Channel
@YN_1888
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
959subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003034277519 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @YN_1888 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/YN_1888 |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @yuenan177/47665 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC | @YN_1888/4994 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @yuenan177/47685 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC | @YN_1888/4996 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @yuenan177/47695 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC | @YN_1888/4997 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @yuenan177/47715 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC | @YN_1888/4999 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @yuenan177/47746 Aug 2026, 08:34 UTC | @YN_1888/5002 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 10:04 UTC | 1.00 | 1.5 hours |
| @yuenan177/47776 Aug 2026, 09:41 UTC | @YN_1888/5005 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 10:04 UTC | 1.00 | 22 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @yuenan177 | 18 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @yuenan177 (18–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 12 of the 18 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 6 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @yuenan177. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:58 | 959 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:31 | 964 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (5 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 27 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 19:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
20岁女子自卖手机谎报被抢，骗父母钱买电脑遭起诉 8月5日，越南新仁富坊派出所通报一起荒唐报假警案件。一名20岁永隆省女子前往警局报案，谎称自己在街头遭摩托男子抢夺iPhone 14 Pro。警方随即调取现场监控、实地勘查核验，却全程未查到任何抢劫痕迹、可疑人员与案发证据。 面对证据，女子终于坦白真相。她早已自行将手机变卖，获利超千万越南盾，却刻意编造被抢谎言，意图骗取父母钱财购置新笔记本电脑。目前警方已依法对其提起诉讼，追责其谎报虚假信息、浪费公共警力资源的行为。
