Channel
@Zcc16168
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
517subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003987034595 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Zcc16168 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 5 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Zcc16168 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:41 | 517 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 517 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (5 July 2026 – 23 July 2026) |
| Views total | 7,939 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 03:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
【深圳花满楼】 https://t.me/szhmll 【验证时间】：2026-07-23 【老师名字】：晓晓 【老师账号】：@xxby08 【验证留名】：🐟 【人照相似】：9 【颜值身材】：8.8 【服务评分】：8 【态度评分】：9 【课室环境】：8.2 【体验过程】：约课沟通舒适，到了科室，已经留好门，小妹妹非常嫩，素颜清纯可爱，有点古灵精怪，爱笑。脱光光，坦诚相见后，比较害羞。一起沐浴，互相洗白白，妹子太嫩了，🐻B，正常肤色。爱爱服务方面，是新人，但是口活没有齿感，简单调情，后换我服务小妹妹，可以kiss，小穴周边剃了毛毛，乳头非常小，爱爱的时候非常害羞，会闭着眼轻哼，各种姿势配合。看着妹子清纯可爱的脸，加上紧致的小穴出水。出完水一起沐浴，不爱爱的时候妹子没有那么娇羞了，开始有点大大咧咧起来，挺好玩的。 预览消息(正式发送时没有本行)。
❤1
夜生活出击报告（ https://t.me/SZYSHDBG ） 工兵留名：气运之子 老师花名：#宝安区晓晓(08年刚下海） 出击时间：7.19 地理位置：#宝安 上课支出：800P 服务内容：对课表08年字眼半信半疑，上门地址是个高档公寓酒店，开门后探出古灵精怪的小妹妹，一边震惊一边感叹真得好小好嫩，像是未成年，妹妹自称高中刚毕业，脸蛋胸前下面都好可爱。笑起来很妩媚，感觉那是世界上最美好的东西。亲吻时明显对方还不是很熟练，待调教状态。口得很舒服，下面特别紧，像名器，全程硬得要命直到出水。 体验打分：8/满分10.0分 联系方式：@xxby08 免责声明：以上报告内容为当事人主观感受，并不构成出击建议；出击有风险，来都来了需谨慎
❤1
🎉🎉🎉 开奖通知 🎉🎉🎉 🔖 防伪编号：H178437993436 🎰 宝安晓晓 @xxby08 半价优惠劵 ⚠️ 抽奖说明： ‼️中奖者私聊老师兑换 ‼️需要24小时内确认中奖 ‼️开奖三天内兑奖 ‼️过期无效 ‼️无效回收积分兑换 ‼️兑奖需要提交报告 ‼️炸号者中奖作废(中奖前后) ‼️转让需要老师同意 ‼️中奖不去私聊 @Fire5inhole 💁 参与情况：14达标 / 32报名 🔋 人品加成：45票 ⚡️× 9 🎅 联系领奖：@xxby08 1. 无情打桩机⚡️× 9 奖品：宝安晓晓 @xxby08 半价限P 祝大家心想事成好运连连！
晓晓08兼职🉑上门 pinned a photo
💐💐💐开奖了💐💐💐 【骑士团☆ 晓晓 半价活动】开奖了 本期总参与人数：56 少女币加成数：2 1、五代雄介（消息数29 加成数0）获得：半价p 兑奖请联系 @xxby08 谨祝中奖用户大吉大利万事如意 更多资讯请关注
晓晓08兼职🉑上门 pinned Deleted message
https://t.me/szysh01
