Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 小丽个人频道

Channel

小丽个人频道

@Xy8lil

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

375subscribers

+371 since we began measuring on 8 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004312637879
TypeChannel
Username@Xy8lil
Created7 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 September 2026
Last confirmed live3 November 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 3 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Xy8lil

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

4375189.58 September 2026 — 4 subscribers10 September 2026 — 32 subscribers12 September 2026 — 32 subscribers26 September 2026 — 189 subscribers7 October 2026 — 257 subscribers15 October 2026 — 325 subscribers21 October 2026 — 355 subscribers28 October 2026 — 375 subscribers8 September 202628 October 2026
8 measurements spanning 50 days, net +371. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Oct 2026, 09:47375+20
21 Oct 2026, 22:11355+30
15 Oct 2026, 02:07325+68
7 Oct 2026, 17:01257+68
26 Sept 2026, 06:01189+157
12 Sept 2026, 11:2332no change
10 Sept 2026, 18:3532+28
8 Sept 2026, 07:174first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤150.0%
👍150.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 11 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Sept 2026, 08:10 UTC281 views1 reactionsread 12 September 2026
Forwarded from @HZdianping

杭州开课资讯分享: 【位置艺名】:小丽 【联系方式】:@xyejung 【喝茶留名】: 军哥 【喝茶时间】:9.9 【喝茶价格】:800pp 【芳龄身高】:160 【罩杯手感】:B不错 【服务内容】:基本写的都有,服务认真 【优点缺点】:老师态度好,热情,性价比高 【体验细节】:老师按照遥控上楼,进门就感到舒服,空调打的很足。老师真人比照片上更有韵味,气质温柔,说话也很客气。简单聊了几句,便交了水费准备上课。老师主动陪浴,帮忙调好水温,洗得很仔细。出来后我趴在床上,老师从背面开始服务,指尖轻轻滑过背部。舌尖柔软湿润,从耳后一路往下,特别是照顾到腰部和大腿内侧,酥酥麻麻的节奏掌握得恰到好处。转到正面后,老师重点进攻胸前两点,不急不缓,时而轻吻时而深舔。之后慢慢往下,直到含住小兄弟。口技确实不错,温热包裹,毫无齿感,深浅交替还会抬头看我反应,眼神撩人。我也趁机探索老师的身下,干净无味,细腻饱满,互动十分投入。戴套进入时明显感…

👍1

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @Xy8lil. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“小丽个人频道” (@Xy8lil), 375 subscribers as measured 28 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Xy8lil.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.