Сомневались только дилетанты 😂

Channel
#ЯСудья
@YaSudja
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
635subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001235689462 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @YaSudja |
| Created | 11 December 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/YaSudja |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 635 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:32 | 637 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:58 | 637 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 15 March 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
174 reactions across 14 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 94 | 54.0% | |
| 🤡 | 37 | 21.3% | |
| 👎 | 20 | 11.5% | |
| ❤ | 11 | 6.32% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 2.87% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 1.72% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 0.575% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.575% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.575% | |
| 🥱 | 1 | 0.575% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 174reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 March 2023 to 21 March 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Лапочкин спецом для Карпа объяснил, почему удаление Гайича — бесспорное! Читайте самые сочные Инсайды — от Карпа!
💩1
Глупости пишут конечно. Если фол - то 🟥 Либо тогда не фол, играем дальше.
👍4👎4🥱1
⚽️ Зенит - Факел ⚽️ Концовка матча. Суета в штрафной, падение, удар, рикошет, угловой. Именно так всё видел арбитр. Дальше это уже работа VAR, разобрать, как всё было на самом деле. 1️⃣ Проверяя атаку, VAR находит 100% нарушение правил - отставленная рука Эраковича. 2️⃣ Теперь, после обнаружения пенальти, его работа проверить всю атаку Факела от начала и до конца на предмет того, нет ли нарушения правил со стороны…
👍6❤2😁1
Гилерме играет в зелёной форме короткой. А под формой желтая поддёвка. Всегда удивляло, что на таком уровне не могут футболисты выходить в экипировке по правилам. И почему судьи на это не обращают внимание? @aloref
Карп пишет, что Иванов забыл нажать на кнопку, когда говорил про красную карточку Безбородову. Однако мои источники, которым невозможно в моем случае не доверять, говорят, что действительно не было связи. Источники видели видео переговоров, и тогда горела красная рамка. Безбородов не дождался обратной связи, не услышал по техническим причинам, что проверка продолжается. И во время разбега связь восстановилась крик…
👍1
Тотальный … произошёл в Грозном Безбородов назначил четвёртый пенальти за тайм. Формальный повод — оттянутая футболка — был. Но дальше — жесть. Без сообщения от Иванова «проверка завершена» свистка на пенальти быть не может. Безбородов держит руку у уха, даёт свисток, расставляя футболистов. Актнфеев отбивает, свисток, проверка, красная, пенальти перебивают. Это нарушение протокола ВАР. Вилков в своё время почти …
🤡37❤7👍3
Хороший урок правил и комментаторам и тренерам.
Отличная работа Фисенко: https://t.me/fnleagueofficial/7995 Только красная карточка в случае задержки возобновления игры, когда мяч забирается в руки, ноги, отбрасывается. @aloref
❤1
Бедные ассистенты. Если сейчас при определении офсайда надо смотреть и ловить выступающую ближе к воротам часть тела нападающего(годами отработанный навык), то сейчас надо ловить просвет между нападающим и защитником? Идиотизм.
👍22👎2
Не показалось! Майкл Оливер выходить судить с камерой на груди. Матч «Ромы». Чтобы было понятно, за что будет удалён Моуриньо) @aloref
👍5
Забудьте про ушедший в аут мяч перед голом Сити. Реал после этого вернул себе владение и гол пришел с обреза Камавинги. Это лишает ВАР возможности вмешаться
👍5🤔3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @YaSudja. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Кто для вас главный авторитет в судейских вопросах?
- ЭСК8%
- Эксперт Сергей Лапочкин2%
- Эксперт Алексей Николаев2%
- Эксперт Игорь Федотов35%
- Эксперт «Алё, рэф!»15%
- Эксперт Дмитрий Шнякин7%
- Я верю в то, что я видел сам – верю небесам, а не чужим голосам.30%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 March 2023 to 21 March 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@aloref · 34,3727 postsWe Are AC Milan | Милан
@acmilannews1899 · 27,9031 postШеф-поVAR
@chefVAR · 2,0131 postКазанский Код
@deniskazansky · 24,0431 postИнсайды от Карпа || Иван Карпов
@karpinside · 142,2261 postГородницкий | Футбол, деньги, медиа
@pgorodnitskiy · 50,3771 postСплошняк | Дмитрий Шнякин
@shhhnyakin · 38,0181 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@aloref · 34,3727 postsИнсайды от Карпа || Иван Карпов
@karpinside · 142,2262 postsШеф-поVAR
@chefVAR · 2,0131 postПрирода и животные фото
@fnleagueofficial · 8071 postВидосы/Аудюхи от Карпа
@karpvideo · 671 postМутко против
@offsider · 66,2541 postСплошняк | Дмитрий Шнякин
@shhhnyakin · 38,0181 postСериАл • Футбол Италии
@tg_calcio · 21,8071 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“#ЯСудья” (@YaSudja), 635 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/YaSudja.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.