Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 39 days, net -35. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 820–865 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 15:00
825
-4
9 Sept 2026, 16:16
829
-11
1 Sept 2026, 02:35
840
-9
24 Aug 2026, 22:44
849
-5
16 Aug 2026, 21:35
854
-6
9 Aug 2026, 15:14
860
no change
9 Aug 2026, 13:31
860
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 15 March 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 November 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
6s
Average length
6s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
180 reactions across 17 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
74
41.1%
❤
29
16.1%
👍
14
7.78%
👏
9
5.00%
⚡
8
4.44%
🏆
8
4.44%
🙏
7
3.89%
🥰
6
3.33%
👌
5
2.78%
❤🔥
4
2.22%
🍾
3
1.67%
🎉
3
1.67%
🐳
3
1.67%
🍓
2
1.11%
💋
2
1.11%
🤯
2
1.11%
🤩
1
0.556%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 180 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 March 2023 to 2 November 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
XRP Farm: Important Announcement
Our Dapp experienced an unexpected shutdown due to the departure of our developer, which has hindered our efforts to restore its functionality. Despite our best attempts, we haven't been successful in fixing the issue.
Furthermore, our marketing wallet is slowly running out of cash, and without a significant amount to spend, it will be hard to push us in the right direction.
Also w…
Staking and Unstaking Tutorial
➡️How to stake: (re-stake)
➡️Step: 1
First you have to approve your tokens. Go to the contract page: https://bscscan.com/token/0x1a591bc628458a76d0553a8b8c57bf32d3ac150f#writeContract
Then fill in the first section
1. Fill in the staking contract: 0x094C0C2B4330353aA7928894d64d95e990860c10
2. Fill in the amount of tokens you want to stake + 18 decimals (without any , or .)
➡️S…
Good day, everyone!
We hope you're having a good week ahead.
We had some issues with our previous host that we used for the dApp, so we have now switched to a new host. Setting up this new server took a whole week, and now all the files need to be reconnected. There are a lot of files, which is causing the delay.
Everyone can still stake and unstake via bscscan, we are currently discussing some cool things interna…
✅Congratulations to all XRP holders!
🎉The judge ruled yesterday that XRP is not a security.
💵This resulted in great price action and exchange relistings.
💸XRPFARM remains the only xrp reward coin with an entire ecosystem that is here to stay and build for the long run!
▶️Read the latest blog post below:
https://xrpfarm.com/coinbase-gemini-and-kraken-to-relist-ripple-xrp/
Another XRP FARM poker tournament coming this weekend, take a seat!
🗄Date/Time: May 26th at 9PM UTC
💸 Prizes:
1st Place - XF pepe NFT + 45 XRP
2nd Place - 15 XRP
3rd Place - 15 XRP
Voice chat will be open during the event.
✍️ Register link: https://www.pokernow.club/mtt/xrpfarm-poker-IVeBIhNKWB
✅https://zealy.io/c/xrpfarm/questboard
✍️Our zealy campaign is now live.
🤜View our dashboard and you can start completing tasks.
The higher you are ranked the bigger the chance on prizes.
We will announce the exact prizes 31 may. (the more people that join and are active in the campaign the higher the prizes)
And winners will be chosen end of June!
We will be adding tasks often and will update in main chat when we…
✅Our partner Ultraboostsolutions has revealed their new upgraded website.
👉XRP farm is also featured in the client section!
👀Take a look at: https://www.ultraboostsolutions.com/clients
✅We will continue with our buy backs and burn!
✍️XRP farm is deflationary.
✅We just bought back 200k tokens.
Burn tx: https://bscscan.com/tx/0xd400fab4dfe9d9efb52bdcf24256be72b3ddb8c8fa7067e5d2c8d4fddbfc0e04
Total supply is now 99.1B
XRP Farm - staking pools have been updated!
➡️Silver pool - 60% APR
➡️Golden pool - 80% APR
➡️No lock-up period
➡️No penalty
Everything works smoothly so everyone is now able to stake their tokens in one of the pools.
Note: some visuals will be tweaked tomorrow.
Dapp: https://xrpfarm.app/stake
🚨 Staking Update! 🚨
Next week we will change the silver and the golden pool (APR Details) EVERYONE needs to unstake their tokens before then, otherwise you lose some of your rewards. (unstake when the locking period has run out for your wallet)
Date/Time: April 6 on Thursday
❤6🔥4🏆2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @XRPFarmNews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@XRPFarmNews named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@thongslounge named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“XRP Farm News” (@XRPFarmNews), 825 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/XRPFarmNews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.