Channel
@XYKJPX
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
147subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002174314023 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @XYKJPX |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/XYKJPX |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:21 | 147 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:01 | 146 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:50 | 146 | first reading |
3 posts held, back to 11 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 3 (11 May 2026 – 25 July 2026) |
| Views total | 142 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 21:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
3 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 66.7% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 3 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 3 most recent posts we hold, published 11 May 2026 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
星燚科技｜勇往直前，连接全球 以专业为基石，以效率为承诺。 星燚科技深耕数码产品供应链，持续布局海外仓网络，让每一次交付都更加高效、稳定。 🇵🇭 菲律宾｜🇰🇭 柬埔寨 🇱🇦 老挝｜🇻🇳 越南｜🇹🇭 泰国 🇱🇰 斯里兰卡｜🇲🇾 马来西亚｜🇲🇬 马达加斯加 📦 多国仓现货供应，精选手机、电脑、办公设备、外设及数码产品。 ⚡️ 同城闪送，最快30分钟送达，让采购更省心、更高效。 星燚科技，勇往直前。 用更快的响应、更稳的供应，与每一位合作伙伴携手前行。 👍关注订阅 👍联系客服 👉电脑手机及电子产品查找浏览🐰 📱📱📱📱👍： louiskenny666 星燚科技｜手机 电脑 外设 & 数码潮品 🇵🇭 菲律宾｜🇰🇭 柬埔寨 🇱🇦 老挝｜🇻🇳 越南｜🇹🇭 泰国 🇱🇰 斯里兰卡🇲🇾 马来西亚🇲🇬马达加斯加 ⚡️ 闪送30分钟送达 闪送30分钟送达 📱📱📱📱货到付款💳 🗣关注便民信息导航咨讯
❤1
开卷有境，折叠成章 📖✨ Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 新代旗舰，从容而至 📱 合则精巧，便于随身 🎐 展则豁然，如长卷舒展，视野自成天地 🌌 性能再进一步，运算调度，迅捷而有度 ⚡️ 影像系统愈发成熟，光影之间，细节尽显 📸 Fold 之妙，在于一机兼具多重角色 既是掌中通信之器，亦可化作移动办公之境 💼 新机在手，气度自成 所见者惊艳，所用者称心 ✨ 现货在仓，数量有限 📦 先得者先享其妙，识者自会及时出手 ⏳ 👍关注订阅 👍联系客服 👉电脑手机及电子产品查找浏览🐰 📱📱📱📱👍： louiskenny666 星燚科技｜手机 电脑 外设 & 数码潮品 斯里兰卡 🇱🇰｜马来西亚🇲🇾 柬埔寨 🇰🇭｜菲律宾 🇵🇭｜泰国 🇹🇭 闪送30分钟送达 📱📱📱📱货到付款💳 🗣聚焦时事关注华人最新资讯 #三星 #ZFold7 #GalaxyZFold7 #折叠屏手机 #旗舰手机 #数码产品 #现货 #批发 #电子产品 #星燚科技
❤1💩1
折叠之间，自见天地 📖✨ Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 旗舰到位，风华尽展 📱 开合有度，方寸之间自成广阔 🌌 展开则如卷轴徐徐铺陈，观影办公，皆得从容 🎬💼 性能强劲，运转迅捷，繁复任务亦可轻松驾驭 ⚡️ 影像系统沉稳精进，光影收纳，细节俱见 📸 Fold 之妙，在于一机兼具手机与平板之长 既可掌中随行，亦可展开成境 现货在仓，数量有限 📦 先得者先享其妙，后至者且待来期 ⏳ 👍关注订阅 👍联系客服 👉电脑手机及电子产品查找浏览🐰 📱📱📱📱👍： louiskenny666 星燚科技｜手机 电脑 外设 & 数码潮品 斯里兰卡 🇱🇰｜马来西亚🇲🇾 柬埔寨 🇰🇭｜菲律宾 🇵🇭｜泰国 🇹🇭 闪送30分钟送达 📱📱📱📱货到付款💳 🗣聚焦时事关注华人最新资讯 #三星 #ZFold6 #GalaxyZFold6 #折叠屏手机 #旗舰手机 #数码产品 #现货 #批发 #电子产品 #星燚科技
Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @XYKJPX. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,002,893 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“苹果手机 · 华为手机 · 安卓手机 · 三星手机📱” (@XYKJPX), 147 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/XYKJPX.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.