骚鸡

Channel
吃瓜中心🪅龙行知天下🌏
@ZTX95
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
58,407subscribers
+7,498 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001660182894 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ZTX95 |
| Description | 阅头条,知天下。 🔻收录新鲜事🔻 每日精选推送//网络趣味收藏夹⭐️ 新闻 |吃瓜 |沙雕 |实拍 |娱乐 |搞笑 | 发布内容不做权威考究,娱乐为主。 投稿/商务合作👉 @sssv9999 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ZTX95 |
Topic
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 17:21 | 58,407 | -3,846 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 15:58 | 62,253 | -1,285 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 13:56 | 63,538 | +953 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 00:19 | 62,585 | +1,500 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 06:15 | 61,085 | +4,121 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 21:16 | 56,964 | +1,687 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 16:20 | 55,277 | +1,680 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 02:55 | 53,597 | +926 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:03 | 52,671 | +428 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:35 | 52,243 | +652 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:57 | 51,591 | +314 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:25 | 51,277 | +213 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 51,064 | +107 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:38 | 50,957 | +258 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:33 | 50,699 | +157 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 20:54 | 50,542 | -80 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:04 | 50,622 | -99 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:14 | 50,721 | +331 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 09:05 | 50,390 | -123 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 18:58 | 50,513 | first reading |
Engagement
937 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 104 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.51%
- avg views ÷ 58,407 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,470
- 594 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.076%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 594
- of 937 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 139 of 594 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 937 (7 August 2026 – 27 September 2026) |
| Views total | 871,800 |
| Reactions total | 146 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 03:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈20,400
- Videos
- ≈25,600
- Links
- ≈6,570
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 10h 49m
- Average length
- 53s
Measured directly from 729 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,407 reactions across 260 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 601 | 25.0% | |
| 🔥 | 517 | 21.5% | |
| ❤ | 291 | 12.1% | |
| 🥰 | 208 | 8.64% | |
| 😍 | 162 | 6.73% | |
| ⚡ | 146 | 6.07% | |
| 👏 | 101 | 4.20% | |
| 😱 | 97 | 4.03% | |
| 👎 | 72 | 2.99% | |
| 🤣 | 65 | 2.70% | |
| 💔 | 44 | 1.83% | |
| 👌 | 34 | 1.41% | |
| 😭 | 34 | 1.41% | |
| 🙏 | 25 | 1.04% | |
| 🤮 | 10 | 0.415% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 264 of the 937 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,407 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 937 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
