Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

YumenaLi

@YumenaLi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

651subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001963344042
TypeChannel
Username@YumenaLi
Created30 June 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/YumenaLi

Growth

6516 Aug 2026, 19:32 — 651 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 05:28 — 651 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 19:327 Aug 2026, 05:28
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 650–652 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 05:28651no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:32651first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 29 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.0%
avg views ÷ 651 subscribers
Avg views / post
143
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.79%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026
Posts held16 (29 November 202526 July 2026)
Views total286
Reactions total28
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 19:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

715 reactions across 16 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
24033.6%
❤‍🔥14320.0%
custom 535931133212440355110614.8%
🔥466.43%
👀456.29%
💘354.90%
🙏344.76%
💋212.94%
152.10%
🥰101.40%
70.979%
🍓50.699%
👾30.42%
🕊20.28%
🎉10.14%
👌10.14%
🤩10.14%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 715reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 29 November 2025 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
24
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 16 we hold a reading for · 50%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @YumenaLi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 November 2025 to 26 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Jul 2026, 17:17 UTC144 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Сама то я словила артблок , вот на трудолюбивого художника посмотрите да поддержите

15❤‍🔥1

26 Jul 2026, 17:14 UTC142 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @niki_lili_hubPhoto

✧・゚: ✧・゚: Всем привет! 😍 Можете звать меня Рапи (Rapy/Rapynksel) 😍 ・゚✧*:・゚✧ Я художник, и если вам откликается мой стиль — буду рада видеть вас у себя в канале! Там я публикую: ✧ Свои арты и их процесс (если не забываю🤫), порой даже традишку ✧ Немного сторонней информации, мемы и что-то обо мне ✧ А ещё иногда я стример витюбер на Твиче и стримлю игры на русском и английском языках 🙂 Буду очень рада видеть каж

6❤‍🔥6

20 May 2026, 07:46 UTC408 views62 reactions5 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ура я успела к выходу Николь Мало того еще и выпала мне 😏 #полноценка

41💋8❤‍🔥7💘3custom 53593113321244035513

23 Apr 2026, 13:28 UTC549 views66 reactions6 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Я снова ворк 😒 Поэтому кое как стараюсь успевать рисовать Хотела блин к выходу Линнеи успеть 🤭 #полноценка@YumenaLi

❤‍🔥4013💋9🍓3🔥1

18 Mar 2026, 16:23 UTC653 views18 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

12❤‍🔥5🎉1

18 Mar 2026, 16:23 UTC607 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Сделала немного стикеров , прикольный процесс да и кажись полезно для тренировки 🤗

23❤‍🔥1

17 Mar 2026, 12:08 UTC608 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Кстати Раз у нас в 2026 такая пьянка 😒 Я начну, по крайней мере постараюсь , вести ВконТактЭ Так что милости прошу, к нашему шалашу

13👀3❤‍🔥1👌1🥰1

17 Mar 2026, 11:32 UTC555 views74 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ой ой ой а кто это зашевелился? Я просто уволилась 😏 Думала что смогу совмещать, но обычная работа высосала из меня всю энергию и душу. Ииии я разучилась рисовать за это время уже хах #полноценка

custom 535931133212440355141❤‍🔥19🥰9💋311

31 Dec 2025, 21:39 UTC789 views42 reactionsread 6 August 2026

с новым годом 👅

26❤‍🔥8🔥4custom 53593113321244035512💋1💘1

30 Dec 2025, 04:50 UTC854 views55 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Я в шоке ...

👀42💘54❤‍🔥2🍓2

29 Dec 2025, 13:46 UTC709 views45 reactions5 Starsread 6 August 2026
Video

Наткнулась на видео двухгодичной давности, и решила поделиться с вами своим еще одним хобби Извините за максимально домашний аутфит 😼 #синт

🔥287💘6❤‍🔥2🕊2

28 Dec 2025, 08:20 UTC601 views67 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ну что , с наступающим получается #полноценка

❤‍🔥43105💘5custom 53593113321244035512🔥1🤩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @YumenaLi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,330,716 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“YumenaLi” (@YumenaLi), 651 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/YumenaLi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.