Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ZVTV

@ZVTV_2

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,185subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001809107605
TypeChannel
Username@ZVTV_2
Created6 August 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ZVTV_2

Growth

3,1853,1923,188.57 August 2026 — 3,192 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,192 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,189 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,185 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,184–3,193 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 06:273,185-4
10 Aug 2026, 07:163,189-3
7 Aug 2026, 10:463,192no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:383,192first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 27 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
59.1%
avg views ÷ 3,185 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,880
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.41%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held16 (27 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total22,582
Reactions total996
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 04s
Average length
3m 02s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,298 reactions across 16 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁81362.6%
🤡14811.4%
🥰917.01%
🤣604.62%
💩322.47%
💯282.16%
👀211.62%
🤔171.31%
🙈161.23%
🤩120.924%
😢100.77%
🤮100.77%
🌚70.539%
50.385%
🔥50.385%
😱40.308%
❤‍🔥30.231%
🎉30.231%
🤯30.231%
🤷‍♂30.231%
5 further kinds70.539%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,298reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 12:41 UTC701 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👀21🤩12💯9🤡31🕊1

7 Aug 2026, 12:38 UTC811 views62 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мы не одинаковые #Светов Закреп | ZVTV. Подписаться | ZVTVitter | Чат

😁56🌚2🤡21👏1

6 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC≈1,270 views114 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Светов не желает поражения России на СВО (главное, что без Путина) и заявил, что Украина ведёт империалистическую войну по отношению к русскому Крыму. #Светов Закреп | ZVTV. Подписаться | ZVTVitter | Чат

😁65🤡27🤣15🤷‍♂3🤔2🤮2

5 Aug 2026, 20:36 UTCviews —55 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

😁35🤔9😱4🤡3👌2💩2

4 Aug 2026, 07:26 UTC≈1,590 views68 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#Мем #Светов Закреп | ZVTV. Подписаться | ZVTVitter | Чат

💩30😁27🤮5🥰4🖕2

27 Jul 2026, 10:09 UTC≈2,500 views81 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ой, да мы знаем, что это ваш девиз #Мем #SVTV Закреп | ZVTV. Подписаться | ZVTVitter | Чат

😁71🤡4🎉3💯3

26 Jul 2026, 13:01 UTC≈2,410 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Казалось бы, причём тут вернувшийся с сво справа #SVTV Оригинальный пост Закреп | ZVTV. Подписаться | ZVTVitter | Чат

😁30🤔6🤡2🤯1

25 Jul 2026, 11:23 UTC≈1,840 views97 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @truestlomPhoto

В этом году ЛПР исполнилось 18 лет. Думайте.

😁81🤣10🔥4🤡2

24 Jul 2026, 18:36 UTC≈1,980 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ну да, Мишенька, хохлы просто так ударили (правда, почему-то только по конкретному) складу WB, а еврейский либеральный Шендерович посмел наговорить абсолютно простых россиян, говоря им "Очнитесь, остановите войну! Если перестанете бомбить Украину, то прекратят бомбить вас, всё просто!" Про склады Вайлдберизз в Электростали и Котовске хорошо написала Воля: что с ними не так, почему именно они. #SVTV Оригинальный пос

😁40🤡6🔥1

24 Jul 2026, 17:22 UTC≈1,840 views95 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Либертарианец смеет заявить: #Светов Закреп | ZVTV. Подписаться | ZVTVitter | Чат

😁79🤡12❤‍🔥31

20 Jul 2026, 15:59 UTC≈2,520 views108 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Давайте скажем? #Комментарии Оригинальный комментарий Закреп | ZVTV. Подписаться | ZVTVitter | Чат

😁102🌚5🤡1

17 Jul 2026, 17:14 UTC≈2,650 views58 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Всё, расходимся, это ROFLS Но никто не был бы удивлён, если бы это было правдой

😁25🤡24💯9

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @ZVTV_2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ZVTV” (@ZVTV_2), 3,185 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZVTV_2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.