Channel
@ZVETNY
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
28subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002567561632 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ZVETNY |
| Description | Наш Tt: https://www.tiktok.com/@zvetny_linght?_t=ZM-90J3cA2iMsV&_r=1 По вступлению писать: @wxnsr @k1riszx |
| Created | 23 May 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ZVETNY |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:30 | 28 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 28 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 23 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
43 reactions across 8 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 17 | 39.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 16.3% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 11.6% | |
| 💔 | 4 | 9.30% | |
| ☃ | 2 | 4.65% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 2.33% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 2.33% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 2.33% | |
| 👾 | 1 | 2.33% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 2.33% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 2.33% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 2.33% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 2.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 43reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 23 May 2025 to 10 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ZVETNY. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 May 2025 to 10 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Флуд 𝒁𝒗𝒆𝒕𝒏𝒚 𝒍𝒊𝒏𝒈𝒉𝒕 закрывается по причине неактива. Чат для участников остаётся открытым — при желании вы можете продолжать общение между собой. Прошу понять и извинить: я морально устал и сейчас не могу продолжать вести флуд. Спасибо всем, кто был здесь и поддерживал атмосферу Возможно мы все-таки возобновим флуд но со временем, сейчас к сожалению не это время 🐈⬛
💔4❤3❤🔥1
🤍𝙯𝙫𝙚𝙩𝙣𝙮 𝙡𝙞𝙣𝙝𝙜𝙩 🤍 поздравляет всех участников с наступающим Новым годом! 🎄✨ 2025 год был непростым, но всё, что осталось в прошлом, пусть уходит вместе с ним. А новый год, дай Бог, будет только лучше — светлее, спокойнее и счастливее Пусть впереди нас ждут новые идеи, тёплые встречи, яркие эмоции и большие возможности 🤍 Желаем веры в себя, исполнения желаний и радости в каждом дне С наступающим Новым годом, друзья!…
❤🔥3❤1
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ➖➖➖➖➖ —фараон объясняет #жизньфлуда
❤5🔥3🥰1
➖➖➖➖➖ ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ —ⲃⲥⲧⲩⲡⲁύ ⲕ ⲏⲁⲙ ⲧы) #жизньфлуда
❤3👍1💘1🔥1
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ —𝗖𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗮𝗯𝗼𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗯𝗲𝘁𝘄𝗲𝗲𝗻: 𝗭𝘃𝗲𝘁𝗻𝘆 𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴𝗵𝘁 /𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗕𝗟𝗢𝗢𝗗𝗬 𝗥𝗜𝗧𝗨𝗔𝗟 По вступлению в 𝗭𝘃𝗲𝘁𝗻𝘆 𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴𝗵𝘁 писать🖤 @ver1xc @wxnsr По вступлению в 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗕𝗟𝗢𝗢𝗗𝗬 𝗥𝗜𝗧𝗨𝗔𝗟 писать🖤 @Alexandra_Lozovaya @Threexsees366oi
❤2
🌺🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🌺 ➖𝑨𝒓𝒔 𝒍𝒐𝒏𝒈𝒂, 𝒗𝒊𝒕𝒂 𝒃𝒓𝒆𝒗𝒊𝒔.🌕
Signed Zvetny
Видео сделано владельцем,в благодарность старшему админу за поддержу в поднятии актива во флуде и вообще за общение все эти месяцы🤍
✨𝙯𝙫𝙚𝙩𝙣𝙮 𝙡𝙞𝙣𝙜𝙝𝙩 ✨ поздравляет всех участников с 1 сентября! Пусть новый учебный год принесёт море идей, вдохновения, новых знакомств и ярких побед ✨ Желаем лёгких дорог к знаниям и больших открытий каждый день С праздником, друзья! ✨
❤🔥2⚡1🎉1🕊1😭1
➖🦋🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🦋➖ ➖➖➖ 𝑵𝒊𝒈𝒉𝒕𝑭𝒂𝒍𝒍 Тгк:https://t.me/infochannelNightFall Snake pits 𝙍𝙖𝙦𝙤𝙖𝙝 🇪🇸 @RaqoahInfo @RaqoahLife Vagrivs ➖➖ 😘ваша ролевая может быть здесь!
❤2
Signed мама твоя
🐇🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🐇 𓆩 (2 фото вашего персонажа в чб)𓆪 ∘ Имя ∘ Возраст ∘ Дата рождения ∘ Предыстория/особенности 〢юз:(для удобства администрации)
Signed мама твоя
🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ ⏳🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ ➖➖➖ ➖➖ ᴄᴨиᴄᴏᴋ ᴩᴇᴄᴛ-учᴀᴄᴛниᴋᴏʙ. ʍᴀᴋᴄ. днᴇй ᴩᴇᴄᴛᴀ - 2 нᴇдᴇᴧи.
Signed мама твоя
🪽🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🪽 ➖➖➖ 🕊Владелец:𝗩𝗹𝗮𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗹𝗮𝘃 𝗖𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗮𝘁𝘆/ @kilihvaaa672 ➖➖➖ 🕊Старшие администраторы: 1. Константин Гецати 2. Ольга Якубович 1.модерация чата 2.контроль поведения участников 3.обсуждение спорных ситуаций ➖➖➖ 🕊Младшие администраторы: 1.𝗜𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗮 𝗜𝗴𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗻𝗸𝗼 @wxnsr 2. Свободно 1.поиск нью 2.помощь с адаптацией 3.коммуникация с участниками ➖➖➖ 🕊Модераторы канала: 𝗜𝗹𝗼𝗻𝗮 𝗡𝗼𝘃𝗼𝘀𝗲𝗹𝗼𝘃𝗮 @moi_and_moi 𝗚𝗹𝗲𝗯 𝗚𝗼𝗹𝘂𝗯𝗶𝗻 @mrazevxs…
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @ZVETNY. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 547,892 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ZVETNY named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝙞𝙣𝙛𝙤 𝙯𝙫𝙚𝙩𝙣𝙮 𝙡𝙞𝙣𝙜𝙝𝙩” (@ZVETNY), 28 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZVETNY.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.