Channel
@YliaBelay
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
41subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002292971905 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @YliaBelay |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/YliaBelay |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:08 | 41 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 42 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 42 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 43 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 17 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
54 reactions across 11 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 28 | 51.9% | |
| ❤ | 17 | 31.5% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 16.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 17 December 2025 to 6 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Почему следы от банок на спине разного цвета? Особенно если поставить пару литровых. Будет два пятна разного цвета. Не нужно этого пугаться😁 Изучим: 👣 Что такое пятно от банки? Это не кровоподтек -класса синяк, где скапливается из разорванных сосудов кровь, а потом сворачивается. 👣 След от банки называют петехия. Данные штуки возникают в результате капиллярных т.е. микро кровоизлияний из-за структурных измене…
❤4👍3🔥1
Video, posted without a caption
🔥2
После снятия банок картина бывает разная, где особые процессы -бордовеет и даже синяки. А где-то наоборот светлый центр но с выводом жидкости, прям капельки.. 💦
👍2
Photo, posted without a caption
И деткам и взрослым ПОЛЕЗНЫ БАНОЧКИ 🔥🔥🔥 Они просты в применении, а работают просто волшебно, известны с давних пор, а сейчас ещё и просты в использовании. 😁😁😁 Снимаю отечность, выводят лишнюю воду, застои, расслабляют 🌶️ спазмы, зажатости, восполнения глубинные. Полезно ВСЕМ иметь дома такое чудо -здоровье без пилюль 💊💊💊. И почаще применять, потянули ли мышцу, продуло ли, сковало ли от стресса, и просто для улуч…
❤4
Сегодня был массаж для прекрасной Натальи. 😊 Животик был немного отёчен и очень уплотнён, не сразу удалось промассировать органы, хотя Наталья стройняшка. 🙌 Начали с подготовки и расслабления диафрагмы. На глазах живот обмяк, вот так мы порой думаем что всё Ок, а висцеральный массаж нужен каждому и как можно чаще😁 Так было еще в давней Руси, предки знали толк в здоровье и правке тела, даже в условиях размеренной…
🔥6👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥5
Уже сегодня! 🥳 29 декабря 🎄наше шоу РSY-стендап, где будет много веселья, 🎁 подарков от спонсоров 🎁 и праздничного настроения! Приходи разделить с нами этот вечер в караоке-бар Маэстро, Каменская 32🤩 Шоу-программа 19:00-21:00 и афтепати караоке до утра 🎤 29 декабря, 19:00 📍Каменская, 32, караоке-бар «Маэстро» 💰2500₽, из них 1500₽ -депозит в бар Пиши организатору Кате @Ekaterina_Angelskaya и говори, что идешь ко…
Всех приглашаю душевно проведем время, а после остаёмся 😉 в караоке 🎤 🎼🔥🔥🔥😁😜😜
🔥1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤1
🎄Вход в «Круг доверия» — это инвестиция в ваш личный прорыв. Вот что вы получите 29 декабря на PSY - STAND UP - развлекательном шоу в караоке - бар "Маэстро" 🎄: Ваша выгода: 1️⃣ Готовые решения от 5+ спикеров. Не теория, а личные истории преодоления. Вы унесете инсайты и инструменты для карьеры, отношений и жизни. 2️⃣ Сильное окружение. Вы попадете в атмосферу доверия и роста, где знакомства могут стать новым эт…
❤3
Posted without readable text
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @YliaBelay. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,409,919 of 1,629,535 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@YliaBelay named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Юлия Белых🧚♀” (@YliaBelay), 41 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/YliaBelay.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.