Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

^Yᥱ᧐ᥒg–i

@Yeong_ii

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

59subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003263805764
TypeChannel
Username@Yeong_ii
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Yeong_ii

Growth

5911 Aug 2026, 00:47 — 59 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 15:17 — 59 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 00:4711 Aug 2026, 15:17
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 58–60 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 15:1759no change
11 Aug 2026, 00:4759first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
84.7%
avg views ÷ 59 subscribers
Avg views / post
50.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
30.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026
Posts held20 (19 February 202622 July 2026)
Views total50
Reactions total15
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 00:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

231 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53236517004294481823916.9%
custom 53236463918498704783816.5%
💘3213.9%
🦄2410.4%
custom 5819019282591257835239.96%
custom 5267299053741309659187.79%
custom 5314696947020365397156.49%
custom 5474610759977701210104.33%
😈104.33%
custom 526727476570125265293.90%
👾83.46%
custom 531477602595821762752.16%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 231reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 February 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Jul 2026, 15:53 UTC50 views15 reactionsread 11 August 2026

<New Post> Подвезу бомжа, мне его жаль🥺 Это тупо мы с Су-хо в другой реальности. Я такая крутая, езжу на мотоцикле, рядом присоседился какой-то мальчик. Забавно быть каким-то уличным поваром со своим прилавком в игре и видеть таких клиентов, мне понравилось, жаль не лапшу готовили❤

custom 58190192825912578357custom 52672990537413096594👾2💘2

9 Jul 2026, 07:40 UTC89 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 58190192825912578351

9 Jul 2026, 07:39 UTC79 views13 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🍎<New Post> 🤩з-за того, что у Су-хо праздник, я решила, что просто купить открытку - это скучно. Я же должна удивлять? Поэтому главный подарок уже готов. Костюм человека-паука. 🤩а, тот самый, в обтяжку. 🤩очему? Потому что он тот ещё супергерой, даже если сам этого не осознает. И вообще, мне просто нужно посмотреть на его лицо, когда он это наденет.. Без приколов никуда ☆ ° . ⁺ ·ㅤ☆ ₊ ࣭ ☆ ๋

custom 52672990537413096595custom 58190192825912578354🦄2😈2

14 Jun 2026, 16:00 UTC100 views18 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🍣<New Post> 🤩ам-пам-пам 🤩от вечер на пляже и правда был тёплым! И угадайте, с кем? С Хо-Су! Мы вроде недавно знакомы.. Для меня уже вечность, но меня почему-то сразу потянуло позвать его именно туда. Погода будто шептала: "🤩авай, Ён-И, будет красиво." 🔤 он согласился! Вы не представляете, как я обрадовалась. Одной гулять.. ну, можно, но вдвоём совсем по-другому, не так пусто. Мы ходили по песку, и я… тараторила, на

custom 58190192825912578356custom 52672990537413096595💘3🦄3😈1

16 May 2026, 15:30 UTC114 views15 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🖤<New Post> Ⲡⲣⲟⲅⲩⲗⲕⲁ ⲥ Ⲭⲟⲥⲩ 🤩сё ещё не верится, что он согласился! Когда я ляпнула "пошли на фестиваль", Хосу завис, что было видно по нему. Я уже открыла рот, собираясь сказать: "забей, можно и просто в парке", но он тут же кивнул. И я подумала, либо ему правда интересно, либо неудобно отказывать. Но спорить не стала, раз согласился, то обратного пути нет. ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 🤩ервое, куда мы пошли - это палатка с тток

