5 measurements spanning 17 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 477–483 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
23 Aug 2026, 00:38
480
-2
14 Aug 2026, 17:48
482
+2
6 Aug 2026, 19:50
480
+2
6 Aug 2026, 19:01
478
no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:47
478
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
105.2%
avg views ÷ 480 subscribers
Avg views / post
505
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.23%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held
17 (29 June 2026 – 4 August 2026)
Views total
1,010
Reactions total
73
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 19:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
395 reactions across 16 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
155
39.2%
🔥
129
32.7%
🤣
42
10.6%
🎉
34
8.61%
👍
11
2.78%
❤🔥
7
1.77%
👀
6
1.52%
😁
3
0.759%
🦄
3
0.759%
💯
2
0.506%
🆒
1
0.253%
🌭
1
0.253%
🫡
1
0.253%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 395reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Моему Ютуб каналу 3 года сегодня!
Канал дал мне то, о чем я даже не мечтал вначале. Ранее я просто сидел и двигал вертексы на пончике. Сегодня же я знаком с Марией Панфиловой и говорю по душам с Сиамаком.
Но. Всего этого не было бы без вас. Спасибо вам!
Дальше будет больше гостей и контента. В планах дорваться до самой верхушки индустрии. Оставайтесь со мной и мы вместе пройдем через интересные события индустрии 🤗
А вы верите в переселение душ?
У нас был кот Мурзик, который любил сидеть на столбе как Бэтмен. После его смерти, мы взяли Барсика, который по характеру был подозрительно похож на Мурзика. И вот недавно мы также нашли его на этом же столбе 🧐
Кстати, завтра на Спикинг клабе мы будем вместе сдавать аудирование Кембриджского экзамена KET (А2) и PET (B1).
Если хотите к нам, пишите мне сюда @yanisdoes
Всем привет. Из новостей вкратце:
- Вчера простоял полтора часа в очереди за бензином (вот так и живём сейчас)
- Ел сливу и расколол зуб о косточку (впервые за 35 лет)
- Добавилось три новых студента. Очень разные и очень интересные люди
- На след неделе записываю подкаст с новой гостьей. На этот раз подкаст на русском.
А как проходят ваши дни?
Новый подкаст на английском. Много лет назад этот товарищ делал ревью портфелей и буквально уничтожил мой портфель. Пришло время спросить с него за это 🧐
Если без шуток - художник крутой, препод отличный. Буду рад, если поставите лайк и коммент)
https://youtu.be/17HtN_ebR0Y
СПИКИНГ КЛАБ СЕГОДНЯ В 19:00 МСК!!!
Приходите и приводите друзей. Можно даже просто послушать)
Несмотря на то, что все силы пока уходят на Summer camp, думаю все таки устраивать такие встречи хотя бы раз в месяц.
Ссылку, как обычно, скину сюда за 5 мин до начала
Сегодня на Спикинг клабе к нам пришел Евгений Лаур из Юбисофт и показал чудеса оптимизации. Ну и попрактиковали английский, конечно же)
Присоединиться к нам вы можете тут @yanisdoes
Ребята, нужна помощь с оплатой зарубежного сервиса!
Цена вопроса - 47 Евро.
Взамен могу предложить:
- Два индивидуальных урока английского
- Рублевый эквивалент на росс карту
Если что, пишите сюда @yanisdoes
Я отжал у племянников Xbox. Брат жаловался, что он купил, а они не играют. В итоге я пришёл с коробкой и на их глазах упаковал её. Дядя года считай)
Ps. Уже начал RDR2
🤣36👍6❤1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Yanis_Does. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Я тут начал использовать ИИ для обложек. Нужно ваше мнение
Старые обложки были норм63%
Новые ИИ-обложки норм16%
Нужен новый дизаин, но без ИИ13%
Нужен новый дизаин, можно с ИИ8%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Yanis Salimov” (@Yanis_Does), 480 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Yanis_Does.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.