众诚集团话术馆 pinned a photo

Channel
众诚集团话术馆
@ZCJThsg
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
393subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 17 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001881258537 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ZCJThsg |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 17 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ZCJThsg |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:47 | 393 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:52 | 395 | -7 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 402 | no change |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:45 | 402 | first reading |
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 4 December 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 July 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
28 reactions across 6 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 17 | 60.7% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 14.3% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 10.7% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 10.7% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 3.57% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 4 December 2023 to 6 July 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🎭✅精聊神器AI换脸,直播变脸,模型4000w精模 可演示 迪拜可面谈🎭 🌼最新技术 【可给客户飞吻】【可摸脸】【摸五官】【捏鼻子】【抵抗市面上各类已知AI世界技术】【提高信任】🌼 🥇直播间变脸换脸、精摸低价、主流软件和客户视频全屏显示🥇 🔥美颜瘦脸、绿幕背景、手机摄像头视频样样精通🔥 💕模仿明星、名人、网红声音,完美搭配AI视频换脸技术💯 🚀上压20000u交易有保证 全网第一💫 🔥独家 凡成交客户 赠送 精聊 大区洗群类业务诊断 协助梳理流程 解决团队问题诊断咨询🔥 【🔈独家解决AI视频 【账号封号问题】 登号问题 独家技术👍】 ☎️官方客服: ✅ @openphone2025 ✅ @ste9889 ✅ 换脸效果展示:@ai6886✅
❤1🎉1👍1
Crypto.com 网页版现金购买ETH教程
🎉1👍1
https://youtu.be/V-leMvrpZTA?si=G1thtnzJW8YF6iuT 革命转币教程
加密货币场外交易实际上是如何运作的? :像 Circle Trade 这样的场外交易平台在加密货币行业中发挥着重要作用,但很少有人了解它们为何重要、它们如何工作以及它们之间的区别。作为我们为您提供关键市场洞察的使命的一部分,我们 Circle Research 深入研究了加密货币交易平台的相关性、结构和分类。 与传统金融领域的同行类似,加密货币场外交易柜台的交易量巨大,但似乎不透明,处于公众视野之外。在本文中,我们的目标是阐明加密货币场外交易的实际运作方式。 什么是场外交易市场? 组织金融市场有两种基本方式——交易所和“场外交易”(OTC)。 纽约证券交易所等交易所或Poloniex等加密货币交易所本质上充当买家和卖家之间的调解人。交易者公布他们愿意出售资产的价格(要价),其他人则公布他们愿意购买资产的价格(出价)。当出价和要价重叠时,交易所就会促进交易。所有交易都是公开进行的,不同资产的交易价格就是您在 CNBC 底…
❤3👎2🎉1👍1
File, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
众诚集团话术馆 pinned «大群链接:https://t.me/zhongcheng888888 文案馆:https://t.me/Shihuang888888 文案馆讨论组:https://t.me/ShihuangChat»
大群链接:https://t.me/zhongcheng888888 文案馆:https://t.me/Shihuang888888 文案馆讨论组:https://t.me/ShihuangChat
❤2
File, posted without a caption
❤5
File, posted without a caption
❤6👎2🔥1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @ZCJThsg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@ZCJThsg named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 18 August 2026 – 18 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@abc03 · 230,521
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 34 here — alongside 33 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“众诚集团话术馆” (@ZCJThsg), 393 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZCJThsg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.