Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 钰钰的小窝(红休版)

Channel

钰钰的小窝(红休版)

@YU_YU52O

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,061subscribers

-21 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003298784369
TypeChannel
Username@YU_YU52O
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 28 February 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/YU_YU52O

Growth

6,0436,1016,0726 August 2026 — 6,082 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,087 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,101 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,043 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,061 subscribers6,0616 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,034–6,110 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 20:046,061+18
13 Aug 2026, 02:236,043-58
10 Aug 2026, 02:016,101+14
7 Aug 2026, 00:026,087+5
6 Aug 2026, 20:176,082first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
45.2%
avg views ÷ 6,061 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,740
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.061%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held23 (30 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total49,280
Reactions total20
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

20 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1785.0%
👍15.00%
👻15.00%
😍15.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 16:44 UTC≈1,550 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @GZBG8866

【时间】:2026-08-04 【老师】:钰钰 【留名】:干中学 【评价】:👍 好评 【人照】:8 【颜值】:8 【身材】:9 【服务】:9 【态度】:9 【环境】:8 【综合】:8.5 【过程】:一直心心念念想找个bbw巨乳嫩妹,经过狼友的介绍,老师是自聊很好沟通。事前事后都有陪浴帮洗,并且会很仔细的帮擦,这点特别加分,既拥有嫩妹的年龄,又拥有御姐般的服务。先从口活开始,也是吞的很深没有齿感,还有舔蛋项目。既然是冲着巨乳来的那必须尝试胸推,大到可以把脸埋进去的天然E+奶,体验过后直接冲刺,在丰乳肥臀的夹击之下很快就123缴械了。 总结:服务比较好的bbw巨乳嫩妹,喜欢瘦的不推荐。

2

7 Aug 2026, 02:00 UTC≈2,140 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💐💐💐开奖了💐💐💐 越秀钰钰半价抽奖活动 开奖了! 本期总参与人数: 241 1- 普通公鸡 (消息数 32)(翻倍73.0) 获得:P半价 谨祝中奖用户大吉大利万事顺意

2

6 Aug 2026, 00:17 UTC≈2,480 viewsread 12 August 2026

红休啦,下次开课时间待定,想约课的宝宝都去约,悠悠和林汐老师,强烈推荐,现实闺蜜,不好来打我🥳🥳🥳🥳

5 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC≈2,760 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

抽奖广州凤吟修车茶馆(编号L178557066849)已成功开奖: 创建人:joker002[47776675] 已参与人数:142 中奖名单如下: 海海[1354443660](奖品为广州越秀-bbw钰钰老师的半价优惠券)

1

5 Aug 2026, 08:44 UTC≈2,820 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @gzfyjubg

打桩报告:https://t.me/+oxZLXLYHtnowNjA0 验证留名:Mr.cat 验证时间:8.5 修车水费:800 服务内容:洗吹做 颜值身材 :8 体验细节 :最近广州的天气真的是一直下雨,没有停过,一如即往的约好钰钰抵达课室,简单寒暄过后便冲洗干净开始正事,在钰钰的吹功下很快就硬了。戴套上马,正常体位,每次做这种事情全身都会发烫,把钰钰压在身下使劲肏。终于射出,今天状态不佳。不然就上两课了 是否事逼 :否 优点缺点 :要求不过分,都可以满足 推荐程度 :BBW款,值得一试 老师艺名 :钰钰 老师联系 :@YUYU_0112 温馨提醒 :报告仅供参考,不要太沉迷报告.自己体验一下 报告提交 @KTAFAKER

4 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTC≈2,760 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

受宠若惊🥹🥹我以为深圳香港的已经很远了,怎么还有南宁的🤩🤩

4 Aug 2026, 12:09 UTC≈2,530 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

1

4 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC≈2,700 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎰 越秀钰钰半价抽奖活动 📮 抽奖条件: 🎫 加入-钰钰的小窝 🎫 加入-(广州佛山)花海集 🅢 🎫 加入-广州佛山花海认证榜🅢 🎫 加入-广州佛山花海集报告榜(重生) 🎟️ 要求活动期间群内发言数 30 🍀 每10分中奖几率加1倍 ⤷在群中输入「喜+1」 🎁 奖品内容: P半价 × 1 💡 活动说明: 1. 自开奖后请在五日内兑奖 2. 炸号者中奖作废 3. 转赠需老师同意 4.不能有偿转让 5.兑奖必须写报告 6.兑奖联系: @YUYU_0112 📅 开奖日期:(UTC+8) 2026年08月07日 10时00分00秒

1

4 Aug 2026, 09:43 UTC≈2,580 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

【广州茶馆】:https://t.me/gzcg9 【时间】:2026-08-04 【老师】:钰钰 【账号】:@YUYU_0112 【留名】:Richard(卡颜卡扔版) 【颜值】:脸有点婴儿肥 很可爱 全妆上课 非常尊重嫖客 【身材】:顶级bbw F奶 大的离谱 【罩杯】:F杯 【服务】:🐍 69 课表上的都有 【态度】:不挑客 态度很好 【位置】:江湾阳光天地 【评分】:8.8 【过程】:前两天在群里问各位师兄,像我这种卡颜卡扔的应该找谁,一声一声 钰钰 呼唤出来,看完频道实在忍不住。马上想去放松一个月没发射的二弟。 第二天广州的天气实在是太臭了,阴雨连绵,但是出击人的心里无比欢喜。遥控上楼,江景房,迟到快半个小时,但是依旧笑脸相迎,约的pp,交完水费,马上开洗,事不宜迟! 钰钰宝宝脱下衣服,目瞪口呆,太大了,水不自觉地摸了上去,哇~软到离谱,🐻自然下垂,摸着扔子走向浴室,七嘴八🐍后马上转移战场。樱桃小嘴对我的咪咪猛攻,

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @YU_YU52O. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 464,041 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“钰钰的小窝(红休版)” (@YU_YU52O), 6,061 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/YU_YU52O.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.