Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for (广州探花)娱乐反馈报告

Channel

(广州探花)娱乐反馈报告

@GZBG8866

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

22,311subscribers

+4,079 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002762048918
TypeChannel
Username@GZBG8866
Description广州娱乐总榜单: https://t.me/GZYL8866 上榜合作留言: @wl0705ls_bot & @gzsbjqrbot 交流群: https://t.me/GZ08866
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/GZBG8866

Growth

17,28523,09220,188.56 August 2026 — 18,232 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,100 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,877 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,687 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,543 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,334 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,285 subscribers13 August 2026 — 23,092 subscribers15 August 2026 — 22,665 subscribers16 August 2026 — 22,311 subscribers22,3116 August 202616 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 10 days, net +4,079. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,414–23,963 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 14:4622,311-354
15 Aug 2026, 00:1422,665-427
13 Aug 2026, 13:5723,092+5,807
12 Aug 2026, 17:1317,285-49
11 Aug 2026, 15:2217,334-209
10 Aug 2026, 13:5117,543-144
9 Aug 2026, 15:1317,687-190
8 Aug 2026, 12:4617,877-223
7 Aug 2026, 15:3618,100-132
6 Aug 2026, 20:3318,232first reading

Engagement

108 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.84%
avg views ÷ 22,311 subscribers
Avg views / post
410
108 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.135%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
108
of 108 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 108 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held108 (5 August 202616 August 2026)
Views total44,257
Reactions total6
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 20:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
50
Videos
2
Links
914

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
466.7%
👍116.7%
🔥116.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 108 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 108 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Aug 2026, 15:26 UTC121 viewsread 16 August 2026

【时间】:2026-08-16 【老师】:佳佳 【留名】:匿名 【评价】:👍 好评 【人照】:7 【颜值】:7 【身材】:7 【服务】:8 【态度】:9 【环境】:9 【综合】:7.83 【过程】:服务就是正常的吹洗做,陪洗,擦干躺床,嘬咪咪,舔蛋,口,戴套女上起手,老师女上累了就躺下,我调查她,整个过程态度还可以,B 胸 摸着有点硬(出击次数比较少,不太懂分辨真假)约的 10 点,我因为塞车迟到了 几分钟,老师没催 这一点给好评,大致就这样

16 Aug 2026, 13:47 UTC319 viewsread 16 August 2026

【时间】:2026-08-15 【老师】:沁伊 【留名】:就爱出击 【评价】:👍 好评 【人照】:9 【颜值】:9 【身材】:8 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:9 【综合】:9.17 【过程】:歇了一天感觉无聊约了老师。进门就看到了一只非常哇塞的御姐,但是又非常的有亲和力,是我喜欢的类型。人照9成,皮肤又白又嫩,两条大长腿也是非常的直白。交了水费直接开服务 洗了个澡,老师细心的帮忙擦干,被拉到旁直接蹲下开口,口技非常的顶,花样很多,差点直接交代在嘴里了。胸正好一握的大小,一手掌控的感觉非常的好,还特别享受的样子。爱爱没什么好说的,依旧女上传教士后入三件套(不知道我啥时候能学点新花样),身体的相性非常好,一顿输出,水很多做起来特别爽快。 总结:少有的软硬件都在线的老师,给我的感觉非常好。

16 Aug 2026, 13:22 UTC122 viewsread 16 August 2026

【时间】:2026-08-16 【老师】:大波妹 【留名】:坟头 造型师 【评价】:👌 中评 【人照】:7 【颜值】:7 【身材】:8 【服务】:9 【态度】:8 【环境】:8 【综合】:7.83 【过程】:跟老师越好,地方好找,遥控上门,老师属于丰满类型的,是我的菜,唯一不足就是有点小肚子,交了水费一起洗澡,很耐心也很细致,因为我前几天膝盖有擦伤,老师也是很细心的躲过伤口帮我清洗,有一次性毛巾,洗完上床服务,老师口的很舒服,奶头很敏感,随便动两下就说要高潮了,女上厚乳和传教士都试了一遍,最后抓着大奶成功出水。总结,丰满类型,奶大敏感,服务也挺好,不会冷场,匈奴人可以冲的。

