18 Sept 2026, 03:46 UTC34 viewsread 18 September 2026
Video
开课了，超级服务好评有过来体验的吗？
Channel
小兮兮的频道
@Xxixi6688
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
51subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 18 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004347237024 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Xxixi6688 |
| Description | 双向机器人: @AAxixi_bot |
| Created | 13 September 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 18 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Xxixi6688 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 05:22 | 51 | no change |
| 18 Sept 2026, 04:47 | 51 | first reading |
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 13 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 208.6%
- avg views ÷ 51 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 106
- 5 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 7
- of 7 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (13 September 2026 – 18 September 2026) |
| Views total | 532 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Sept 2026, 05:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 1
- Videos
- 2
- Links
- 2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 8s
- Average length
- 4s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
18 Sept 2026, 03:44 UTC34 viewsread 18 September 2026
杭州嫩妹馆报告：https://telegram.me/hznmg23 【推荐程度】：#好评 【优势】全套服务 95+98的结合 服务很认真 【不足】感觉熬夜的厉害 比较憔悴 【出击时间】：9月18日 【老师花名】：小兮兮#@xxixi98 【出击留名】： 风 【开课位置】：东站附近 【修车水费】： 工兵 【高端服务】：有的打✅ ① 舌吻 ✅ ② 69舔逼 ✅ ③ 情绪价值 ✅ ④ 毒龙 ✅ 【人照评价】：美颜了 人照八成有的 本人要憔悴一点 【身材评价】：身高目测165左右，腿挺长的 【胸部评价】：胸部ab+挺软和 【鲍鱼评价】： 鲍鱼蝴蝶 无异味 【服务评价】： 全程服务认证，，频繁更换姿势老师也配合 桩基也不会说啥 【态度评价】：过程无机车，无催、赶， 【环境评价】：新小区，隐蔽性高，装修好，环境好 【过程描述】： #流程细节：(大于100字) 杭州新来的服务系老师 心动了 然…
17 Sept 2026, 13:47 UTC127 viewsread 18 September 2026
Forwarded from @hzjjh_report
杭州基金会：https://telegram.me/Foundation_Of_HangZhou 评分标准：9.5 【出击时间】：9月17日 【老师花名】：#兮兮 @xxixi98 【出击留名】：小吧 【开课位置】：上城 【修车水费】：工兵P 【人照评分】：9分 【颜值评分】：9分 【身材评分】：9分 【服务评分】：10分 【态度评分】：10分 【环境评分】：9分 【综合评分】：9.5分 【过程描述】： #环境卫生： 交通出入方便，房间整洁 有一次性浴巾，有漱口水一次性牙刷 #老师优缺点： 开课准时，排课宽松，课时都做完了 服务到位，无少做，过程无机车，做爱反馈真实 #硬件软件： 人照相似程度9，像木下凜凜子，颜值御姐、气质很好 身高170左右，无纹身，皮肤手感软 #流程细节： 看到有颜值御姐上榜，马上报了名去了，下面重点说一下吧。 1，妹妹自聊的，标准居民小区开课，没门禁，也不是日租，安全性感觉不错。 2，很像木下…
17 Sept 2026, 11:50 UTCviews —
小兮兮的频道 pinned a photo
17 Sept 2026, 11:50 UTC158 viewsread 18 September 2026
Photo
请仔细查看！谢谢！
17 Sept 2026, 09:00 UTC179 viewsread 18 September 2026
Video
Video, posted without a caption
13 Sept 2026, 14:28 UTCviews —
Channel created
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @Xxixi6688. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“小兮兮的频道” (@Xxixi6688), 51 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Xxixi6688.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.