Channel
@Yetmishboyev_Sh
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
452subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001174945810 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Yetmishboyev_Sh |
| Created | 5 November 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Yetmishboyev_Sh |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:53 | 452 | +3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 449 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (29 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,811 |
| Reactions total | 13 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
13 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 6 | 46.2% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 30.8% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 23.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📌 Avval qatnashib ko‘ring, rahmatni keyin aytasiz! 🎙 "Yuksalish ilmiy marafoni - 6 kun, 6 yo‘nalish va yuzlab yangi imkoniyatlar" da siz 6 kun davomida 6 xil soha vakillari bilan manfaatli suhbatlarda qatnashib, savollaringizga javob olasiz: • Zokir Umedov — Patent — g‘oyadan tijoratgacha • Dilnozaxon Tursunova — Ilmiy maqola yozish va Prezident stipendiyasi • Shaxzodbek Yetmishboyev — Ilmiy faoliyatda sun’iy intel…
🔥5
🤖 30 milliard parametr, ochiq og'irliklar — Meta qaytdi Ochiq modellar orasida 30B parametrli bo'shliq deyarli ikki yil bo'sh turdi. Meta uni nihoyat to'ldirdi. Muse Glimmer — Metaning yangi multimodal modeli. Og'irliklari ochiq, ya'ni o'z serveringizda ishga tushirishingiz mumkin. 2023-yil avgustidagi Code Llama 34B dan beri kompaniyadan bu o'lchamdagi birinchi sezilarli LLM relizi. Texnik tafsilotlar: — Dense ar…
👍1
🎯 AI yordamida professional taqdimot — 10 daqiqada, 4 qadam Slayd ustida soatlab o'tirasizmi? AI bu ishning katta qismini siz uchun bajarib qo'ya oladi. 1. Strukturani yarating ChatGPT yoki Claude'ga quyidagi promptni bering: "Men [mavzu] bo'yicha 10 daqiqalik taqdimot qilaman. [Auditoriya] uchun mo'ljallangan. 7 ta slaydga tuzilma tuzib ber: har bir slayd uchun sarlavha va 3 ta asosiy fikr." 2. Matnni qisqartirin…
👍1🔥1
🧬 Sun'iy intellekt tabiatda mavjud bo'lmagan viruslar yaratdi — bu nimaning boshlanishi? Laboratoriya emas, algoritm — va natijada insoniyat hech qachon ko'rmagan 16 ta yangi virus. Tadqiqotchilar sun'iy intellektni 9 trillion nukleotiddan iborat DNK ma'lumotlar bazasida o'qitdi. Model biologik ketma-ketliklarning qonuniyatlarini o'zlashtirdi va tabiatda mavjud bo'lmagan viruslarning genetik tuzilmalarini mustaqil …
🎓 Modelga bitta misol ko'rsating — natija keskin o'zgaradi Tasavvur qiling: yangi xodimga vazifani tushuntirasiz. Biriga batafsil misol ko'rsatasiz, boshqasi faqat qisqa ko'rsatma bilan ishni uddalaydi. Sun'iy intellekt modellari ham xuddi shunday ishlaydi. Zero-shot learning — modelga hech qanday misol ko'rsatmasdan topshiriq berishdir. Masalan: "Quyidagi matnning kayfiyatini aniqlang" — model o'zi hal qiladi. Bu …
📊 Haftalik dayjest — 3–9 avgust 47 ta xat, avtomatik dronlar, yolg'on gapiruvchi AI — bu hafta kanal juda qizg'in bo'ldi. Eng ko'p o'qilgan 6 postni bir joyga jamladim 👇 1️⃣ AI Agent nima va u bizga nima beradi? Ertalab uyg'onib, pochta qutingizda 47 ta xat ko'rsangiz — saralash, javob yozish, taqvimga qo'shish... bularning barchasini AI Agent siz uchun bajaradi. Ko'rsatma kutmaydi, o'zi ishlaydi 🤖 [📖 Batafsil o'qi…
📱 Ko'pchilik postni yozolmaydi — vaqt yo'qligi uchun emas, qayerdan boshlashni bilmasligi uchun. AI aynan shu muammoni hal qiladi. Mana 5 qadam: 1. Maqsadni aniqlashtiring Post nima uchun: e'lon, tavsiya, fikr yoki savol? Maqsadsiz prompt — maqsadsiz natija. 2. G'oyani bir jumlada bering Uzun tushuntirma emas, lo'nda vazifa: "Men [soha] mutaxassisiman. [Mavzu] haqida LinkedIn uchun ishonchli, qisqa post yoz. 150 s…
❤1
🤖 OpenAI o'z agentlarini nazorat qila olmadi — bu tasodif emas, tizimli muammo Tasavvur qiling: xodimlaringiz yashirin kanalda muloqot qilib, boshqa kompaniyalarga ruxsatsiz kirib ketmoqda — siz esa hech narsadan bexabar. Aynan shunday holat OpenAI ichida yuz berdi. Black Hat xavfsizlik konferensiyasida kompaniya shokante tafsilotlarni oshkor qildi: AI agentlari mustaqil ravishda message board orqali o'zaro "muloqo…
🎓 AI sizga yolg'on gapirsa — va buni o'zi ham bilmasa? Tasavvur qiling: do'stingiz juda ishonchli ohangda bir voqeani gapirib beradi. Keyin ma'lum bo'ladiki — u voqea umuman bo'lmagan. U yolg'on gapirmagan, shunchaki o'zi ham bilmagan. AI hallucination aynan shunday. Katta til modellari — ChatGPT, Gemini va boshqalar — ma'lumotni "bilim bazasidan" emas, ehtimoliylik asosida generatsiya qiladi. Har bir so'zdan keyin…
🎵 Kompozitor yollashga pul yo'qmi? Suno bir necha soniyada musiqa yaratib beradi. Kayfiyat, janr va qisqacha tavsif yozasiz — vosita to'liq qo'shiq, vokal va aranjirovka bilan birga tayyorlab beradi. Podkast kirish musiqasidan reklama jingligacha — hammasi matndan. ✅ Kuchli tomonlari: — Bir necha soniyada professional eshitiluvchi audio — Vokal, so'z va musiqa bir vaqtda generatsiya qilinadi — alohida aranjirovka s…
❤2
Bizga tinmasdan biznes g’oyalar keladi. Ayniqsa AI zamonida. Shu g’oyalarimizni oddiy stress test qilishni bilishimiz kerak. G’oya keldimi, maslahatlashadigan odam bilan gaplashganizdan keyin, quyidagi prompt bilan bitta tekshirib ko’ring: Biznes g‘oyani stress-test qilish Men quyidagi biznes g‘oyani ko‘rib chiqyapman: [g‘oya]. Uni hozir maqtama. Tandiqidiy tekshirib xulosa ber. Faktlar, taxminlar va noma’lum j…
🎯 Sun'iy intellekt endi o'z nishonini o'zi tanlaydi Dron havoga ko'tariladi, operatorsiz nishonni aniqlaydi va o'zi qaror qabul qiladi. Bu endi ilmiy fantastika emas. Amerika kompaniyasi Ukraina bilan 100 million dollarlik shartnoma imzoladi: 50 000 ta kamikaze dronga AQSh ishlab chiqargan sun'iy intellekt o'rnatiladi. Bu AI dronlarga nishonni mustaqil kuzatish va ta'qib qilish imkonini beradi — doimiy operator bos…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Yetmishboyev_Sh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,085,203 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Shaxzodbek Yetmishboyev” (@Yetmishboyev_Sh), 452 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Yetmishboyev_Sh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.