Channel
@Xiongfei1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
41subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 28 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004326775936 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Xiongfei1 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 4 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 28 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Xiongfei1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:39 | 41 | +2 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 11:15 | 39 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 40 | no change |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:01 | 40 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (4 August 2026 – 25 August 2026) |
| Views total | 104 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 19:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
每一次客诉，都是成长的机会。 消费透明，不是说说而已。 ————————————— 今天凌晨两点多，水友问我：汉阳哪里好玩？ 我刚从公司坐车回家，被这句话吓一跳。 现在的汉阳，比23年海天事件后还要干净。 果断给他介绍了当下的风向，了解了需求。 第一通电话，打给公司（卓刀泉广场）——只剩10个妹子，放弃。 第二通，打给新佳丽——关门。 最后问到皇宫，妹子还很多。 就决定是你了——比卡丘 🎯 ————————————— 和水友通电话，发现他正在王家湾吃饭。 巧了，我家也在王家湾。 直接修改滴滴目的地，和他汇合。 （周四喝多了，小车车违停被叔叔拖走，周一才能取😂） 碰面后确认场地，发了收费明细，叫了两辆滴滴出发。 本来计划带琳琳回家睡觉的，水友来了，琳琳好懂事，陪我一起去陪客户了。 爱了爱了，加分 ❤️ ————————————— 凌晨三点，皇宫妹子还是很多的，选了三批。 感谢琳琳陪我，就给她也点了一个小妹陪着玩。 几个兄弟…
今天凌晨三点，公司临时停电 ⚡ 没让水友玩尽兴，是我的问题。 果断带上妹子和水友，转场海底捞 🍲 ——阿辉买单 玩要玩得开心，吃也要吃得尽兴。 答应的事，就得办到底。
---💋基础信息💋--- 时间：2026-08-25 老师：阿辉KTV 飞机：@Xiong9317 留名：Asaiyume ---❤️综合评分❤️--- 颜值：9 态度：10 环境：9 综合：9.33 ---👅细节描述👅--- 人照： 身材： 服务： 描述：一直没玩过mmc，正好周一有活动，搞了两张优惠券，准备跟着辉哥去见识见识。辉哥服务确实一级棒，首先价格上面没有任何套路，就是一口价，没有什么弯弯绕绕。就是今天不凑巧，空调坏了，有点热。辉哥也一直在积极寻找解决方案，并且给我们弄来了两箱冰块进行物理降温，还给我们免费加了半个钟，服务态度这一块。 然后就是选妹子，一共来了两波人，应该得有四五十个，各种类型的都有。因为我是第一次玩mmc，有些放不开，不知道怎么把握尺度，不敢太主动，第一个妹子没选好，玩了两个小时都没玩出什么东西，但是我又不太好意思换人。辉哥在旁边了解情况后，立马给我换了一个主动的，特别给力，一来就躺我怀里，主动亲我，…