16 Aug 2026, 09:36 UTC81 viewsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Telegram必备的搜索引擎,极搜JISOU帮你精准找到,想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_6780442352

16 Aug 2026, 09:36 UTC130 viewsread 16 August 2026

【时间】:2026-08-16 【老师】:婉婷 【留名】:大熊 【评价】:👍 好评 【人照】:10 【颜值】:10 【身材】:10 【服务】:10 【态度】:9 【环境】:9 【综合】:9.67 【过程】:态度好,不过分的要求都会尽量满足, 爱爱,逼逼感觉很紧,老师也挺敏感,包裹感特强, 良家感,大长腿,馒头逼,喜欢这些标签的狼友可以去打卡!不催不机车,全程配合度高,会回锅!

16 Aug 2026, 08:46 UTC79 viewsread 16 August 2026

【时间】:2026-08-16 【老师】:宁桃 【留名】:匿名 【评价】:👍 好评 【人照】:8 【颜值】:8 【身材】:8 【服务】:8 【态度】:8 【环境】:8 【综合】:8 【过程】:各方面都很好,唯一就是太松了

16 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC262 viewsread 16 August 2026

【时间】:2026-08-16 【老师】:舒柔 【留名】:蜡笔没了 【评价】:👍 好评 【人照】:9 【颜值】:8 【身材】:10 【服务】:9 【态度】:9 【环境】:9 【综合】:9 【过程】:被中介骗惨了,只能找舒柔妹妹缓解一下心情。群里师兄介绍的,进来之后,老师身材是真棒,白白嫩嫩的,胸很大,而且摸起来是真的,任由我把玩。陪🐟洗的很仔细,🐍管够的,什么姿势都尝试了一下。传教士把腿直起来,视觉冲击很强,体验很不错。最终后入出货,白白的大屁股,很难顶得住。值得二返!

16 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC157 viewsread 16 August 2026

【时间】:2026-08-15 【老师】:若若 【留名】:马上就好 【评价】:👍 好评 【人照】:8 【颜值】:8 【身材】:8 【服务】:9 【态度】:9 【环境】:9 【综合】:8.5 【过程】:老师在的小区挺好找 直接进去按楼层就能上到 不用电梯卡 进门的话,老师热情的递水。老师是个萌妹子类型,瘦瘦小小,扎着双马尾 ,看起来很像未成年小女孩,但实际上已经成年了,06年的。整体还是挺满意的。就交了上课费,然后就去洗澡,洗澡的话,老师有帮忙洗,洗完澡就进房间进行服务,可以让老师挑选制服,我选了JK 加 黑白长筒袜,然后就进行服务,老师的下面超级的粉嫩,没有任何异味异味,舌吻之后忍不住的舔她下面了,然后戴上套进行正式工作,然后啪啪啪出水了。完事后老师帮洗,洗完穿上衣服,老师送到门口,然后跟老师道别撤退,回家睡觉

16 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC114 viewsread 16 August 2026

【时间】:2026-08-15 【老师】:萍萍 【留名】:匿名 【评价】:👍 好评 【人照】:8 【颜值】:7 【身材】:8 【服务】:8 【态度】:7 【环境】:8 【综合】:7.67 【过程】:有幸中的半价,正好赶上老师有事儿,等了几天没联系上老师,有事儿回来之后联系上了,立刻出击。到达楼下没有保安直接上电梯顺利进屋,屋子比较小,一房一厅。老师能看出跟照片是同一人。个子就比较高。可能老师刚回来。感觉不是特别热情。之后正常流程洗澡。没有水中箫。然后上床。比较特别的是漫游有一个先点的环节,还有声响,挺有意思。服务内容,漫游,胸推,洗,吹做。Ab面都有。口的时间不长。完全没感觉。之后就是小黄文儿了。总之喜欢此类型的可以去

