Channel
@ZFQBG
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
886subscribers
-528 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001917737241 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ZFQBG |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ZFQBG |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 886 | -67 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 04:55 | 953 | -129 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:27 | 1,082 | -75 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:45 | 1,157 | -178 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:02 | 1,335 | -79 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 1,414 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:48 | 1,414 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 28 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 75.0% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 28 February 2026 to 5 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#网友投稿 🇱🇰 #斯里兰卡 U8 娱乐被抓 120 人事件 U8 娱乐今天在斯里兰卡办公大楼被端，抓获 120 余人。此次并非被同行举报，而是被办公室楼下的一家理发店举报。 事件经过：U8 娱乐的推广人员在 3AM 理发店理发，消费 80000 卢比后嫌贵，随后在斯里兰卡社交群内引发争吵，事态愈演愈烈。U8 娱乐的推广人员连续几天到 3AM 理发店大吵大闹、辱骂店员。最终，3AM 理发店气不过，举报该大楼非法经营电信诈骗。今天上午，该公司被警方端掉。老板哭晕在厕所。真是冤枉啊～～～ PS：打败你的不一定是同行，牛逼 666。 📣 🔋Trx能量手 @xiaoai33trxbot ⚡商务合作： @xiaoai33
❤1😢1
#小姐姐吐槽：被博彩杀🐷平台MF 名凡娱乐诈骗近100万人民币。 这是骗子的飞机账户和诈骗博彩平台，骗子和博彩平台客服其实是一个人用2个账户和我聊天。 骗子一开始告诉我这是正规的有证书的博彩平台，充值1万u，每天可以有500元的利息。 15天可以领取一次。后面等到15天提现的时候告诉我提款操作失败，要继续交2万u重置通道费用，交了2万u后又告诉我说我信用积分不够要继续再交2万多u补齐之后就可以提现了。 后面告诉我说不用交钱了，等到25号有新活动后就可以提现了。到了25号又告诉我说骗子和公司打招呼了，又继续每天给我500利息，要我再等一个月才能提现。总而言之就是拖着。 此平台客服长期对我进行性骚扰，要求发自慰视频，裸照威胁。🤣🤣 由于本人不提供自慰视频，不舔鸡巴，不发裸照，他要求我返还他帮我冲值平台的3000u，我告诉他你拿出来充值记录我马上给你，他告诉我公司10几个地址，哪有时间给你查这个，全是诈骗。 后面一个自称…
#网友投稿：当你在机场取票处附近走路（马来西亚吉隆坡、东马、曼谷最严重，新加坡等），突然会有中国人与你打招呼，专门挑中国人行骗。 包装伪装，拿着行李，跟你说没有现金换汇，也是刚下飞机，没有钱打车，找你要钱打车，换算人民币100-500左右。一个机场有6个人以上同时行骗，骗到一个，他们会偷偷拍照（猪仔照片背面），避免重复行骗！ 同伙作案。如果你有很多现金，再看你包装是不是有钱人，大门口会有人跟踪你。如果你是单独一个人，大家最好避开，避免被跟踪，影响自身安全！出门在外不容易，不管是旅游还是工作，这些人太可恶，必须曝光！ 细想太恐怖，他们已经没有诈骗可做了，直接现场实验查看人性，寻找更直接的猎物！危害人身安全，一个人一天骗取30个人成功，如果是团伙作案，如何保证自己的安全？所以出门在外的同胞一定要小心 😀😀😀😀 😍商务合作： @xiaoai33
急售一套西港悦海湾的海景房 三百多平 可随时过户 仅18.88万美元就可面朝大海 春暖花开 有需要买房的朋友私信 @xiaoai33
Photo, posted without a caption
中国同胞注意！柬埔寨将持续加强外国人登记管理 #柬单网 #柬埔寨新闻 柬单网报道，2026年起，柬埔寨政府进一步加强对外国人管理系统（FPCS）的执法力度，要求所有向外国人出租房屋的房东及相关业主严格履行登记义务，未按规定注册或更新信息者将面临罚款处罚。 柬埔寨政府规定，凡向外国人出租房屋的房东，必须及时完成房产信息及外国租客资料登记。若未按规定完成注册，房东将面临罚款处罚，每名未登记的外国租客对应罚款3万瑞尔（约合7.5美元）。副首相兼内政部长苏速卡近日提醒，自2026年3月起，凡有外国居民或工作人员居住的房产，房东必须依法向主管机关报告相关信息，未按规定登记者将依法处理。 外国人管理系统（FPCS）由柬埔寨国家警察总署负责管理，并由移民总局自2020年7月1日起正式启用。该系统旨在记录和追踪外国人在柬埔寨的居住信息，以加强国家安全和公共秩序管理，并确保外国人居住在合法登记的住所内。根据相关规定，所有涉及外国人居住的房产…
❤2
注意！持有效商务签入境柬埔寨，也需查营业执照、劳工证 自2月27日下午起，柬埔寨金边、西港多家旅行社及出入境中介机构陆续发布紧急通知，称即日起暂停为所有入境的外籍人士办理落地商务签证。与此同时，旅游签证仍可正常办理。 此举被业内人士解读为柬埔寨政府近期加强打击电诈犯罪的重要配套措施之一。 据柬埔寨梦回吴哥旅行社负责人杨总向柬单网记者透露，此次政策调整来得突然，不仅暂停办理落地商务签，对于已经持有有效商务签证的外籍人士，入境时也将面临更加严格的审查。 “入境时会被要求提交公司营业执照、劳工证等证明材料，海关人员还会详细询问工作情况，核实信息的真实性。”杨总表示。 西港星海旅行社也证实这一变化。该旅行社负责人称，从2月27日下午开始，已无法为客人办理落地商务签证，同时暂停受理长期签证的“带关”服务。 多名中介人士表示，即便是持有效长期签证入境的外籍人士，目前过关时被问话的几率也大幅上升。尤其是年轻人，审查尤为严格。 …
请相互转告一下，有柬埔寨长期签证的，最近不要安排入境柬埔寨，现在每个机场查的很严，有柬埔寨长期签证且没有公司担保的人为重点排查对象。都会被遣返回国！
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @ZFQBG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 470,901 of 1,629,535 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“꧁柬埔寨🇰🇭曝光，吃瓜，查车报备꧂𝑪𝒉𝒊𝒏𝒂 🅥” (@ZFQBG), 886 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZFQBG.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.