1
8 Aug 2026, 06:17376no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:57376first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 26 December 2025 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
49.5%
avg views Γ· 378 subscribers
Avg views / post
187
1 post measured
Reaction rate
5.88%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held18 (26 December 2025 – 30 July 2026)
Views total187
Reactions total11
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 06:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

201 reactions across 17 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀11657.7%
πŸ”₯4321.4%
❀‍πŸ”₯188.96%
πŸŽ‰83.98%
πŸ₯΄41.99%
πŸ€”31.49%
😈20.995%
😱20.995%
🀯20.995%
😍10.498%
πŸ™10.498%
🀬10.498%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 201reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 26 December 2025 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 20:24 UTC187 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

New auction πŸ‘‰ https://www.furaffinity.net/view/65857343/ TW post: https://x.com/NotZerenoArt/status/2082925738068525400

❀8πŸ”₯3

22 Jul 2026, 15:50 UTC357 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

I'll resume with the homo art eventually people, don't fret. I'm just expanding my horizons.

πŸ”₯3😈2

22 Jul 2026, 15:45 UTC345 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

https://x.com/NotZerenoArt/status/2079955993320992828

❀14πŸ”₯3😱1

21 Jul 2026, 18:15 UTC306 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❀10πŸ”₯4

10 Jul 2026, 20:37 UTC457 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

woman

❀11🀯2πŸ”₯1😍1

7 Jul 2026, 18:42 UTC445 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Es insalubre lo que hacen estos tipos

πŸ€”3❀2🀬1

1 Jul 2026, 14:46 UTC488 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

More testing

❀‍πŸ”₯6❀3πŸ”₯1

30 Jun 2026, 01:05 UTC481 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Found out how to "hack" making pixel art. Although I still have to refine the process a bit more.

❀16πŸ”₯4😱1

19 Mar 2026, 06:43 UTCβ‰ˆ1,430 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Anyway, which do you think looks best?

  1. A38%
  2. B48%
  3. Both?13%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❀1

19 Mar 2026, 06:41 UTCβ‰ˆ1,310 viewsread 8 August 2026

I know the point of pixel art is to work with a limited color palette, but I always end up wanting to add some blur to the shading and small color variations.

19 Mar 2026, 06:36 UTCβ‰ˆ1,290 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Pixel art / low res painting test

❀7

9 Feb 2026, 05:04 UTCβ‰ˆ1,360 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Drawpile is a good option when I don't have SAI

❀6πŸ”₯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ZerenoArtChannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Mar 2026, 06:43 UTCFinal Results52 voters

Anyway, which do you think looks best?

  1. A38%
  2. B48%
  3. Both?13%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only β€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 26 December 2025 to 30 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind β€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œZereno's Gallery πŸ†βœοΈβ€ (@ZerenoArtChannel), 378 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZerenoArtChannel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.