Channel
@Zenith_HC
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
16subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003792890157 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Zenith_HC |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 18 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Zenith_HC |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:30 | 16 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:47 | 16 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (18 June 2026 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 82 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 22:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
17 reactions across 12 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 11 | 64.7% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 29.4% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 5.88% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вы когда-нибудь задумывались о море? Об океане? Как бывало за всю историю человечества, можно сказать, это единственное место, которое осталось в этом мире почти нетронутым глобальными катаклизмами(при этом, к сожалению, человек всё ещё считается слишком особым глобальным катаклизмом..), в сравнении с тем, что стало с остальными зонами. И он всё ещё внушает уважение. И не только умиротворяющим воем бушующих, брызгающ…
🔥1
К слову о снах(уж простите, я люблю разговаривать). На деле мне редко снятся сны, в сравнении с той же F-913. Я "вежливо попросил" систему сильно не злоупотреблять этим. Но временами что-то странное и неожиданное решает спонтанно поставить меня перед фактом
🔥1
Самое страшное, что меня как такового в этом сне не было, и я мог только наблюдать. Это печальнее всего. Будто хочешь дотянуться до чего-то, но не можешь, потому что это тебе недоступно
❤1🔥1
Полностью с тобой согласен. Я крайне не люблю забывать вещи. Даже те, которые мне помнить не совсем приятно. Но это... Я, пожалуй, как можно дальше отодвину От этого испытываешь не физический страх, а экзестенциальный-
❤1🔥1
Ты даже Эши не пощадила, представляешь
Sticker, posted without a caption
Обычно мне снятся нейтральные по окраске сны. Но сегодня приснилось, как ты вырезала весь Сумато. Мне не понравилось. Страшное, гиппереалистичное зрелище в подробностях. После такого люди обычно в поту просыпаются-
Так интересно получается, когда ты вовек никому не нужен был, а потом как по щелчку пальца всем понадобился А знаете почему так? На весь этот избитый недальновидными решениями человека мир, парадоксально, я единственный механизм, присспособленный к выживанию в тяжёлых условиях. При этом где-то 85% мира оцениваются как критически опасные зоны. ... Практически весь свой длительный жизненный цикл я провёл в этих усло…
🔥1
Обижаешь. И давай лучше не умирать, ладно? Не важно, считаешь ли ты себя излишне душной или нет
🔥1
Киборг говорит, что тесты прошли более-менее нормально, поэтому с этого момента я иду устанавливать голову F-913 обратно. Пожелайте ей удачи. Вроде бы, утечек не было, но удача здесь лишней точно не будет-
🔥1
Как и ожидалось, результаты вышли... Не совсем предсказуемыми. Перегрев дошёл до порогов критических значений. Игнорировать мы такое, соответственно, не можем. Сами понимаете, если аккумулятор перегружается и нагревается просто потому, что существует, это не дело — носитель такими темпами просто взорвался бы, рискуя подобным взрывом принести действительно непоправимые разрушения F-913 пришлось временно отключить, по…
Мы с Киборгом посовещались и решили, что будем использовать для этого дела кварцевые проводки: с ними, как он говорит, можно работать. Соответственно, дозу света мы будем подавать небольшую, даже мизерную в соотношении с общим объёмом, я бы сказал Мы уже успели убедиться в том, что неизвестно, как данная энергия может себя повести — даже такое количество может стать опасным. Но раз Фоли настаивает, то нам остаётся л…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Zenith_HC. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 581,974 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Z-073” (@Zenith_HC), 16 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Zenith_HC.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.