Ребята может вернём 245?(
custom 53482568465137391272custom 54269408492399014011

Channel
@XD_DearKittens
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
239subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004406909426 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @XD_DearKittens |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 8 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/XD_DearKittens |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:18 | 239 | +1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:01 | 238 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,209 |
| Reactions total | 211 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
211 reactions across 11 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 12.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5348256846513739127 | 26 | 12.3% | |
| custom 5348289660063879924 | 22 | 10.4% | |
| custom 5346132066062852202 | 21 | 9.95% | |
| custom 5379754182452491813 | 20 | 9.48% | |
| custom 5323321743861912540 | 19 | 9.00% | |
| custom 5426940849239901401 | 17 | 8.06% | |
| custom 5454311649320141883 | 17 | 8.06% | |
| custom 5211226911367257670 | 15 | 7.11% | |
| custom 5370731117588523522 | 14 | 6.64% | |
| custom 5449366943666543715 | 9 | 4.27% | |
| custom 5298968377350435720 | 7 | 3.32% | |
| custom 5469741319330996757 | 7 | 3.32% | |
| custom 5467406098367521267 | 6 | 2.84% | |
| custom 5424670194519785856 | 4 | 1.90% | |
| custom 5357453329272152694 | 3 | 1.42% | |
| custom 5429180142108819710 | 3 | 1.42% | |
| custom 5463042467429359786 | 1 | 0.474% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 211reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @XD_DearKittens. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 August 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Ребята может вернём 245?(
custom 53482568465137391272custom 54269408492399014011
✧. ┊Дᥲʙᥲᥔᴛᥱ д᧐δьëⲙ 𝟐𝟒𝟎 ᥰ᧐дᥰᥙᥴ᧐ᴛы ᡣ𐭩⋆ 💛
custom 53482896600638799246custom 53707311175885235224
Давайте голосовать за WhiteLake🌟
custom 54493669436665437158custom 53461320660628522025custom 54269408492399014013
🤩акому клану из наших союзников и друзей мы подарим подарок?
The shares total 163%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