16 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC371 viewsread 16 August 2026

【时间】:2026-08-15 【老师】:星禾 【留名】:nicaicai woshishui 【评价】:👍 好评 【人照】:9 【颜值】:9 【身材】:10 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:9 【综合】:9.5 【过程】:看到狼友群都推荐星禾老师,于是果断约夜课,周六出击。到了教室,本以为会和照片差距大,没想到和照片一模一样,脸看上去更下,身材一级棒星禾老师超敬业,我晚11点到她才刚吃午饭。经过上次的教训,开了最晒的时间段,约了一个相对较迟的时间。先和星禾老师聊了聊,先开始漱口,然后老师帮洗非常细心,冲湿身之后,按出沐浴露在手心揉搓几下,出泡泡之后再帮我清洗,全程自动,结束后帮忙擦干。到床上之后,先开始蛇,蛇到饱了,然后刺激着乳头,一直进攻到下方,老师含进去之后,我感受着口腔的温度和老师的服务,已经硬得不行了。接着戴套女上,我双手爱抚着她的胸部,然后老师俯下身来,肌肤紧贴。我双手在她的细腻嫩滑的背上上不断游走,随后把

16 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC379 viewsread 16 August 2026

【时间】:2026-08-15 【老师】:乐盈 【留名】:C razy 【评价】:👍 好评 【人照】:8 【颜值】:8 【身材】:9 【服务】:9 【态度】:9 【环境】:8 【综合】:8.5 【过程】:和老师约了pp,首先老师遥控回消息很快,没有罚站的情况,这一点十分好评。 到了教室还没来得及敲门,老师便已经打开招呼进来。老师人照相仿,态度亲和,皮肤白皙,于是开心交了水费。可惜一次性qq内衣用完了,老师也是主动说要网购一件,不过我怕麻烦便作罢。来到浴室洗澡。 老师相当爱干净,给小小弟上了两次沐浴露,随后作水中萧。 老师女上有力气,几下就把小弟摇得受不了,赶紧求饶换了姿势,也是123出水。 2p不知为何状态不佳,一直萎靡不振,老师也丝毫不催,便一同躺在床上刷着手机调整状态,休息久了小弟都不好意思了,2p也是圆满出水,与老师告辞。 乐盈老师兼具嫩妹的外表,御姐的服务,亲民的价格,非常值得师兄们一亲芳泽

15 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC200 viewsread 16 August 2026

【时间】:2026-08-15 【老师】:木子 【留名】:Van(V8动力版) 【评价】:👍 好评 【人照】:9 【颜值】:9 【身材】:9 【服务】:9 【态度】:9 【环境】:9 【综合】:9 【过程】:最近一段时间都忙成🐶,好多天没出击了。终于熬到周末,下午无所事事,天气也不错,不出击实在对不起自己啊!翻来覆去想了一圈,哈哈,最想的还是木子。事不宜迟,马上私信问空档,刚好她有空,立马飞车前往。 课室还是那个熟悉的课室,但木子感觉比以前更加明艳动人了,皮肤更好,气色也更亮。进门后她直接给了我一个深深的拥抱,软软热热的,老朋友的感觉一下子就回来了。我们坐下来抽了根烟,随便聊了几句近况,气氛特别自然舒服,完全没有生疏感。 不一会儿一起去洗澡,她洗得还是那么仔细,过程中会主动贴近,那对熟悉的大胸软软地蹭着,手感一如既往地好。洗完回房上床开课。 前戏她很温柔,吹得很认真,也含得很深。没多久就立马带套,我让她骑

Showing the 12 most recent of 108 posts we hold for @GZBG8866. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 57,323 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“(广州探花)娱乐反馈报告” (@GZBG8866), 22,311 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GZBG8866.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.