Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

šŸ”’:: š—­š—”š—­š—˜š—”š—š š—£š—„š—¢š—š—˜š—–š—§ šŸ”’

@ZazengProgect

On this record: Growth Ā· Engagement Ā· Reactions Ā· Posts Ā· Citations Ā· Cite this entry

18subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Ā· movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003681692680
TypeChannel
Username@ZazengProgect
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 12 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ZazengProgect

Growth

171817.512 Aug 2026, 23:49 — 17 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 00:01 — 17 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 13:28 — 18 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 23:4913 Aug 2026, 13:28
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean ā€œno change observedā€, never ā€œinterpolatedā€. The vertical axis spans 17–18 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 13:2818+1
13 Aug 2026, 00:0117no change
12 Aug 2026, 23:4917first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

20 reactions across 6 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
customĀ 5276187729078538798840.0%
customĀ 5276090774486802486525.0%
šŸ†’525.0%
šŸ¾15.00%
šŸŽ„15.00%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — šŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by ā€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageā€.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 March 2026 to 22 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Mar 2026, 20:47 UTCviews —

šŸ”’:: š—­š—”š—­š—˜š—”š—š š—£š—„š—¢š—š—˜š—–š—§ šŸ”’ pinned a photo

22 Mar 2026, 17:54 UTC120 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Закрытие?? ŠŸŃ€Š¾ŃŃ‚ŠøŃ‚Šµ, но у Š¼ŠµŠ½Ń уже нет интереса Š“ŠµŠ»Š°Ń‚ŃŒ баннеры, ŃƒŃ…Š¾Š¶Ńƒ в Š“Ń€ŃƒŠ³Š¾Šµ км ( обзоры Ń„Š»ŃƒŠ“Š¾Š² ), те кто Ń…Š¾Ń‚ŃŃ‚ Š·Š°ŠŗŠ»ŃŽŃ‡ŠøŃ‚ŃŒ ŃŠ¾ŃŽŠ· то вот вам канал - @MortPozorFlood , ещё ŃƒŠ²ŠøŠ“ŠµŠ¼ŃŃ #репост

customĀ 52761877290785387982

15 Mar 2026, 15:38 UTCviews —

Channel name was changed to Ā«ĖĖ‹Ā°ā€¢*ā€āž· :: š—­š—”š—­š—˜š—”š—š š—£š—„š—¢š—š—˜š—–š—§ 🫧 Рест»

15 Mar 2026, 15:37 UTC105 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Š‘ŠµŃ€Ńƒ рест! Точное Š²Ń€ŠµŠ¼Ń когГа Š²Ń‹Š¹Š“Ńƒ ŠøŠ· него ŃŠŗŠ°Š·Š°Ń‚ŃŒ не могу Š”Š¾ŃŽŠ·Š½ŠøŠŗŠø не Ń‚ŠµŃ€ŃŠ¹Ń‚Šµ!!

šŸ†’2customĀ 52760907744868024861customĀ 52761877290785387981

14 Mar 2026, 11:37 UTC76 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Разрыв

customĀ 52761877290785387982customĀ 52760907744868024861

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ZazengProgect. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ā‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ā‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 852,272 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the ā€œNamed by N registered channelsā€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

ā€œšŸ”’:: š—­š—”š—­š—˜š—”š—š š—£š—„š—¢š—š—˜š—–š—§ šŸ”’ā€ (@ZazengProgect), 18 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZazengProgect.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Ā· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.