星燚科技|勇往直前,连接全球 以专业为基石,以效率为承诺。 星燚科技深耕数码产品供应链,持续布局海外仓网络,让每一次交付都更加高效、稳定。 🇵🇭 菲律宾|🇰🇭 柬埔寨 🇱🇦 老挝|🇻🇳 越南|🇹🇭 泰国 🇱🇰 斯里兰卡|🇲🇾 马来西亚|🇲🇬 马达加斯加 📦 多国仓现货供应,精选手机、电脑、办公设备、外设及数码产品。 ⚡️ 同城闪送,最快30分钟送达,让采购更省心、更高效。 星燚科技,勇往直前。 用更快的响应、更稳的供应,与每一位合作伙伴携手前行。 👍关注订阅 👍联系客服 👉电脑手机及电子产品查找浏览🐰 📱📱📱📱👍: louiskenny666 星燚科技|手机 电脑 外设 & 数码潮品 🇵🇭 菲律宾|🇰🇭 柬埔寨 🇱🇦 老挝|🇻🇳 越南|🇹🇭 泰国 🇱🇰 斯里兰卡🇲🇾 马来西亚🇲🇬马达加斯加 ⚡️ 闪送30分钟送达 闪送30分钟送达 📱📱📱📱货到付款💳 🗣关注便民信息导航咨讯

Channel
Zippo 火机
@XYKJHJ
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
28subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002151457276 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @XYKJHJ |
| Description | Zippo火机货到付款 飞机:YLBXB66 微信:YLBXB66 #Zippo |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/XYKJHJ |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:46 | 28 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:33 | 28 | first reading |
Engagement
3 posts held, back to 16 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 28.6%
- avg views ÷ 28 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 8.0
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 3 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 3 (16 August 2025 – 25 July 2026) |
| Views total | 8 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 06:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 190
- Videos
- 25
- Links
- 55
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
一元既启,万象皆新。 愿新年: 所遇皆善,所行皆安; 心宽事简,福至无声; 岁岁常乐,年年无虞。 谨以此祝,同沐新光 🤓 @YLBXB66 👍:YLBXB66 🔥防骗请认准唯一客服🔥 🆒键盘大图 鼠标大图 电竞椅子 🆒美妆护肤 家电家具 Zippo火机 😀😀😀Telegram便民信息资讯 👍
Posted without readable text
Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @XYKJHJ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 574,400 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Zippo 火机” (@XYKJHJ), 28 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/XYKJHJ.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.