Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 又又💒(新人初次下海)

Channel

又又💒(新人初次下海)

@Yyyyy_520

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

190subscribers

+79 since we began measuring on 4 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004403111120
TypeChannel
Username@Yyyyy_520
Created4 July 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded4 September 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Yyyyy_520

Growth

111218164.54 September 2026 — 111 subscribers4 September 2026 — 111 subscribers6 September 2026 — 218 subscribers14 September 2026 — 190 subscribers1904 September 202614 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 10 days, net +79. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 95–234 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 07:36190-28
6 Sept 2026, 21:21218+107
4 Sept 2026, 10:22111no change
4 Sept 2026, 09:47111first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 4 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
189.0%
avg views ÷ 190 subscribers
Avg views / post
359
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 September 2026
Posts held15 (4 July 20264 September 2026)
Views total2,873
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Sept 2026, 10:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 50s
Average length
28s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 07:02 UTC359 views0 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Forwarded from @zzxshbg

💯 车评系统 | 评价模版 当前模版 郑州学生会报告模板 【妹子花名】:又又 【验证留名】:匿名 【人照得分】: 10 【颜值得分】: 10 【身材得分】: 10 【服务得分】: 9 【态度得分】: 10 【环境得分】: 10 【综合得分】: 9.83 【验证时间】:2026-09-03 【过程描述】:群里看到来了新妹妹,于是决定去体验一下。路程说实话不算近,跨了大半个郑州,位置好找,进门之后好家伙啊两条大长腿都快敢我命还长了。交了水费还没等寒暄呢妹妹就开始脱衣服了,身材是真不赖,身形高挑凹凸有致。主动帮洗陪浴,洗完后还给递一次性浴巾。上床之后妹妹就帮我口,口得很认真,丝毫没有齿感。妹妹还比较害羞,侧着身子,一边帮我口,我一只手在妹妹的大屁股和大长腿上反复游走。随即我提出六九,妹妹也是很配合地跨坐在我的脸上。映入眼帘的景象宛如室外桃园仙境一般,而所我寻求一生就是的便是那秘境仙境的洞口。都嫩的出水了,晶莹剔透

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @Yyyyy_520. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“又又💒(新人初次下海)” (@Yyyyy_520), 190 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Yyyyy_520.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.