custom 53482568465137391275custom 53233217438619125404
𑀝ᥱᥲнᥴы ᤋᥲ 𝟏𝟏.𝟎𝟖 ᤋᥲʙᥱρɯᥱны 💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛 💛💛 I 💛💛 ᥣ᧐᥎ᥱ 𑀥ᥱᥲr𐌺iᴛᴛᥱᥒs — ᥰρᥙᥴуᴛᥴᴛʙующᥙᥱ ✧ 𐋏ᥲᥴκ𑀉᧐rɗ ─ 𐌡ᥙдᥱρ ✧ ᤁPi᥊ᥱᥣ𐌑ᥣ ─ Учᥲᥴᴛнᥙκ ✧ sᥲᥣ᧐ ─ Учᥲᥴᴛнᥙκ ✧ ᴛyrᥙsWᥲyρⲙᥲ ─ Учᥲᥴᴛнᥙκ ✧ Brysɦκᥲ ─ Учᥲᥴᴛнᥙκ 🤩 ᧐чκᥙ κ᧘ᥲнᥲ ─ 𝟐𝟐𝟕𝟗𝟎𝟓/𝟑𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎 ✼ •• ┈┈๑⋅⋯ ୨🧡୧ ⋯⋅๑┈┈ •• ✼ 「🧡」Б᧘ᥲᴦ᧐дᥲρю ʙᥴᥱ᥊ ᤋᥲ ᥰρᥙᥴуᴛᥴᴛʙᥙᥱ. Уʙᥙдᥙⲙᥴя нᥲ ᥴ᧘ᥱдующᥙ᥊ ᥴᥱᥴᥴᥙя᥊! ✨ Post creator @xAm1nda 𝗧𝗮𝗴 — #𝗦𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻 🤩🤩
custom 53482568465137391275custom 53233217438619125403custom 53707311175885235222custom 54543116493201418832custom 53461320660628522021custom 53797541824524918131custom 54269408492399014011
набор в клан открыт, по поводу вступления писать @g3eP4
custom 53797541824524918137custom 53482568465137391273custom 53574533292721526942custom 53233217438619125401custom 53707311175885235221custom 54269408492399014011
〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ 🔠🔤ᴏбᴩᴏᴦᴏ ʙᴀʍ уᴛᴩᴇчᴋᴀ! 1 дᴏ 540, ᴄʍᴏжᴇʍ?❤️ 〰️〰️〰️〰️ #𝑆ℎ𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑤
custom 53233217438619125406custom 53482568465137391274custom 53707311175885235221
𑀝ᥱᥲнᥴы ᤋᥲ 𝟎𝟗.𝟎𝟖, 𝟏𝟎.𝟎𝟖 ᤋᥲʙᥱρɯᥱны 💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛 💛💛 I 💛💛 ᥣ᧐᥎ᥱ 𑀥ᥱᥲr𐌺iᴛᴛᥱᥒs — ᥰρᥙᥴуᴛᥴᴛʙующᥙᥱ ✧ 𐋏ᥲᥴκ𑀉᧐rɗ ─ 𐌡ᥙдᥱρ ✧ ᤁPi᥊ᥱᥣ𐌑ᥣ ─ Учᥲᥴᴛнᥙκ ✧ ᥊ᥣF᧐κsiᥣ᥊ ─ Учᥲᥴᴛнᥙκ ✧ ɗqᥕᥕᥲr ─ Учᥲᥴᴛнᥙκ 🤩 ᧐чκᥙ κ᧘ᥲнᥲ ─ 𝟐𝟐𝟓𝟓𝟎𝟓/𝟑𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎 ✼ •• ┈┈๑⋅⋯ ୨🧡୧ ⋯⋅๑┈┈ •• ✼ 「🧡」Б᧘ᥲᴦ᧐дᥲρю ʙᥴᥱ᥊ ᤋᥲ ᥰρᥙᥴуᴛᥴᴛʙᥙᥱ. Уʙᥙдᥙⲙᥴя нᥲ ᥴ᧘ᥱдующᥙ᥊ ᥴᥱᥴᥴᥙя᥊! ✨ Post creator @xAm1nda 𝗧𝗮𝗴 — #𝗦𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻 🤩🤩
custom 53797541824524918136custom 54697413193309967575custom 53707311175885235224custom 52989683773504357201custom 53482568465137391271custom 53482896600638799241custom 54246701945197858561custom 54269408492399014011
「🎁」ᤋᥲκ᧘ючᥱнᥙᥱ ᥴ᧐юᤋᥲ 💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛 💛💛 I 💛💛 ᥣ᧐᥎ᥱ 𑀥ᥱᥲr𐌺iᴛᴛᥱᥒs ─── ・ 。゚⟡ 🤩 ⟡ ˚。 ・ ─── ✧ ⲙы κ ʙᥲⲙ ᥴ ᥊᧐ρ᧐ɯᥙⲙᥙ н᧐ʙ᧐ᥴᴛяⲙᥙ. Зᥲκ᧘ючᥲᥱⲙ ᥴ᧐юᤋ ᥴ ᥰρᥱκρᥲᥴныⲙ κ᧘ᥲн᧐ⲙ TɦᥱF᧐𐍃! 「🧡」𐋏ᥲдᥱᥱⲙᥴя, чᴛ᧐ нᥲɯᥙ ᧐ᴛн᧐ɯᥱнᥙя δудуᴛ ᥴᥲⲙыⲙᥙ κρᥱᥰκᥙⲙᥙ ᥙ д᧐᧘ᴦᥙⲙᥙ 👩❤️👨 「🧡」𐌑ы ᧐чᥱнь ᥴᥙ᧘ьн᧐ ᧘юδᥙⲙ ʙᥲᥴ, нᥲɯᥙ д᧐ρ᧐ᴦᥙᥱ ᴦρюнᥱндᥲ᧘ьчᥙκᥙ) 🌟 𝗣𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗰𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿 @xAm1nda 𝗧𝗮𝗴 — #𝗖𝗼𝗻𝗰𝗹𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗨𝗻𝗼𝗶𝗻 🤩🤩
