Channel
@YourCryptoLibraryTA
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
401subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001234276350 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @YourCryptoLibraryTA |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/YourCryptoLibraryTA |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:36 | 401 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:01 | 402 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:54 | 402 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 April 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 September 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Some action at BTC is getting some movements back into the markets. Another nice opportunity is Decentraland #MANA. I see a very good risk/reward here. Remember metaverse only had it's bubble hype growth last year, next few years metaverse might see more stable growth... Target 1: $0,90 Target 2: $1,09 SL $0,69
Every major market bottom was formed between 400-600 days before halving (green). We are green now.. but also will be green for the next 200 days.
Soon.. bitcoin must choose direction… descending triangle getting tighter.
https://www.tradingview.com/x/aHqJot0Z/ https://www.tradingview.com/x/1mOL7ZsU/ https://www.tradingview.com/x/WcJpwZTk/ https://www.tradingview.com/x/2M1iSCOt/ - "First chart shows correlation between BTC VS DXY" ( DXY represents the orange line) - Second chart shows us the BTC price - Third chart visualises TOTALmarketcap - Fourth chart total2 1 Correlation between BTC tops and DXY bottoms and visa versa is absolut…
https://www.tradingview.com/x/Bi8qAXF9 I have buy orders ready for BTC around CMP and 30000 area if it gets that low. Golden opportunity
https://www.tradingview.com/x/ZUsHabPo Ok let’s observe what just happend: Stocks went down big time like the nasdaq. #DXY went up big time, and it’s approaching dangerous levels. We made a fake breakout to the upside and got rejected around 40k zone. BTC broke through 37500 levels but it’s trying to flip it as we speak. We bounced from 36500 support zone and it looks like its going to hold for now. Personally, I…
Free call
https://www.tradingview.com/x/QLA9wPgT #matic Bounced from 3day demand area. We are going to accumulate it slowly as I want to use a quite big SL. Buy range 1,15-1,18 Dca level 1 1,05-1.10 Target 1 1,21 Target 2 1,25 Target 3 1,29 Target 4 1,34 Target 5 1,40 Target 6 1,50 Sl 4h close below 1,02 Risk: medium
https://www.tradingview.com/x/9cafUO0I/ #BTC on its ways to flip 39100 👀
#BTC once again bouncing from trendline + support. Also take a look at that RSI pointing upwards and breaking out, after showing bullish divergence first. I think we might be heading towards 40-42k area. Bullish view invalidated with a break below $37550.
https://www.tradingview.com/x/sPxQqQeF Broke support and now we’re testing a pretty important area. If we cannot hold 37500 than their is a big big chance of testing 34500 IMO
https://www.tradingview.com/x/7VNfkFjv My target got reached exactly, and thats where we got rejected as well. So what now? Either we’re going to test 38400 zone again find some support and move back up. Or, we are going to test 37500 again. Stay tuned 🐺
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @YourCryptoLibraryTA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,215,497 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“YourCryptoLibrary - TA Calls (Public)” (@YourCryptoLibraryTA), 401 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/YourCryptoLibraryTA.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.