---💋基础信息💋--- 时间：2026-08-25 老师：阿辉KTV 飞机：@Xiong9317 留名：08天才堂吉柯德（上岸版） ---❤️综合评分❤️--- 颜值：9 态度：10 环境：9 综合：9.33 ---👅细节描述👅--- 人照： 身材：9 服务：180的尺度该有都有 描述： 运气特别好连中辉哥两个优惠卷，就决定把去mmc的计划提前。 辉哥服务确实一级棒，首先价格上面没有任何套路，就是一口价，没有那没多弯弯绕绕的。辉哥带的场子也很nice，妹子多且年轻漂亮，一进来就给我看花了眼。再就是服务，辉哥会主动带游戏，玩的开，而且会教学兄弟们开始怎么选合适的妹子，主要怎么玩，怎么玩才尽兴（小白友好）。就算遇上突发状况，他也能处理得妥当周全。这次我去的时候，场子的空调一开始出了故障没修好，他二话不说就主动给我们每个人多补了半小时时长，态度实在没话说。 下面是我个人的体验（小白体验）。第一次玩mmc，开始有些放不开。但点的妹子挺…
📋 客户投诉与整改方案 没有100%的满意服务 每一次客诉，都是一次进步的机会 ————————————— 📌 投诉事件：8月12日 定制拖鞋局 ————————————— 一、事件简介 客户A与客户B预定凌晨1点拖鞋局，由驻场小X接待。 选人环节，客户A钟意小妹E，但因E生理期，小X推荐了F（理由是方便、更放得开）。客户最终听从建议点了F和E，并邀请小X带节奏。 然而过程中，因小X与F存在暧昧关系，小X避嫌未进场带节奏，全程由客户自行推进，氛围冷清。更严重的是，最后环节F同样出现生理期问题，导致整场体验尴尬。 ————————————— 二、处理方案 ✅ 本次消费除小妹费和场地费外，其余费用全免 ✅ 成本由小X和我（阿辉）共同承担 ————————————— 三、改进措施 1️⃣ 演员上班前必须确认生理期状态，确保“方便”再上钟 2️⃣ 针对新手或不主动客户，提前询问是否需要带玩服务（需增加一名小妹费用，提前告知客…
今天凌晨三点，公司临时停电 ⚡ 没让水友玩尽兴，是我的问题。 果断带上妹子和水友，转场海底捞 🍲 ——阿辉买单 玩要玩得开心，吃也要吃得尽兴。 答应的事，就得办到底。
客户接待反馈 pinned «给我辉总写个迟来的评价，首先要说的就是人照一致三点粉嫩，其次从安排的前中后三个角度评价下： 前期辉总的报价是一口价，非常清晰，服务内容介绍的也很明确，此外无多一句废话，直接好感拉满。行前实时播报场内信息，发了出发消息之后一分钟车就到了。 中期：与辉总成功面基，亲切自然，会唠嗑。我们到达的时候正巧高峰，辉总说兄弟们先打两把台球，马上就好，言罢一盒荷花就塞手里了。两场球后顺利进场，提前沟通了喜好，我们仨兄弟第一轮海选就全部锁定到位。 后期：原定玩三小时，最后嗨玩六个半小时，过程中辉总也会过来敬酒互动，确保兄弟…»
阿辉服务太好了，全程车接车送，按需求按预算给每一位客户定制化需求，游玩过程中会带动气氛会玩游戏，场面不会尴尬，全程像朋友一样相处，✅✅
给我辉总写个迟来的评价，首先要说的就是人照一致三点粉嫩，其次从安排的前中后三个角度评价下： 前期辉总的报价是一口价，非常清晰，服务内容介绍的也很明确，此外无多一句废话，直接好感拉满。行前实时播报场内信息，发了出发消息之后一分钟车就到了。 中期：与辉总成功面基，亲切自然，会唠嗑。我们到达的时候正巧高峰，辉总说兄弟们先打两把台球，马上就好，言罢一盒荷花就塞手里了。两场球后顺利进场，提前沟通了喜好，我们仨兄弟第一轮海选就全部锁定到位。 后期：原定玩三小时，最后嗨玩六个半小时，过程中辉总也会过来敬酒互动，确保兄弟们的手都抓在正确的位置上。离场买单，辉哥拿过账单开始打钩，这个算我的，这个算我的，这个也算我的，咔咔一顿免。妹子挽手送至电梯，辉哥一路送到上车。 周到，放心，舒服。
❤1
隔了一年半没玩mmc了，主要是武汉现在市场不咋地，上周刚好辉哥活动就跟着去玩了一次。体验还是可以的。辉哥全程带节奏，基本都是大学生妹子。质量相对以前肯定会差点，但总体来说还是可以，看上了两个妹子。辉哥也会全程问你感受，玩腻味了辉哥也会带你去换妹子，唯一的遗憾就是队友都不咋喝酒。
头一次来武汉的MMC场子，辉哥带队，整体服务颜值性价比都是相当高的，辉哥很专业，玩游戏安排的妹子都是相当不错，这次去的这个场子整体来说颜值都相当不错，大学生为主，妹子玩游戏啥的都玩的很开，基本不会冷场，下次来非常建议来早点，进门看了很多顶美的妹妹都先被选走了，下次再来一定要再早点。总体来说性价比非常不错，妹妹情绪价值给的也挺足的，我们几个都不咋能喝酒，下回多喝点上头了玩的应该更嗨！ 强烈推荐，辉哥相当靠谱。
生活是多样的 服务也该如此 拥有一双发现美的眼睛 看见不同，方能妥善相待
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @Xiongfei1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“客户接待反馈” (@Xiongfei1), 41 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Xiongfei1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.