#越南快报：8月4日晚间，越南岘港市三春乡富溪村路段发生一起致命铁路交通事故，造成一名当地男子当场身亡。 当晚22时46分，一列HH16货运列车沿线路行驶至该路段时，司机发现一名46岁男性居民违规停留于铁轨路肩的限界区域内，随即采取鸣笛警示及紧急制动措施，但因距离过近未能避让，男子不幸被撞身亡。 事故发生后，列车班组第一时间向调度中心及所属车站上报情况，当地交通、公安等职能部门迅速抵达现场，开展事故勘察与处置工作。经现场处理，涉事列车于23时44分恢复正常通行。 目前，该起事故的具体原因仍在当地相关部门进一步调查核实中，后续将根据调查结果公布详细情况，以警示公众增强铁路沿线安全意识，避免类似悲剧再次发生。
越南义安交警暖心施救 成功救下桥面轻生女子 8月5日，义安省交通警察局通报一起暖心救援事件，当地交警巡逻队员及时出手，成功劝阻并救下一名欲跳桥轻生的女子，避免了悲剧发生。 当日下午2时30分，清章交警队警员在46号国道常态化巡逻时，发现一名女子坐在吉岸乡江河吊桥的护栏上，情绪崩溃、持续哭泣，疑似准备跳桥自尽。武英豪少校与邓伯福上尉立刻赶赴现场开展救援。 武英豪少校耐心安抚劝导女子，缓解其极端情绪，同时翻越护栏逐步靠近。趁女子注意力分散的瞬间，迅速将其牢牢拉住，联合其余队员将她安全转移至桥下安全区域。据悉，这名年近四十的女子存在抑郁情绪。事后交警已将她妥善交由家属接回照看。
未在越南犯案卻遭拘捕 台越司法合作機制是否存在？官方應公開說明 近日，多名遭台灣司法機關通緝的人士，在未涉越南境內犯罪的情況下，遭越南公安拘捕並限制對外聯繫，引發外界高度關注。 由於越南與台灣並無正式外交關係，本案也因此引發一連串值得社會關注的疑問。 當事人的程序權利是否獲得充分保障？ 相關主管機關是否願意向社會說明本案的法律依據及決策過程？ 本案不僅涉及個案處理，更牽涉跨境司法合作的透明度、公權力的行使，以及程序正義等重要公共議題。 社會期待相關主管機關正面回應外界疑問，以公開、透明的方式說明本案的法律依據與程序，讓事實接受社會檢驗。
司机用殡葬标识遮挡车牌被罚，最高罚 2600 万越盾 越南兴安省交警查获一辆 16 座车，司机用殡葬车辆标识故意遮挡原车牌，试图逃避监管。依据当地交规，涉事司机将面临 2000 万至 2600 万越南盾罚款，并处扣驾照 6 分，常规处罚约 2300 万越南盾。 当地交警提醒，遮挡车牌属违法行为，殡葬车辆仅享有路口优先通行权，无超速、闯红灯等特权。此前河内已有司机因车牌被泥浆遮挡未清理被罚同款金额。
潜逃九年整容换脸，越南一女地产商涉诈骗265亿被捕 8月4日，越南多乐省警方联合胡志明市警方，在胡志明市新美坊成功抓获特别危险的通缉犯阮氏柳（43岁）。 调查显示，阮氏柳在2015年至2017年7月担任多乐省一家房地产经纪公司董事期间，通过虚构地块、伪造土地使用权证及房屋资产证书等手段骗取客户信任，共诈骗68名受害者超过265亿越南盾。2017年8月，她因涉嫌诈骗和侵占财产罪被提起刑事诉讼，随后潜逃。同年9月，警方对其发布通缉令。 在长达近九年的逃亡期间，阮氏柳通过整容手术改变面部特征，并使用伪造身份证件隐瞒行踪。尽管她多次更换住址和身份，最终仍未能逃脱法网。目前，阮氏柳已被移交多乐省接受进一步调查。
越南Capel公司特大投资诈骗案 越南胡志明市人民法院即将开庭审理Capel公司特大投资诈骗和洗钱案。检方指控，这公司打着多元化企业的幌子，靠办大型投资说明会、承诺超高回报，骗了4837名投资者，非法募集约7020亿越盾，并侵吞超过4207亿越盾。 2021年10月，45岁的武德静受聘当Capel公司战略顾问，约定能拿融资总额15%的报酬。此前他还自己掏了7.8亿越盾帮公司启动。 按武德静设计的套路，公司每周开2到6场大型说明会，每场拉300多人，地点从总部到全国各酒店都有。武德静负责租场地、请主持人，吕国长和一帮高管则上台忽悠。 他们吹公司业务涵盖房地产、绿色能源、屋顶太阳能、旅游、运输、教育培训、技术转让等一大堆领域，还声称在多个国家有代表处，就为让人信。 接着诱导投资者签“合作投资协议”，以买公司股份的名义投钱，承诺日收益0.625%、周收益3.125%、月收益12.5%，或者两年后本金加收益一共300%的回报。…
越南邮局员工侵吞11亿判13年 越南芹苴市人民法院8月4日一审宣判，原朔庄市邮局会计员工黎明新（1997年出生）因诈骗侵占财产罪，被判有期徒刑13年。 检方指控，这家伙2022年12月进朔庄市邮局当业务员，负责推广服务、维护客户和收钱。2023年10月调去当会计后，还继续插手大客户邮件和费用对账。 2024年1月到7月，他因为投资亏了钱、债务缠身，就动起了侵吞公款的歪心思。利用职务便利，多次伪造客户要现金结算的信息，做假的货到付款（COD）支付凭证，还冒充客户或找人代签收款，顺便钻系统漏洞改账目和对账资料，把资金流向遮得严严实实。 另外他还撒谎说自己负责发养老金、优抚补助金和社会救助金，让同事把钱交给他去发，结果直接据为己有。 调查显示，黎明新通过这些手段一共吞了朔庄市邮局超过11亿越盾。这些钱既有客户货到付款的代收资金，也有专门用来发养老金、优抚对象补助金和社会救助金的专项款。 法院认为，被告利用职务便利长期搞诈骗…
