Channel
@Z30o2o
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
30subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003560599897 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Z30o2o |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 8 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Z30o2o |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:03 | 30 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 29 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (8 May 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 246 |
| Reactions total | 12 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 00:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
148 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5373162142092528421 | 53 | 35.8% | |
| custom 5372870505223191705 | 50 | 33.8% | |
| custom 5359831315225020369 | 45 | 30.4% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 148reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Z30o2o. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 May 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
У одной, клянусь, были твои мимика и глаза, А другая в скандалах употребляла твои слова. Я хотел хоть в чём-то, хоть в ком-то тебя осязать. Но тебя не слепить, просто не воссоздать. Я стою напротив, побитый самим собой. Тебя не нашел ни в одной другой
File, posted without a caption
Posted without readable text
почему я не могу забыть тебя? почему каждую ночь мне снится наш поцелуй? любить тебя никогда не было ошибкой, а наоборот. искусство, которое хотелось изучать всю жизнь.
Ты из тех, кто переломанными ногами дойдет до Севера. Я из тех, кто не понимает зачем идти на Север, но идёт рядом с тобой.
ты скоро почувствуешь, что разрушил. скоро лишишься сна. я говорил тебе, зря ты меня не слушал. это была она.
custom 53598313152250203695custom 53731621420925284214custom 53728705052231917053
Я — парадокс. Хочу быть счастливым, но думаю о вещах, которые расстраивают меня. Я не нравлюсь себе, но я также люблю то, кем являюсь. Я говорю, что мне плевать, но вообще-то это не так. Я жажду внимания, но отвергаю его, когда сталкиваюсь с ним. Я ужасно противоречив. Если я не могу разобраться в себе, то вряд-ли мне кто-то ещё поможет.
custom 53598313152250203694custom 53728705052231917054custom 53731621420925284213
Тебе действительно лучше не знать, как мой мир пережил пару атомных бомб. Но я всегда буду рад видеть тебя в своих снах и оставаться для твоих глаз во тьме маяком. Так что меньше думай и не доверяй сплетням, я когда-нибудь тебе всё расскажу, пока я просто дым в твоей сигарете, в воздухе тихо тону
custom 53728705052231917054custom 53731621420925284214custom 53598313152250203693
Пусть я останусь лишь тенью в твоих ночных грезах. Там, где наши голоса сливались в нежные шепоты, а касание пальцев стало первым трепетом. Где дыхание наше, тяжелое от чувств, вызывало дрожь. Я тогда говорил, что каждый миг наполнен тобой, что жажду нашей встречи. Но все это развеялось. Ты разрушил это. Одним лишь словом, глядя в глаза, что были полны тобой. И по сей день все вокруг кричит о тебе. Легче было бы и…
custom 53728705052231917054custom 53731621420925284214custom 53598313152250203693
Я соскучился По тебе Звучит вполне сентиментально. Я соскучился по тебе Морально, Физически, На всех уровнях Сознания И мироздания
custom 537316214209252842110custom 53728705052231917056custom 53598313152250203695
❌❌❌❌❌🪷🪷 ❌❌❌❌❌🪷🪷
В сердце огонь, в глазах - светлый блик, Ты как магнит, держишь в плену, Одержимость, как вихрь, кружит вмиг, С тобою я, словно в непогоду. Словно звезда, ты в моем небе светишь, Твоя любовь -ненасытный крик, Я без тебя, как без солнца летний, Ты - мой покой и мой риск.
custom 53728705052231917056custom 53598313152250203694custom 53731621420925284214
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Z30o2o. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,298,519 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“30:29” (@Z30o2o), 30 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Z30o2o.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.