Disband. Thanks.

Channel
Zachruelle Family #FindingNemo
@Zachruelle
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
136subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001890635329 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Zachruelle |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 23 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Zachruelle |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:06 | 136 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 136 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 23 February 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 May 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 26s
- Average length
- 9s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5 reactions across 2 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 40.0% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 40.0% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 23 February 2023 to 24 May 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
yang fw aku kasih kecup
Sticker, posted without a caption
👍2🍓1
Out-of-the-way straddling th planetoid, th roar of equipment puffed lorryload. A warm life among the family; Zachruelle. As an affirmation looking for new family members who are ready to build warmth. But with simple conditions: - Accept all lines and all genders except those that have been written on the taken list. And it's not recommended to simply swap temporary faces, or be multi-character. - Not intended for …
❤2
Sticker, posted without a caption
🌺 𝐀𝐧𝐨𝐦𝐚𝐥𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐫𝐡𝐲𝐭𝐡𝐦 ‘𝐦𝐢𝐝𝐬𝐭 𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐧𝐚𝐛𝐮𝐥𝐮𝐦 𝐞𝐩𝐢𝐭𝐨𝐦𝐢𝐳𝐞𝐬 𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐢𝐳𝐞𝐝 𝐛𝐲 𝐚 𝐦𝐚𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐟 𝐬𝐚𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐚𝐲𝐨𝐧𝐝 “𝐈𝐝𝐲𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐜 𝐎’ 𝐌𝐚𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐧—𝐒𝐨𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐭 𝐈𝐈𝐈 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐬𝐩𝐢𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐦 𝐧𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐬𝐭.” 𝐀 𝐦𝐚𝐠𝐧𝐮𝐦 𝐨𝐩𝐮𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐝𝐨𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐧𝐭 ‘𝐦𝐢𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐆𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐤 𝐌𝐲𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐥𝐨𝐠𝐲 𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐞 ‘𝐭𝐢𝐬 𝐞𝐟𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐜𝐢𝐨𝐮𝐬𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐥𝐲 𝐜𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐆𝐨𝐝𝐝𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐬 𝐰𝐡𝐨𝐦 𝐩𝐥𝐮𝐦𝐦𝐞𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 ‘𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐬𝐜𝐚𝐫𝐯𝐞𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐭 𝐛𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐜 𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐨𝐝𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐰𝐚𝐫𝐝 𝐦𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐨𝐮𝐬𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐝𝐢𝐚𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐨𝐧. ۪۫❁‧₊˚
⸒·₊🌬°۰ Hellenism cypriot grecize the panhellenism scholarch erymanthus of irenarch glyconian ancientry by grandiosity obnoxious narcissus—was a machiavellianism omnipotence greatness thoroughly the impetuous nymph: perfectionist tendencies concordance of insouciance heritability. Self-enhancement is exhibitionism, goddesses of staggering desirability who fell rapaciously in, infatuated into their portraiture as it mi…
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤㅤ Tranquil rictus emerge as floriferous waive for their giver-of-light. Fretting emanates and desirous for solicitude creatures terpsichore subalternity glimmers of the daylight star with quavering eclipse and utterance cracks. When the sun meet a glimpse of its moon and inflorescence can only weep its dews. It begin; rolling tears, bleeding lips, perpetual martyrdom in the chest, nevertheless the portrayal of frien…
ㅤㅤ Inflamed shrubs efflorescence among the scrumptious meadow and overrun with humongous timberland. Postern patulous to acknowledge a rouge flourishing in the omphalos with fluorescent luminous from an aperture in the impediment of the menage. Escalier are succumbing hither to the destination and passing anything that is difficult to pass. Paramountcy that arises in a mortal will make megacosm acquire and bequ…
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤㅤㅤ ✿ ੭ 𝐈𝐧𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐛𝐥𝐲 𝐦𝐢𝐫𝐭𝐡 𝐚𝐮𝐫𝐨𝐫𝐚 𝐚𝐫𝐨𝐬𝐞, 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐥𝐲 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐥𝐮𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐫𝐲 𝐰𝐢𝐞𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐝 𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐫𝐨𝐬𝐞. 𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐥 𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐞𝐧𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐜𝐜𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐬𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐲, 𝐛𝐚𝐥𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐟𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐝𝐞𝐜𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐝 𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐦𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐭𝐞 𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐝𝐬𝐭 𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐮𝐦𝐩𝐡 𝐨𝐧 𝐅𝐞𝐛𝐫𝐮𝐚𝐫𝐲 𝟐𝟓𝐭𝐡; 𝐇𝐚𝐞𝐰𝐨𝐧. ੭ . ⁺ >
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Zachruelle. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,340,482 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Zachruelle named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Zachruelle Family #FindingNemo” (@Zachruelle), 136 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Zachruelle.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.