Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

الشاعر ابو حسين الراعي

@YEMEN_71

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

621subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001336968283
TypeChannel
Username@YEMEN_71
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/YEMEN_71

Growth

621622621.56 Aug 2026, 16:39 — 622 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 17:33 — 622 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 08:50 — 621 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 16:397 Aug 2026, 08:50
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 621–622 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 08:50621-1
6 Aug 2026, 17:33622no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:39622first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
224.8%
avg views ÷ 621 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,400
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held20 (1 July 20262 August 2026)
Views total19,542
Reactions total197
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 17:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

298 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥13043.6%
8428.2%
👍3712.4%
🫡248.05%
💯144.70%
👏51.68%
😁41.34%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 298reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @YEMEN_71. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 July 2026 to 2 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 21:56 UTC≈2,380 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

ما قدر يهجــــم ولا اقدر يدافع البداية والنهـــــــــــــاية حزينة كملوه انصـــــــــــار ربي فجايع كل ليلة يدخلــــــــــوا لا مدينة يا ولد سلمــــــــــــان ركز وتابع اليمـــــــن ماهوش لقمة سهينة انت جاوع واليمـــن غير جاوع غير بطنك من حـــــلاله سمينة انت لبريطانيـــــــــا كلب طايع وانت ناقة للمــــــــريك اللعينة وانت لاسرائيـل جاموس راكع يحلبــــــــونك كل ساعة قنينة واليمن شاجع ومليـــون شاجع لا تحط الي

🔥11👍2🫡1

31 Jul 2026, 21:33 UTC198 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026

المعـــــــــركة تمشي على ما نشتي وقدرة الله عكــــس م انتوا تشتوا انتوا صنعتـوا للمـــــــراقص مفتي واحنا صنعنــــــا للوغى قاصف تو تسليمنــــــــا وايماننــــــا البالستي اقوى مـن السوفيتيــــــــة والنيتو لو تحشدون العــــــــالم الطاغوتي ماباتمــــــــــــــــروا عندنا وتفوتوا الحرب حربي والمعـــــــــارك بنتي والحــق حقي ليــــس "حق الفيتو" ب اركــــــــز براميلي وامدد وقتي وآعيش وسط البحر وانتوا موتوا #ال

🔥10🫡5👏3👍2

27 Jul 2026, 18:35 UTC≈2,690 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

زامل حماسي (رفع الحصار)🔥 كلمات الشاعر | #أبو_حسين_الراعي اداء المنشدين | #ابو_اسلام_الجوف و #ابو_عابد_الطاووس

🔥17

27 Jul 2026, 18:34 UTC305 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#زامل (رفع الحصار) كلمات الشاعر | #أبو_حسين_الراعي اداء المنشدين | #ابو_اسلام_الجوف و #ابو_عابد_الطاووس هل حان رفع الحصار الجار يا ذو الفقار ؟ إجتاح الاوكـــار واقصف منشئآت الأمير وجِفَّ الآبـــــــار وانسف قاعدات المطار النـــار شبّت وحنّا قد صبــــــــرنا الكثير

11👍1

25 Jul 2026, 19:22 UTC≈3,010 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

#زامل (قل للسعودي يقع رجال) اداء المنشد | #جلال_سفيان كلمات الشاعر | #ابو_حسين_الراعي الحان المنشد | #عيسى_الليث

16🔥1

25 Jul 2026, 19:21 UTC209 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Zawamil_Alkasir

جديد #زامل (( قل للسعودي يقع رجال )) للمشاهدة على اليوتيوب https://youtu.be/QM4ZF7xzhW8?si=X-OGpq0x__LyzPo2 اداء المنشد | #جلال_سفيان كلمات الشاعر | #ابو_حسين_الراعي الحان المنشد الحربي | #عيسى_الليث تسجيل #محمد العزي مكس وتوزيع #بدرالهتار ؛ــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ؛ ياشعب ابو جبريل يا نور الليـــــــــالي الحالكة يامحزمي في الليــــــلة الظلمى ويادرع الوطن يا من قهرت اقوى القوى المستكب

11🔥1

25 Jul 2026, 18:38 UTC262 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

قل للسعـــــــودي يا يقع رجـــــــــال والا بلّكه" لا حمّـــــــــل الله نفسٍ الا وسعهـــــا يابو يمن اليــــوم هذا يا يمنــــــا يوم حسم المعـــــركة ويوم دعس ابناء سعود المستبـــــــدِّين الهَين رصوا الصفـــــوف الحيدرية وابدأوا بالتكتكة والعاصمة صنعــــاء تحيي كل نشمي في عدن ماباتضـــــــــــــل المملكـة بحقوقنـــا متمسكـة واحنا نمكـــــــــن والديها إتفاقـــــــات و هُدَن مابايعيشوا في ســلام وفي نعيــــــم و

👍11

25 Jul 2026, 18:07 UTC259 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

ترقبوا بعد قليل #زامل (قل للسعودي يقع رجال) اداء المنشد | #جلال_سفيان كلمات الشاعر | #ابو_حسين_الراعي الحان المنشد #عيسى_الليث

8💯2🫡1

22 Jul 2026, 21:47 UTC≈2,850 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

المعنـــويات تنــــــــطح ناطحـــات السحاب وتســـــابق الريح وتداوي الفـــــؤاد الجريح وكل تصــــــــــريح للنــــــــاطق بذاته عذاب وكل تلميــــــــح وآل سعــــــــود منّه تصيح ( والمعـــــركة بين آل البيت واهل الكتاب ) والناس مؤمن صريح ، والا منافق صريح !! #الشاعر_ابو_حسين_الراعي ؛ https://t.me/YEMEN_71

🔥9🫡3👍2

22 Jul 2026, 21:27 UTC≈2,010 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026

قلنا لكم بحر اليمـــــــن خط احمر وانتوا تجاهلتوا الخطوط الحمراء

🔥10👍1🫡1

20 Jul 2026, 22:26 UTC403 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026

ابو جبــــــريل ما يمزح ولا شي وتحذيره لكــــــــم ماهو بجاحة فيارجّعتــــــــــــم الليلة معاشي ويابهذلتكـــــــــم في كل ساحة قرار الحظر ماشي والف ماشي وممنوع السبـــــــاحة والملاحة مواشي والله ان انتــوا مواشي ومشتاقيــــــــــــن جداً للذباحة نصحناكـــــم وحاولنا التحاشي وما زاد التحـــــاشي الا وقاحة بهـايم ما يمشيهـــــــــا التماشي تشوف الضرب بالعصيان راحة على انفسكـم حكمتم بالتلاشي وفضلتم نهايـــــــــ

🔥11🫡1

20 Jul 2026, 17:41 UTC≈2,170 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

والليل يا قايد الأنصـــــــــــار حن ارعد لا ما يصلــــــــوا على المختار واحفاده

🔥92🫡2👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @YEMEN_71. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 10,829 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“الشاعر ابو حسين الراعي” (@YEMEN_71), 621 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/YEMEN_71.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.