These aren’t safeguards; they’re steps toward total control.
custom 52426778272994503405

Channel
@XruccardoSvigni
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
123subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002231308127 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @XruccardoSvigni |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/XruccardoSvigni |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:54 | 123 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 122 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:11 | 122 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
256 reactions across 20 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5242677827299450340 | 139 | 54.3% | |
| 👍 | 30 | 11.7% | |
| 🎄 | 20 | 7.81% | |
| 🤣 | 20 | 7.81% | |
| 🤔 | 11 | 4.30% | |
| 👀 | 9 | 3.52% | |
| 🕊 | 7 | 2.73% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 1.95% | |
| 🦄 | 5 | 1.95% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 1.56% | |
| 🗿 | 2 | 0.781% | |
| 🤷♂ | 2 | 0.781% | |
| 🥴 | 2 | 0.781% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 256reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 October 2024 to 4 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @XruccardoSvigni. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 October 2024 to 4 February 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
These aren’t safeguards; they’re steps toward total control.
custom 52426778272994503405
Что произошло ночью? Я проснулся, а у меня почти весь портфель зелёный.
custom 52426778272994503409🎄2🦄2
Подумалось. Мало того, что обучение DeepSeek обошлось в сущие копейки, так ещё и создавший её китайский хедж-фонд, имеющий в управлении миллиарды долларов, скорее всего окупил затраты на разработку в первый же день, используя модельку по прямому назначению (торговля акциями). В это же время OpenAI теряет деньги, продавая доступ к своей модельке за 200 долларов в месяц. Китайцы же, видимо, смогут себе позволить поддер…
custom 52426778272994503406👍4🎄2
Babe wake up new roadmap just dropped
custom 52426778272994503405🎄3🦄3
Почему Трамп запустил свой мем не на Стонфи? Потому что там включена защита от пэмпа и трэмпа
custom 52426778272994503406🤣5🎄4😱2
Будьте на 2 шага впереди!
custom 52426778272994503409👍4🎄2
Вот сейчас дегены повыводили ликву из своих Бинансов, Эфириумов, Тонов и других свинарников, и всё понесли Трампу! И заработали сотни миллионов долларов! Вы наверное сами второй день читаете эти истории успеха, как автор вашего любимого телеграм канала проснулся среди ночи случайно и вложил на удачу десять тысяч долларов в мемкоин. А теперь подумайте, куда они все эти прибыли понесут? Выведут в фиат, или в Биткоин? …
custom 52426778272994503407👍5😱2🎄1🤣1
Нравятся активности в духе нового года, где не только проекты дарят подарки пользователям, но и наоборот. Например, подарил несколько болтов болтовому фаундейшену (активность у Жволт). А ещё под ёлочку Нику из Дедаста подложил взрывчатки С4 (полмиллиона в тротилловом эквиваленте). Тоже ради новогоднего тепла. 🐷 А какие ещё сейчас на тоне идут новогодние активности?
custom 524267782729945034010🎄3👍3
Я бы поставил реакцию, но Макс мою любимую свинью 🐷, которую я на каждый пост ставил, убрал из опций. Вот это самая большая потеря в экосистеме за год.
custom 524267782729945034018🗿2
Интересно, вроде в толке есть толк? Кажется, первое упоминание его с презентации на Гейтвее.
custom 52426778272994503404👍2🤔2
А как думаете, закончится когда-нибудь схема покупки нфт чего-то там, когда вы просто засылаете кому-то деньги через тг бота за нфт, а кнопки минта нету, и не понятно, зачем это всё?
custom 52426778272994503405👍2🕊2
В комментах под постом с адресом контракта пишут "свиньи". Значит что-то со свиньями связанное есть, надо будет разобраться.
custom 52426778272994503407👀2🤔2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @XruccardoSvigni. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Хрюккардо Свиньи” (@XruccardoSvigni), 123 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/XruccardoSvigni.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.