Channel
@XH_Lee23
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002481352774 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @XH_Lee23 |
| Description | Chinese Journalist @XHNews. Love Travel & Photography. Views PERSONAL |
| Created | 6 March 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/XH_Lee23 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:03 | 4 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:01 | 4 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 6 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
This is such a STRONG condemnation from China. A clear signal that China doesn’t fear the confrontation with the US. “Intimidation does not scare us. Bullying does not work on us. Pressuring, coercion or threats are not the right way of dealing with China… If war is what the U.S. wants, be it a tariff war, a trade war or any other type of war, we’re ready to fight till the end.”
Chongqing is a good example of Chinese Modernization. From poverty to prosperity.
Just returned from the Great Hall of the People and heard Chinese Premier Li Qiang deliver the government work report on the spot. Li stated that China targets an economic growth rate of around 5% in 2025. I also saw Lei Jun in the hall.
This is not Switzerland. This is also Xinjiang's Altay. Ice and snow economy is booming here in this top-class skiing resort of the world.
This is 100% an industrial masterpiece of our era that such a splendidly decorated metal dragon can move at the highest speed of 450 km/h on the rail. This is China's latest marvelous CR450 high-speed train. Hope I can have a try on it ASAP.
Deepseek has Artificial Intelligence. ByteDance has TikTok. Dji has Drones. Unitree has Robots. The "Fantastic Four" proves that US's effort on suppressing China's tech rise turns nothing, and it's even a catalyst to make China move faster. I like this poster design.
China is no longer a low-cost labor-intensive market. It's climbing up the value chain and starting to lead in tech innovation. The self-driving system is very useful for rookie drivers like me in narrow blocks, especially with a huge truck coming to me.
On the air route to Lhasa, the plane needs to fly over lofty snow mountains and the weather are complex, making big difficulties. At that time, the crew members joked, "If the test flight fails, we'll ride donkeys back to Beijing." On March 1st, they successfully landed.
ASPI is not a think tank. It is an US-funded intelligence agency behind the fabrication of lies about Xinjiang.
SF Express, which has China's largest cargo aircraft fleet, recently received its 100th plane. In China, people choose SF Express when the parcels are urgent. A parcel picked up in Shenzhen at 6 pm can be delivered 1,600 km away to Beijing by noon the next day.
Channel created
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @XH_Lee23. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,184,618 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Li Zexin” (@XH_Lee23), 4 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/XH_Lee23.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.