Channel
@YashasEdu
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
752subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002730682317 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @YashasEdu |
| Description | I bring you data that hasn't reached your feed yet. Explained quickly & simply. X: https://x.com/yashasedu All posts are written purely for information purposes, not investment advice. |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/YashasEdu |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 752 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:27 | 752 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (5 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,362 |
| Reactions total | 18 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 02:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
18 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 14 | 77.8% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 11.1% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 5.56% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 5.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
I believe real power starts with how we show up. We should never say no to good chances or talk bad about ourselves and always aim high. Saying this cuz power begins with how people see us and we become what we care about and when others see us as people who get things done, stay practical and know our stuff, they want to join us and that’s how strong connections are formed. Which is how eventually people become i…
❤2
$PONS revenue seems to be establishing a range with today's numbers looking to come in around ~70k est not too bad considering the pools vamp. expecting xRev numbers to fall here slightly over the next days as it measures 7d avg basis +new metric otw (% share of pad vol etc.)
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
Just noticed that @tradexyz was not creating new trading volume for @HyperliquidX. It was mostly moving existing volume from HL's high fee crypto markets into its own lower fee stock and commodity markets. ➥ In July, TradeXYZ volume rose 37% while HL' core markets fell 40% ➥ Buybacks of $HYPE dropped 33% ➥ OI has grown to $3.7B and now makes up 35% of all HL' OI The reason was TradeXYZ charges much lower fees. HL k…
Bitcoin is Currently in a Very Undervalued Zone “From a cycle perspective, Bitcoin appears to have reached a position similar to its historical bottoms of the past.” – Read More By Crypto Dan | @cryptoquant_official
Whenever investing in AI x crypto tokens, think in layers of coordination failure that blockchain + incentives can address. ↳ Compute layer ↳ Training layer ↳ Coordination/intelligence markets ↳ Inference + verification ↳ Data layer ↳ Agent + payment layer Remember the deep connection to the commoditization thesis is that every time centralized AI hits a wall, it creates an opening👇 1. Export controls → train smar…
❤3
So @OndoPerps adding GLDon and SLVon as collateral is not a random upgrade. Gold has been the busiest market on the platform, yet traders could not post the metal itself as margin. This changes the structure as holders of tokenized gold/silver can now keep their spot exposure and use it to back perps on gold, silver, equities or oil, all in one account. Saying this because the real edge always is the closed loop c…
❤1
For those who don’t know this is a key crypto market dynamic i.e shrinking turnover can reflect strong conviction among remaining holders. I’ll share how to read it properly and everything about it in an article soon
👍1
I look at @Zcash and it does not feel like the usual privacy hype to me. BTC fell ~44% over the last 10 months while ZEC roughly 2x, lifting the ratio from 0.45 to 7.68 milli-BTC for a 17 times relative gain and daily turnover collapsed from 22.5% of market cap down to ~2.4%. Here's what the data says👇 ➥ Roughly 30-35% of supply is now locked in the shielded pool (Grayscale trust, Cypherpunk holdings and the proto…
❤1
Some context: Almost 890K BTC moved in a week while the price stayed completely flat. Holders are being forced to abandon single vendor seeds after the Coldcard flaw and this migration is going to distort every age based onchain signal for the next few months.
Most people are still reacting to the Coldcard mess where instead they should be locking down their own stack with the next layer of protection. @Agonybeard just addressed it with a solution. So if you hold your own keys, this is the one worth watching right now. (PS the video is in English) https://youtu.be/vL6nF2bLoq0
if you're new to AI stocks than follow these account for daily content and alpha..(i've been observing their content closely and i feel they cover plenty of great insights) - @StockSavvyShay - @MilkRoadStocks - @The_AI_Investor - @amitisinvesting - @pequityresearch - @tengyanAI - @firstadopter - @CKCapitalxx - @jiahanjimliu - @jasonschips - @demian_ai - @SemiconductorsX - @SemiAnalysis_ - @KobeissiLetter - @MelvinIn…
🔥2😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @YashasEdu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@YashasEdu named 9 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“YashasEdu’ Digest” (@YashasEdu), 752 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/YashasEdu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.