Channel
@Yaomomolover
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
24subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003159678516 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Yaomomolover |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Yaomomolover |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:02 | 24 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:30 | 24 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
256 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 118 | 46.1% | |
| custom 5467569255585161056 | 47 | 18.4% | |
| custom 6183976535066677640 | 40 | 15.6% | |
| 💋 | 24 | 9.38% | |
| custom 5415603076176318781 | 10 | 3.91% | |
| 🙏 | 9 | 3.52% | |
| custom 5350715573556765167 | 4 | 1.56% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 1.56% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 256reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 December 2025 to 5 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Прошу прощения за то, что блог превратился в гущу разбора и скандала. 🙏 После того, как конфликт будет улажен, я буду его вести без лишностей ВНЕ сеток. Я, скажем так, выступаю от лица всех милых саппортов, которые так же и являются моими хорошими приятелями. И молчать я, как очевидно не собираюсь. Ещё раз прошу прощения, и спасибо за ваше терпение!
❤12
Свои вопросы вы можете задать в комментариях 👇 Отвечу не только я, но и другие саппорты. Так же, по возможности можете распространить этот ответ тоже. Так как я заметила, что у многих саппортов различаются подписчики, не знаю увидят ли все.
❤9
🎏 1. Вы только подтвердили сказанное мною. И так, к слову, напомню вам, что вы предприняли меры только когда люди взбунтовались, а не спокойно говорили, что у них как минимум не получится присутствовать во время ивента, так как праздники как никак. Вспомните хотя бы меня? Я вам сказала, что не хочу участвовать в ивенте, но вы настояли на этом «он обязательный и крутой» 2. Почему вы пытаетесь оправдаться ВЫ ИЗНАЧАЛЬ…
❤10
Добрый день, дорогие. Как вы уже видели «Оправдания» на главном канале, я готова ответить на них. Только чуть позже крупным постом. Причиной тому является моё личное самочувствие, благодарю за понимание.
❤7
Этот год был неприятным, тяжёлым для меня.. И думаю, для многих из вас. Но мы выжили! Мы смогли! Вы все большие молодцы! Я по истине счастлива. Спасибо любимым активным и тихим зрителям на канале, да, вы все мои дети. Такие смешные все, заставляете меня улыбаться. Заставляете чувствовать по истине.. важной и любимой! С Новым 2026 годом! Пусть этот год подарит вам только счастье!💋
❤11💋5🥰4
Подобных случаев было МНОГО как по словам САМИХ саппортов, ей богу, спросите у всех и каждый второй вам расскажет.
custom 546756925558516105611custom 61839765350666776406❤4
☺️рузья, распространите данную ситуацию, прошу, не молчите. Саппорты Бх очень долго терпели, очень долго молчали. ЭТА СИТУАЦИЯ ДОЛЖНА БЫТЬ ОГЛАСОВАНА ВОКРУГЕ! Большое спасибо !!🙂
❤12custom 61839765350666776402
Привет, дорогие. Пишу, так называемую бригаду « что за ивент в бх» «что за геноцид?» Ивент заключает в себя то, что некий взломщик через второй аккаунт Незу, отправляет всем письма на горнолыжный курорт. Там же будет какой то ебать купол блокирующий причуду, анонимка наш приглашает так же на курорт и злодеев. Ивент был НЕ ДОПИСАН, без деталей. Нам буквально предъявили его сырым. «ну вот домики, вот сюжет, вот наста…
❤21custom 54675692555851610566custom 61839765350666776406
☺️уть позже я выкатаю пост и объясню массовый уход, дорогие. Хотите? 😶
❤3🙏2custom 54675692555851610562custom 61839765350666776402
☺️инсо вернись ко мне, я набью татуировку на лбу
custom 54675692555851610564❤2
☺️дравствуйте, мои дорогие. Предложите сетки по мга, в которые этот блог может переехать.
💋6custom 54675692555851610562❤1
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ✨ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 😀ℴ𝓂ℴ 𝒴𝒶ℴ𝓎ℴ𝓇ℴ𝓏𝓊 👸✨ 🤩обрый день, дорогие! Знаете, пишу вам, честно, не просто так, а с.. Новостью! Благодаря вдохновению от госпожи Полночи, в моей голове родилась совершенно новая, захватывающая идея – изучить строение и состав дымовых шашек с эффектом снотворного! Эта мысль пришла спонтанно, но я почувствовала, что не могу её просто так пропустить. Я уже умею создавать обычные дымовые шашки,…
❤6custom 54675692555851610563custom 61839765350666776403💋2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Yaomomolover. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 436,219 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Yaomomolover named 7 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🪭 𝙈𝙤𝙢𝙤 𝙔𝙖𝙤𝙮𝙤𝙧𝙤𝙯𝙪 | 𝙤𝙛𝙛𝙞𝙘𝙞𝙖𝙡 𝙗𝙡𝙤𝙜 🎏” (@Yaomomolover), 24 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Yaomomolover.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.