胡志明市警方追逃多人落网投案 越南胡志明市公安机关最近一直在加大追捕在逃嫌疑人的力度，同时开展劝投工作，成功抓了好几个长期潜逃的家伙，还让多名嫌疑人主动投案自首，形成“追捕+劝投”双管齐下的模式。 今年7月以来，胡志明市警方先后在新山一国际机场和多个地方抓获多名网上通缉人员，包括从比利时返回越南后落网、涉嫌赌博的阮氏金花，以及涉嫌赌博和组织赌博的中国籍男子宋云生。另外还陆续抓住多名涉嫌毒品、故意伤害、非法跨境运输资金和诈骗等案件的在逃人员，并跟柬埔寨警方合作，把一名潜逃境外的通缉犯押回了越南。 除了加强追捕，警方还通过基层警力走访家属、宣传法律政策，鼓励在逃人员主动投案。其中有一名因涉嫌诈骗从1996年就跑了、逃亡长达30年的女子，在警方和家属持续劝导下，今年5月主动到公安机关投案；还有一名涉嫌偷摩托车的男子，在警方耐心做思想工作后，也带着涉案车辆主动自首。 在涉案金额超过6120亿越盾的“度假产权”诈骗案中，胡志明市经…
越南两女假结婚骗中国男近5亿 太原省公安厅8月4日通报，破了起假结婚诈骗案。两名女子联手坑了一名中国男子近5亿越盾彩礼，现在已经被刑拘了。 1998年出生的黄氏河庄以前在中国待过，清楚不少中国男的想娶越南媳妇，还愿意砸高额彩礼。她就动了歪心思，拉上2007年出生的堂妹黄琴英一起干这票。 其实黄琴英早就跟一个中国男的登记结婚了，离婚手续都没办。两人伪造证明，装成黄琴英单身，把1977年出生的林惠进给忽悠瘸了，让他以为能合法结婚。 林惠进前后掏了4.9597亿越盾（差不多人民币14万），结果钱到手后两人直接私分花掉。 太原省警方已经以诈骗侵占财产罪对两人立案，采取了刑事措施，案子还在继续查。 警方提醒，跨国结婚走正规渠道，别傻乎乎信别人的承诺或者乱掏高额彩礼，不然很容易被坑得裤衩都不剩。
#越南资讯 经济起飞！胡志明市外资企业5年增长41% 根据2026年胡志明市经济普查数据，截至2025年12月31日，胡志明市共有超过1.4万家外商直接投资企业（FDI企业），比2020年增长41%，共业数量和总营收的主体地位，但外资企业在增长速度、单雇用超过160万名员工，占全市就业人口的四分之一以上。 数据显示，2020年至2025年，胡志明市外资企业数量平均每年增长7.1%，在国有企业、民营企业和外资企业三类企业中增速最快。 胡志明市统计部门认为，外资企业持续增加，一方面说明当地投资环境对外国投资者仍有吸引力，另一方面也反映出部分跨国企业正在调整供应链，并扩大在越南的生产和经营规模。 截至2025年底，胡志明市共有约96.45万个正在运营的经济单位，包括企业、公共服务机构、社会组织、非政府组织及宗教机构等，总就业人数约为582万人。 外资企业虽然只占全市经营单位总数的约1.5%，却雇用了超过四分之一的劳动人口，说…
#越南资讯：岘港市凌晨突击清查200间公寓，发现中国籍、印度籍人员涉DU！ 据越媒8月3日报道：近日，岘港市警方开展针对外国人居住管理和社会治安秩序的专项检查行动，对当地两栋高端公寓楼进行突击检查，共检查200余套公寓、350余名外国人，并发现2名人员DU品检测呈阳性。 据岘港市公安部门消息：8月1日凌晨3时，岘港市海洲坊公安机关组织大规模行动，对辖区内的 Sam Towers公寓楼和Blooming Towers公寓楼 开展居住登记检查，同时对部分外国居住人员进行毒品快速检测。 此次行动共调动约200名公安人员，并联合基层治安力量，对外国人在当地的居住情况、登记信息以及遵守越南相关法律规定情况进行全面检查。 检查两栋高端公寓，350余名外国人接受排查 在 Sam Towers公寓楼，警方共检查118套房屋，涉及203名正在居住的外国人，并对其中72人进行快速DU品检测。 检查结果显示：一名中国籍男性的DU品检测呈阳…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @YN_1888. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 319,678 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 27 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“越南新闻 🪻” (@YN_1888), 959 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/YN_1888.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.