custom 534828966006387992413custom 53797541824524918136custom 52989683773504357205custom 53233217438619125403custom 54269408492399014012custom 52112269113672576701custom 53707311175885235221custom 54246701945197858561
💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛 ✧. ┊δ᧐᧘ьɯ᧐ᥱ ᥴᥰᥲᥴᥙδ᧐ ᤋᥲ ᤋʙёᤋд᧐чκᥙ! Зᥲ ᥴᴛ᧐᧘ь ⲙᥲ᧘᧐ᥱ ʙρᥱⲙя ужᥱ ᥰρᥲκᴛᥙчᥱᥴκᥙ д᧐δᥙ᧘ᥙ 𝟏𝟓𝟎 ᡣ𐭩⋆ 🌟 Post creator @xAm1nda 𝗧𝗮𝗴 — #𝗦𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘀 🤩🤩
custom 521122691136725767014custom 54543116493201418837custom 53482568465137391276custom 54674060983675212673custom 53461320660628522022custom 53233217438619125401custom 53574533292721526941custom 54630424674293597861
𑀝ᥱᥲнᥴы ᤋᥲ 𝟎𝟕.𝟎𝟖, 𝟎𝟖.𝟎𝟖 ᤋᥲʙᥱρɯᥱны 💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛 💛💛 I 💛💛 ᥣ᧐᥎ᥱ 𑀥ᥱᥲr𐌺iᴛᴛᥱᥒs — ᥰρᥙᥴуᴛᥴᴛʙующᥙᥱ ✧ 𐋏ᥲᥴκ𑀉᧐rɗ ─ 𐌡ᥙдᥱρ ✧ ᤁPi᥊ᥱᥣ𐌑ᥣ ─ Учᥲᥴᴛнᥙκ ✧ ᤁ𐍃ᥙᥒfᥣ᧐ᥕᥱr ─ Учᥲᥴᴛнᥙκ ✧ ᥊ᥣF᧐κsiᥣ᥊ ─ Учᥲᥴᴛнᥙκ ✧ sᥲᥣ᧐ ─ Учᥲᥴᴛнᥙκ ✧ ɗqᥕᥕᥲr ─ Учᥲᥴᴛнᥙκ 🤩 ᧐чκᥙ κ᧘ᥲнᥲ ─ 𝟐𝟐𝟏𝟓𝟎𝟓/𝟑𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎 ✼ •• ┈┈๑⋅⋯ ୨🧡୧ ⋯⋅๑┈┈ •• ✼ 「🧡」Б᧘ᥲᴦ᧐дᥲρю ʙᥴᥱ᥊ ᤋᥲ ᥰρᥙᥴуᴛᥴᴛʙᥙᥱ. Уʙᥙдᥙⲙᥴя нᥲ ᥴ᧘ᥱдующᥙ᥊ ᥴᥱᥴᥴᥙя᥊! ✨ Post creator @xAm1nda 𝗧𝗮𝗴 — #𝗦𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻 🤩🤩
custom 534613206606285220213custom 54269408492399014018custom 54543116493201418838custom 54291801421088197103custom 54674060983675212673custom 53482896600638799242custom 54246701945197858562custom 54697413193309967572
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @XD_DearKittens. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🤩акому клану из наших союзников и друзей мы подарим подарок?
The shares total 163%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 13 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 498,627 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“⋆ 𝐷𝑒𝑎𝑟𝐾𝑖𝑡𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑠 🂱” (@XD_DearKittens), 239 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/XD_DearKittens.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.