Channel
@Zakon_Gary
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
43subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001839636340 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Zakon_Gary |
| Description | Новости и краткий анализ законодательства о криптовалютах. |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Zakon_Gary |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:00 | 43 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:37 | 43 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2024 to 1 June 2025. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 20 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
@markettwitscryptobitcoin вся альфа, инсайды, метрики и ончейн аналитика по криптовалюте! Бесплатно и без рекламы!
✴️#BTC #cot #sentiment #наблюдение #крипто совокупный открытый интерес во фьючерсах на BTC на всех крупных биржах продолжает бить рекорды, что отражает продолжающийся рост спекулятивных настроений на рынке — Glassnode
#новости #коротко #брикс Если действительно коротко, то новостей нет. Самого противного не случилось, РФ не в черных и не в серых списках. Вероятно, накануне БРИКС, лидеры Китая и Индии решили не портить себе настроение..😅 Риски попадания РФ в эти списки, тем не менее, сохраняются, поэтому не стоит терять бдительность. В остальном, есть большой шанс, что до выборов президента США не случится ничего катастрофическ…
#FATF #Россия #черныйсписок #блокировки FATF может включить Россию в черный список уже 22 октября. Именно такие заголовки появились на днях во всех ведущих финансовых медиа. Напомню, FATF - международная организация по выработке мер борьбы с финансированием терроризма и отмыванием средств. Членство России в FATF было приостановлено в 2023 году. Однако для внесения в черный список необходим консенсус стран-участни…
#Gotbit #отмывание #арест #регуляции Если судить по справедливости, то, конечно, криптовалютный рынок во многом состоит из манипуляций и накруток объемов и всего того, что на традиционных рынках называют мошеннической деятельностью. Одна проблема, мы не на традиционном рынке. По законам США мы не торгуем не на рынке не активами. Ну и какие тут могут быть манипуляции, если нет разницы между Pepe, USDT и DOT, наприм…
#новости #комментарии 0:00 - вступление 01:00 - фильм от HBO раскроет личность Сатоши Накамото (мой комментарий) 03:06 - судья по делу о банкротстве FTX утвердил план выплат кредиторам 03:46 - SEC vs Ripple. SEC подала апелляцию на решение по делу против Ripple 05:10 - жители штата Техас подали коллективный иск против майнинг-гиганта Marathon Digital за нарушение уровня шума 06:15 - статья в Известиях с коммент…
Довольно любопытная история развивается вокруг биржи Cryptex. Казалось бы, ничем не примечательный ноунейм с основателями из России, которые по совместительству создали еще и платежную систему UAPS. Все бы ничего, но через UAPS проходило много грязных денег. Вообще-то все деньги, проходившие через UAPS, были грязными. Вообще-то UAPS и создали для того, чтобы эти грязные деньги гонять по миру. А еще пользователи UA…
#регуляции #иностранныецифровыеправа #обменники Почему не стоит приобретать в российских обменниках USDT? Я не люблю паникерство, но в наших делах осторожность никогда не бывает лишней. Закон и майнинге вводит новое понятие «иностранные цифровые права», которое по формату применения, кажется, больше подходит к ЦФА, поскольку запрещает обычным смертным приобретение и операции без лицензии. Напомню, что мы с вами, …
Запись подкаста с прекрасной Ксенией, автором канала «Закон Гэри» . Рекомендую подписать ! 🤖Индикатор |💰Закрытый клуб| 📹YouTube |🎯 IO BOT | 👨🎓 Обучение
https://t.me/Crypt0_Din?livestream=a47775ceb37ad112b8
Ребят, присоединяйтесь, спонтанный аудиочат с Дином
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Zakon_Gary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Zakon_Gary named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Закон Рынка | Закон Гэри” (@Zakon_Gary), 43 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Zakon_Gary.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.