深圳蟹堡王出餐报告 https://t.me/szxwb 验证留名: 半夜不睡觉 上课时间: 7/2 位置坐标: 宝安西乡 老师花名: 晓晓 上课花费: 800P半价券 联系方式: @xxby08 服务内容： xcz，🐍，69 上课过程：中了晓晓妹妹的半价本来约了上周五的课，奈何老师红休只能改期，今天老师回复今天开课就立马约上了。按照时间到达遥控上楼，一眼见到老师就看出来妹妹很嫩，刚满18岁，付了水费先休息了一会，然后开始洗澡。妹妹还没有发育完全，全身嫩嫩的。洗完上床，先聊了会天然后开始亲妹妹的胸，然后下面，下面完全没有味道。之后改成妹妹口，妹妹口的感觉很好，只是她有点不太喜欢，所以口的时间有点短。最近有点纵欲过度，刚口硬的弟弟又软了，妹妹又帮弟弟手搓了一会，还是不起来，本想着就和妹妹聊聊天的，妹妹很渐聊，时不时的笑了笑，聊了人生，聊了理想，就这么聊了半个小时，弟弟搓了搓又起来了，果断带上小雨伞开始传…
【深圳金玺】：https://t.me/SZJXQ 【出击时间】：2026-07-19 【老师昵称】：晓晓 【联系方式】：@xxby08 【学生留名】：干中学 【人照相似】：9 【身材评分】：8 【服务评分】：9 【态度评分】：9 【环境评分】：9 【综合评分】：8.8 【过程描述】：二次返食晓晓，第一次因为纵欲过度，半天小弟弟找不到状态，最后草草出水。这次修养好了，准备和晓晓一番激战。这次换了课室，比上次的好点，隔音也好多了。老师还记得我上次表现不佳，这次一定要爽到位。一起陪浴，洗完上床，老师嫩妹技术待开发，还是要靠自己操盘。先亲老师的熊，接着转移到下面，老师的阴蒂被我甜的鼓鼓的硬硬的，看小弟弟状态梆硬，果断带上小雨伞开始，这次老师比上次放开了点，也是隔音好了点，可以听到老师的娇喘声，但是老师依然还是闭着双眼，紧紧拽着枕头床单，老师的技术还有待开发，但是是真的嫩啊，喜欢嫩妹的直接冲。
🎰 宝安晓晓 @xxby08 半价优惠劵 📮 参与条件： 🌏️ 归属地 广东 🪪 必须设置用户名 🎫 加入-晓晓08兼职🉑上门 🎫 加入-深圳出击俱乐部认证榜 🎫 加入-深圳出击俱乐部 └ 🎟️ 发言数大于 40 条 🎁 奖品内容： 💰️ 宝安晓晓 @xxby08 半价限P × 1 ⚠️ 抽奖说明： ‼️中奖者私聊老师兑换 ‼️需要24小时内确认中奖 ‼️开奖三天内兑奖 ‼️过期无效 ‼️无效回收积分兑换 ‼️兑奖需要提交报告 ‼️炸号者中奖作废(中奖前后) ‼️转让需要老师同意 ‼️中奖不去私聊 @Fire5inhole 🔋 人品加成：⚡️× 9 规则 📅 开奖日期：(北京时间) 2026年07月21日 14时30分00秒
🎟️ 抽奖标题：宝安晓晓老师上榜半价大放送 📪抽奖说明：中奖者机器人会发送中奖信息 1. 获奖学生兑奖请联系 ： @xxby08 2. 奖品自开奖时间起5天内有效； 3. 炸号者中奖作废； 4. 发奖人在发奖前请仔细核实获奖者信息，以防奖品被冒领造成不必要的损失； 5、未尽事宜解释权在哆啦A梦🐈⬛ 🎫 参与条件: 🎫 必须有用户名 🎫 加入-深圳夜生活 🎫 加入-青楼粮票 🎫 加入-晓晓08兼职🉑上门 🎁 奖品内容: 💰️ 半价p × 1 📅 开奖时间：2026-07-19 12:00自动开奖 👉 参与抽奖链接: https://t.me/XGCJ_bot?start=join-L178437136551
🎰 宝安晓晓&&深圳长安群抽奖 📮 参与条件： 🪪 必须设置用户名 🎫 加入-长安优惠抽奖频道 🎫 加入-晓晓08兼职🉑上门 🎫 加入-长安群 🎫 加入-长安上品精选 🎫 加入-长安主频道 🎁 奖品内容： 💰️ 宝安晓晓P半价卷 × 1 ⚠️ 抽奖说明： 中奖的兄弟请在2天内联系老师兑奖，逾期无效，兑奖约课后请尽快提供出击报告，禁止低素质行为。联系老师： @xxby08 注：提前退出群或者频道机器人会判定无效，取消资格 🔋 人品加成：⚡️× 9 规则 📅 开奖日期：(北京时间) 2026年07月19日 16时00分00秒
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Zcc16168. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 953,604 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“晓晓08兼职🉑上门” (@Zcc16168), 517 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Zcc16168.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.