Channel
@ZIRMIZI
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
36subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001037237533 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ZIRMIZI |
| Description | مسئولین ما آفات قدرت را فراموش کردهاند اشرافیت آفت قدرت است مطالب این کانال در راستای هوشیاری و بیدار کردن مسئولین نظام است به ما ملحق شوید |
| Created | Between 1 January 2016 and 31 October 2016— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ZIRMIZI |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 36 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:05 | 36 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 February 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 November 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
فیلمی توسط کانال تلگرامی دولت بهار از دکتر احمدینژاد منتشر شده که در ابتدای آن مخاطبین مشخص شده گروهی که هيچ اعتقادی به رهبری ندارند و بجای کلمه رهبری از خامنهای استفاده کردهاند زيرنويس کردند احمدینژاد خطاب به خامنهای! اين کلیپ مورد سادهلوحانی قرار گرفته که خود را حامی رهبری میدادند و با این فیلم در صددند در جامعه چنین القا کنند احمدینژاد ضدولایت است اگر اين کلیپ توسط حامیان رهبری تهيه شده بود قطعا نام ولایت …
کدامیک از گزینه های زیر درباره حسنروحانی صحيح است
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
کاندیدای شورای شهر را بشناسید سردار پرویز سروری: تهمت به عیسی شریفی معاون شهردار... *سیاسی* است.... حامی دزدان باز هم کاندید شورای شهر شده @ZIRMIZI
دومین دوره شورای شهر تهران که حاصل آن انتخاب دکتر محمود احمدینژاد شهردار تهران و متعاقب آن رئیسجمهور ایران شد وزارت کشور خاتمی در این دوره از تمام اقشار را در انتخابات شورای شهر مشارکت داد رهبری چون به روستای کنارک رفته بودند! در انتخابات شرکت نکردند @ZIRMIZI
چرا به هر قیمتی (حتیگزاف) احمدینژاد نباید بیاید
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
چه کسی بیاید مهم نیست چه کسی نیاید مهم است. جلیلی، سعيد محمد يا رئیسی يا حتی همتی و روحانی، فقط احمدینژاد نیاید. احمدینژاد نیاید هرخری میخواهد بیاید.. با مولوی عبدالحمید که بارها مورد غضب اصولگرایان بوده همراه میشوند از موتورسواران زن و سلبریتیها و همراهی با مدیران آفتاب یزد و ابتکار و... تا تغییر موضع گرفتن از منصور ارضی ... فقط احمدینژاد نیاید هرچند با خطر ريزش آرای ملت و سرخوردگی قشر عظیمی از دوستداران احم…
دقیقهای سیميليون تومان فقط خرج يک تابلوی تبلیغاتی سیدمحرومان در سطح کشور يک تناسب ببندید سیدمحرومان اين همه پول را از کجا آورده @ZIRMIZI
همچون نوشته وزیر احمدینژاد گویا دستور از احمدینژاد داشته پاسخگوی سخنان مصلحی مستقیما رهبری میباشد که او را منصوب نمودند @ZIRMIZI
باوعدهء اجرای برنامه های احمدینژاد و چندتا وزير دولت احمدینژاد و تقلید رفتار احمدینژاد وحذف احمدینژاد آیا برای اولینبار یک رئیسجمهور اصولگرا رأی میآره!!! https://t.me/ZIRMIZI
انقلاب از ریل خود خارج شده. آیا گناه ملت است اینهمه ثروت که آمد دستشان از اشک و آه ملت است مانع است شورانگهبان تا کسی از غیرشان وارد شود یک نفر از دستشان دررفته او پشت وپناه ملت است تاکنون هرکس که بر مسند نشسته بوده ازاین دوجناح درچنین وضع رأی ندادن بیگمان آغاز راه ملت است هرکسی تا این زمان تأیید شورای نگهبان گشته است فتنهگر گردیدهو گفتی که اینها اشتباه ملت است حاصل این انتخابات بوده بر مردم ستم تا این زمان …
آمریکا بیش از چهل ساله که با ما دشمنی علنی داره همیشه هم در بوقهای جهانی خود برعلیه ایران مواضع تندی داشته اما امسال بطور عجيبی انتخابات ریاست جمهوری را محکوم نکرده عجیب نیست؟ 🇮🇷🇮🇷🇮🇷🇮🇷🇮🇷🇮🇷🇮🇷 🇺🇸🇬🇧🇺🇸🇬🇧🇺🇸🇬🇧🇺🇸 https://t.me/ZIRMIZI/2292
دقت کردین دولتهای غربی علیرغم دفعات قبل، دربارهی انتخابات هيچ اظهارنظری نمیکنند 🤔🤔🤔🤔 https://t.me/ZIRMIZI/2291
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ZIRMIZI. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
کدامیک از گزینه های زیر درباره حسنروحانی صحيح است
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
چرا به هر قیمتی (حتیگزاف) احمدینژاد نباید بیاید
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2021 to 22 November 2021. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,014,714 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“زیرمیزی 💵” (@ZIRMIZI), 36 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZIRMIZI.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.