Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for DESPOT Supreme Court

Channel

DESPOT Supreme Court

@YQFcqpm7dZgzYzFh

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

46subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001523323114
TypeChannel
Username@YQFcqpm7dZgzYzFh
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/YQFcqpm7dZgzYzFh

Growth

464746.58 August 2026 — 47 subscribers10 August 2026 — 47 subscribers10 September 2026 — 46 subscribers8 August 202610 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 33 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 46–47 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 03:1846-1
10 Aug 2026, 13:4647no change
8 Aug 2026, 00:3147first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 18 January 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 03s
Average length
1m 03s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

26 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤830.8%
👍623.1%
💅311.5%
🙏311.5%
⚡27.69%
🔥27.69%
🎉13.85%
👏13.85%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 January 2024 to 13 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Apr 2026, 16:28 UTC44 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Louisiana v. Callais (No. 24-109), consolidated with Robinson v. Callais (No. 24-110), decided on April 29, 2026 The Court affirmed the district court’s ruling in a 6-3 decision. The Court stressed that §2 protects the opportunity for minority voters to elect preferred candidates on equal terms with others—it does not guarantee proportional representation or authorize race-based maps whenever a state could draw one…

7 Mar 2025, 12:00 UTC189 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

No, The Supreme Court Did Not Allow A District Judge To Order The Payment Of $2 Billion In Foreign Aid The procedural posture of the case is going to result in a Preliminary Injunction, which can then be appealed, before any payments to out that the Government Objects To. SHIPWRECKEDCREW MAR 06, 2025 https://shipwreckedcrew.substack.com/p/no-the-supreme-court-did-not-allow #Supreme_Court

❤1

1 Jul 2024, 16:59 UTC209 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @SeekingFactsOverFearpart2

https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/07/justices-rule-trump-has-some-immunity-from-prosecution/ "Trump then came to the Supreme Court, seeking review of the D.C. Circuit’s ruling. Two weeks later, the justices agreed to take up his case. They scheduled the argument for late April – putting the case on a faster track than it normally would have been, but a slower schedule than they had established for another case involvi…

1 Jul 2024, 15:59 UTC107 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

One problem dealt with at least .... the how to know if it's official or unofficial per SCOTUS...

1 Jul 2024, 15:59 UTC104 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @JwPZhF0G3gk5YjEx

SCOTUS Immunity Decision Trump v. United States https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

1 Jul 2024, 15:59 UTC95 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @realKarliBonneVideo

6-3 decision- a president is immune from criminal prosecution for official acts

28 Jun 2024, 21:04 UTC83 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @CharlieKirk

BREAKING: Supreme Court overturns Chevron ruling, blocks federal agencies' power to interpret 'ambiguous' statutes https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-supreme-court-overturns-chevron-ruling-blocks-federal-agencies-power-to-interpret-ambiguous-statutes?utm_campaign=64501

👏1

27 Jun 2024, 16:13 UTC66 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @insiderpaperPhoto

NEW: US Supreme Court strips SEC of key enforcement power READ: https://t.co/zdPPxAAwY4 Follow @InsiderPaper for more news

🔥2

1 Jun 2024, 15:59 UTC86 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

https://x.com/Prolotario1/status/1796761504638722293 & Two banking systems

👍2

1 Jun 2024, 15:59 UTC81 viewsread 10 August 2026
File

Direct PDF access post. No. 22–529. Argued February 27, 2024—Decided May 30, 2024 The United States maintains a dual system of banking. Banks with federal charters—called national banks—are subject primarily to federal oversight and regulation. Banks with state charters are subject to additional state oversight and regulation. As relevant here, the National Bank Act expressly grants national banks the power to admin…

15 Mar 2024, 20:40 UTC93 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @disclosetv

JUST IN - SCOTUS unanimously rules (9-0): public officials can be sued for blocking users and political expression on social media. Posts by public officials are considered part of their job, and blocking users and comments on official accounts violates the First Amendment. https://www.disclose.tv/id/ak32quoih6/ @disclosetv

👍4🎉1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @YQFcqpm7dZgzYzFh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DESPOT Supreme Court” (@YQFcqpm7dZgzYzFh), 46 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/YQFcqpm7dZgzYzFh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.