custom 58190192825912578355custom 52672990537413096594😈3💘2🦄1

13 May 2026, 15:26 UTC113 views17 reactionsread 11 August 2026

⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ...Тᴀᴋ чᴛᴏ буду нᴀдᴇяᴛьᴄя, чᴛᴏ ʙ ᴄᴀʍый ᴨᴏᴄᴧᴇдний ʍᴏʍᴇнᴛ ᴏн нᴇ ᴏᴛᴋᴀжᴇᴛᴄя. А ᴛᴏ ʍᴀᴧᴏ ᴧи, ʙдᴩуᴦ ᴏн нᴇ ᴧюбиᴛᴇᴧь ɯуʍных ɸᴇᴄᴛиʙᴀᴧᴇй и ʙᴄᴇй ϶ᴛᴏй ᴋуᴛᴇᴩьʍы? Нᴏ ᴇᴦᴏ ʙᴄё ᴩᴀʙнᴏ нᴇ ᴄᴨᴩᴀɯиʙᴀᴧи. Еᴄᴧи нᴇ хᴏчᴇᴛ — ɜнᴀчиᴛ, ɜᴀхᴏчᴇᴛ. Я ᴄᴇᴩьёɜнᴏ. Инᴏᴦдᴀ ᴋᴏʍу-ᴛᴏ ᴨᴩᴏᴄᴛᴏ нужᴇн ᴨᴏʙᴏд ʙыбᴩᴀᴛьᴄя иɜ ɜᴏны ᴋᴏʍɸᴏᴩᴛᴀ. А ᴄᴋучᴀᴛь ʙ ᴏдинᴏчᴇᴄᴛʙᴇ ᴏн ʙᴄᴇᴦдᴀ уᴄᴨᴇᴇᴛ. Тᴀᴋ чᴛᴏ ᴨуᴄᴛь ᴦᴏᴛᴏʙиᴛᴄя: ᴨᴏᴨᴋᴏᴩн, ʍуɜыᴋᴀ, ᴏᴦни и ʍᴏя бᴏᴧᴛᴏʙня ᴇʍу ᴏбᴇᴄᴨᴇчᴇ

custom 53236463918498704785custom 53236517004294481825🦄4😈2💘1

13 May 2026, 15:23 UTC111 views18 reactionsread 11 August 2026

💋<New Post> ૮Ꮚ ┈ . ◌ ┈ ⭑ . ° ┈ ° . ◌ Значит так! У меня есть отличная новость. Прямо очень радостная, я бы даже сказала, что счастливая. И она заслуживает отдельного названия. ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ Помните, пару недель назад тот неловкий случай в магазине? Когда я по своей глупости перепутала одного парня с Сухо… до сих пор стыдно вспоминать. Но знаете что? Всё, к счастью, закончилось хорошо. И самое

custom 53236517004294481826💘4🦄3custom 53236463918498704783👾2

3 May 2026, 08:39 UTC105 views18 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🐈‍⬛<New Post> ૮Ꮚ ┈ . ◌ ┈ ⭑ . ° ┈ ° . ◌ Вчера вечером, пока я сидела на кухне, попивая кофе, в голову пришла неожиданная мысль. "Почему бы мне не узнать Хосу получше?" Имя его я, конечно, запомнила, но на этом всё и закончилось. Звучит нелепо. ☆ ° . ⁺ ·ㅤ☆ ₊ ࣭ ☆ ๋ ⌒ ゚ Честно говоря, я пробовала подойти к этому и раньше, но дела наваливались, и это не отговорка. А се

💘5custom 53236463918498704784custom 53236517004294481824👾3🦄1😈1

22 Apr 2026, 11:38 UTC137 views25 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🐈‍⬛<New Post > ૮Ꮚ ┈ . ◌ ┈ ⭑ . ° ┈ ° . ◌ В последнее время я совсем затерялась между делами, заботами и ерундой, которая незаметно съедает дни. Да-да. То работа, то встречи с друзьями, то зал, Всё это наваливается друг на друга, не оставляя ни минуты на выдох. Одни дела-а-а... если можно так сказать вообще. ☆ ° . ⁺ ·ㅤ☆ ₊ ࣭ ☆ ๋ ⌒ ゚ И вот, на фоне всего этого, у меня

custom 53236463918498704789custom 53236517004294481827🦄5💘2👾1😈1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Yeong_ii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 132,569 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“^Yᥱ᧐ᥒg–i” (@Yeong_ii), 59 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Yeong_ii.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.