Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

YourAnonUKRIR

@YourAnonChannel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

207subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001963543845
TypeChannel
Username@YourAnonChannel
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/YourAnonChannel

Growth

207208207.57 August 2026 — 208 subscribers8 August 2026 — 208 subscribers15 August 2026 — 207 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 207–208 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 20:27207-1
8 Aug 2026, 11:05208no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:32208first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 5 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
28s
Average length
28s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

10 reactions across 4 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
440.0%
🍌220.0%
👍220.0%
👎110.0%
🤡110.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2025 to 3 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Apr 2026, 12:53 UTC138 viewsread 8 August 2026

YourAnonUKRIR For four years, the Iranian regime has supported Russia's war effort, helping sustain a conflict that has brought nothing but suffering for Ukrainian civilians. Throughout this time, we have worked to expose and disrupt the networks behind this cooperation. Iran has now publicly declared war on Ukraine just because we tried to help other countries save lives of innocent civilians. Now, we declare war ba

28 Jan 2026, 09:21 UTC196 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Thanks to our brave friends, we uncovered everything we needed to reveal this training. A single leaked flight opened the door to a classified program that shows, once again, how Iran props up a collapsing Russian army dragging its feet across our land. We said we would expose them — and we did. We said more was coming — and we delivered. We keep our promises. Stand with Putin, and you stand in the light. https://ste

14 Oct 2025, 11:43 UTC287 viewsread 8 August 2026

This is how it started in Ukraine. In Georgia. Everywhere Putin decided to invade. The world still thinks his threats, his drones crossing borders, and his “little green men” are just posturing. They’re not.

8 Oct 2025, 16:25 UTC290 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

From Kyiv to Gaza. Two flags, one faith. All genocides must end.

3🤡1

7 Oct 2025, 12:26 UTC215 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

We’ve all seen how sanctions on paper work out. Oligarchs keep their yachts. Factories keep running. The war keeps going. You know what actually works? Turning oil refineries into smoking craters. They don’t care about human lives. Not about justice, or ideals. Only money. Ukrainian sanctions > Western statements.

4 Oct 2025, 14:05 UTC179 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

We make it a point to highlight the people doing the real work — not the loudest, but the most effective. 🇺🇦 Nebo Peremohy (@NeboPeremohy) — “Sky of Victory” — is one of those groups. While others make speeches, they make drones. They assemble, train, deliver — FPV drones, repeaters, jamming protection, mobile ground stations — and they get them to the units that need them fast. These aren't government contracts or

2 Oct 2025, 12:57 UTC161 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Remember the tsunami bomb? The one that was supposed to drown entire continents? (Including half of Russia, by the way.) Or the laser cannons? The invisible T‑14 Armata? The nuclear-powered cruise missile? The space-nuke torpedo that never even left the dock? The Russian high command is so delusional, they still think they’re fighting the Nazis in 1943. Now they’ve deployed the Su‑57, their only working "super weapo

23 Sept 2025, 17:49 UTC167 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Where there’s blood, there are Russian weapons. Iran’s missiles? Russian tech.North Korea’s nukes? Russian scientists. Syria’s gas attacks? Russian planes. Venezuela’s air defense? Moscow made. From Tehran to Pyongyang — always the same.Russia doesn’t “support” tyrants. It builds them. Arms them. Shields them. This goes way beyond Ukraine.

👎1

10 Sept 2025, 18:32 UTC187 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

No one should be surprised if Russia attacks NATO members. Everyone knows they’re war-mongering orcs — and so far, there have been no real consequences. For all Putin cares, he could launch 200 drones into neighboring countries, and nothing would happen.

3 Sept 2025, 11:11 UTC≈1,710 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

1🍌1👍1

3 Sept 2025, 11:10 UTC≈2,400 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

The exposure of Vadim Malov and his friends by Hooshyaran1 and Reuters caught our attention. After relentless work and with the help of some very good people, we have discovered why the RuZZian military visited Iran, and who is responsible. Iran, as always, denies any direct role in the killing of Ukrainians — but we all know a group of Russian military officers doesn’t fly to Iran for a vacation. Between June 6t

🍌1👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @YourAnonChannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 439,899 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“YourAnonUKRIR” (@YourAnonChannel), 207 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/YourAnonChannel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.