骑马好啊集美爱骑 #弹力测试
#美女 #合集
顶级 #巨乳 峰会 👀
疯狂 #游乐园 刺激翻倍 #空中飞人 #事故
#黑人 哈尼上手了 !
Photo, posted without a caption
⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ 😀😀😀😀😀😀 ➡️ 全网已押千万u点击传送门 👈 ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️数字网投领导者! ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 始终坚持“用户至上,信誉为本”的运营理念,力求为玩家带来公平公正、真实专业的高品质游戏竞技,让你体验顶级博彩乐趣! 【🇺🇦:🇺🇦😻🤔🥴🤧😷👿,创造人生新财富!】 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣选择 ⚡️⚡️ 必须发 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣选择 ⚡️⚡️ 必须发 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣选择 ⚡️⚡️ 必须发 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣选择 ⚡️⚡️ 必须发 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣选择 ⚡️⚡️ 必须发 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣选择 ⚡️⚡️ 必须发 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ 顶级博彩娱乐尽在⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🙄😶😄😶 😀体育官方合作品牌, 为荣耀而战 让梦想实现😀 😀 新人六重豪礼 😀代理八重扶持 😀 每日专属优惠活动 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ : @bifagj 🐋🐋🐋🐋 : ht
8️⃣🔤🔤🔤🙂↔️🥲🧐🤓🤓😛🥲😍🤓 😛⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡ 🥰百亿打造只做行业第一品牌,我们承诺绝不卡款,绝不黑款,因为背叛品牌的代价太高,无论大户豪赌,小户爆大奖,0审核,秒出款,海外华人娱乐首选8cc集团! 🥰千万域名 百亿大盘 顶奢品牌 大户首选 🤘全网福利天花板👍 👍入款笔笔加赠3️⃣% 🤝优惠🤓返水🤓彩金🤓红包 全网第一 😒大额出款🤓零审核🤓秒到账 最强信誉 🥰强大资金储备随时支持 1️⃣0️⃣倍验资 🤭欢迎全网玩家监督品鉴 😍只玩真实 🧐用心打造全球顶级品牌 😍实力毋庸置疑! 😉全球布局 娱乐造富,无惧爆庄 千万秒出! 🧐😝😘🥸😘 😁😁😁😁 😁😁😁😁😁 @C8CC 😁😁😁😁😁 @D8CC 😁😁😁😁😁 @G8CC 😁😁😁😁😁 @K8CC 😁😁😁😁😁 8cc139.cc 😁😁😁😁😁 携 Solaire 千亿实体资本入场,菲律宾索
#2026世界杯 #美加墨世界杯 #体育内幕 #足球包赢 #协议足球 🚨迎战2026世界杯,四年一次的机会,有人发财,有人洗白,抓住机会你就能上岸发财,公司世界杯渠道已经全部对接好,有资源来打爆狗庄‼️ 💎全网寻找大量的赌博平台下注合作,我们做的是协议球,协议球的意思就是假球,所有足球比赛都有内幕‼️ 🔈我们公司专注协议球渠道,只要你手上有资源,有赌博平台、体育盘口下注,我这边给你提供足球或者其他体育内幕料,只要你能下注成功,能出款就是捡钱,比赛做了协议就是包赢。 如果比赛输了,我们公司包赔下注本金,比赛赢了盈利五五交收‼️ 🌐合作进频道联系财神:https://t.me/+J60FmYP9PqNjNDU1
1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣—1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ 1️⃣ 游戏机器人:@feitou(👈点击进入) 正版厂商 · 盘总首选 · 商会保障 · 大额无忧 飞投娱乐 · 妈祖庇佑 · 商会护航 · 一起玩赢 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ U充U提不限iP 多重炸裂活动持续上线 官方频道每天发6个红包 游戏多福利好 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣:@fjsh 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣:@usdb 🐋🐋🐋🐋: fjsh.com 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣:@feitou
广东,你们用的无菌牙线
Showing the 12 most recent of 937 posts we hold for @ZTX95. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@bifagj · 4,83933 posts2028122.COM- 2028体育官方频道
@pg115 · 14,10233 posts8K国际 官方频道
@SSVIP8K · 16,90530 posts8k国际官方频道
@vip8k090 · 5,25230 postsN1118.COM- N1国际官方频道
@pg100 · 2,17621 posts8k3008.com- 8K国际官方频道
@vip8k66 · 5,92414 posts78.COM-官方频道@DF78
@tg78com · 19,99213 posts8p娱乐城
@www8pmom · 6373 posts奇趣百科 导航
@QQmua · 39,4582 postsAV-NO.1🔞
@avqqc · 17,8401 post超级现场🚷意外|车祸|监控
@kxiha · 7,8251 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@chigua181 · 857#1
@wasc001 · 1,770#2
@Chi_GuaNB · 503#3
@jpzvo · 220,621#4
@sosonews · 4,811#5
@AQzx_1 · 175,586#6
@chigua_08 · 21,560#7
@aimeinv88 · 23,415#8
@nbgzd · 10,411#9
@NFSCHimalayaNews · 9,457#10
@ibubapatsj2 · 693#11
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@aimeinv88 · 23,415
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 20 here — alongside 19 others — read 18 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“吃瓜中心🪅龙行知天下🌏” (@ZTX95), 58,407 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZTX95.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.