🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰 🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸 🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰 🤩🤩- Да, ты в очередной раз прав... Я просто хочу думать, что они хорошие... Просто хочу и переубеждаю себя в этом. Я устала..

Channel
Կρʙ.-𐌗ᥱ᧘ᥱн͟͟🦢
@XeLeN_BaRMiK
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
11subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003584974748 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @XeLeN_BaRMiK |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/XeLeN_BaRMiK |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:45 | 11 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:32 | 11 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 62.7%
- avg views ÷ 11 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 6.9
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 14.3%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (8 August 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 138 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 09:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 2
- Links
- 5
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👾 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰 🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸 🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰 🤩🤩- Но мы ведь сможем из найти! Мы быстро из найдем! Просто нужно слегка постараться... Я вспомнила. Те люди говорили, что мы сможем их отыскать и они нам помогут. Может.. Все таки они хорошие.. Последние капли надежды на их доброту проскользнули в слух, но не зря.
🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰 🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸 🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰 🤩🤩- Я тоже не знаю. Нужно мне потом спросить это у Лины, или Федора даже. Может они знают это
🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰 🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸 🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰 🤩🤩- Возможно и у меня такие ощущения, человеческие, но я не знаю. Я говорю как есть, как я чувствую... У людей ведь есть душа, но она не привязана к чему либо. Но если и говорить о червонной карте, то скажу, что я чувствалаа ее недавно будто? Ну или же это было несколько часов назад, не знаю точно какой период произошёл. Больше не было ничего
🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰 🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸 🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰 🤩🤩- Да не к кому я не собралась. Просто... Ладно. Я просто чутка устала от всего этого... Извини. Я тут сидела и отдыхала от всех мыслей. Я не знаю почему, но, моя душа... Она будто не выдерживает от всего этого... Такого раньше не было.. Руки сложились в замок и собрались на груди.
🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰 🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸 🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰 🤩🤩- Ну нельзя же так грубо относиться к их национальности! Хоть они может и недоброжелательный к нам, но все равно нельзя так обращаться с другими. И в квартире... Я появилась на улице и целый день бродила по Нью-Йорку. Хорошо, что у нас есть жилья, возможно и временное. Ладно... Только меня наверно искать будут, что я не пришла к ним
🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰 🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸 🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰 🤩🤩- Я не знаю, Пик... Мне трудно поверить, что все это происходит именно с нами... Я не понимаю почему и как мы это себе заслужили в жизни. Я же еще чуть не познакомилась с теми героями которые спасли мир как говорил тот мальчик... Рука потеряла глаза, убирая слезинки с щек. 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ➖➖➖➖🌟🌟🌟➖➖➖➖ 🤩🤩- А где ты нашел жилье? Ты кого-то тоже смог отыскать? Кого? Господи, чт
🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰 🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸 🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰 🤩🤩- ... Ну да... Ты прав... Девушка чутка сжалась, не от давления пикового короля, а от ломкости и хрупкости души. 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ➖➖➖➖🌟🌟🌟➖➖➖➖ 🤩🤩- Но куда нам податься?... Пик... Мне страшно... А что будет дальше? С нами... С бедным Данте?... Глаза наворачивались слезами, но она пыталась держаться. Вся эта история, она было слишком ранимой для такой хрупкой, но одновременно и с…
🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰 🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸 🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰 🤩🤩- Но. Они собирались нас приютить ведь? Если они бы так не делали, то явно я бы не пошла с ними. Мы день назад познакомились с ними...
🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰 🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸 🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰 🤩🤩- ... Я только обрадовалась... Д-да, я встретила двух странных людей, но им можно доверять, Пик, они мне рассказали как возможно мы попали. Очень странные конечно. Мальчики говорил, что знает меня и называл меня Дельмо Хелен, очень странно... История у них очень странная и страшная... Голова опустилась в печали.
🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰 🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸 🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰 🤩🤩- Как хорошо, что ты их встретил... Что?... Улыбка с ее лица пропала и она отстранилась. 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ➖➖➖➖🌟🌟🌟➖➖➖➖ 🤩🤩- Как это... Пропал... КОГДА!?
🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰 🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸 🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰🟰 🤩🤩- Я тоже по той причине как и ты здесь находишься. Мне уже все рассказали, но не наши, я наших не встречала кроме тебя. Господи, какое счастье... 😭 Хелен подошла к родному лицу и обняла доставая ему головой только до груди, но все равно сиогоп обнять.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @XeLeN_BaRMiK. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 619,251 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Կρʙ.-𐌗ᥱ᧘ᥱн͟͟🦢” (@XeLeN_BaRMiK), 11 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/XeLeN_BaRMiK.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.