Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝐗𝐀𝐓𝐀 𝐊𝐀𝐆𝐀𝐌𝐈

Channel

𝐗𝐀𝐓𝐀 𝐊𝐀𝐆𝐀𝐌𝐈

@XATA_KAGAMl

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

720subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001965790417
TypeChannel
Username@XATA_KAGAMl
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/XATA_KAGAMl

Growth

715724719.57 August 2026 — 715 subscribers8 August 2026 — 715 subscribers16 August 2026 — 721 subscribers23 August 2026 — 724 subscribers29 August 2026 — 720 subscribers7207 August 202629 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 22 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 714–725 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 17:03720-4
23 Aug 2026, 09:34724+3
16 Aug 2026, 06:16721+6
8 Aug 2026, 02:16715no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:53715first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
42m 18s
Average length
21m 09s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

88 reactions across 20 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53865870888733318291618.2%
custom 53234703153705852851517.0%
custom 53751357225146855011415.9%
custom 54047642580534027171314.8%
custom 51929313600035950311213.6%
66.82%
custom 519283037243756487244.55%
custom 531008614071429684922.27%
custom 528996401706908072211.14%
custom 531021810787943399211.14%
custom 536403993220352367611.14%
11.14%
❤‍🔥11.14%
🔥11.14%

Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 88 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 February 2026 to 30 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
28
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 20 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @XATA_KAGAMl. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 February 2026 to 30 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 May 2026, 15:46 UTC≈4,100 views8 reactions4 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

Kagami Взял Интервью У Старой Известной Девушки Дс Crinzhulka👼 Спойлеры 0:17 Назвала Лучшие Сервера #XIVIVIDE Anko Hatory 0:41 Назвала Худшие Сервера Moon🌙 (NGB Локалка) (SB Локалка) 1:05 Назвала Лучшие Кланы wGod ESPADA WEIDE 1:25 Назвала Худшие Кланы NZ SB P.dox 2:00 Назвала Лучших Судей Kasta Sever Ветеран Велосипед 2:10 Назвала Худших Судей Screamowner Вегас Toni 2:31 Назвала Лучших Токсиков Аджацу Fucke

custom 540476425805340271732custom 51929313600035950311custom 53100861407142968491custom 53640399322035236761

Signed Kagami

19 May 2026, 19:04 UTC≈2,220 views5 reactions4 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

Kagami Взял Интервью У Старой Известной Девушки Дс Philophobia🥺 Спойлеры 0:18 Назвала Лучшие Сервера #XIVIVIDE Hanami ARUKU 0:25 Назвала Худшие Сервера #Lounge TENDERLY Moon🌙 0:32 Назвала Лучшие Кланы wGod SB 0:39 Назвала Худшие Кланы HB FF 0:52 Назвала Лучших Судей Painful Melancholy Тревес Leavaker 1:12 Назвала Худших Судей Kin Kasta Ветеран Велосипед Gladiator 1:29 Назвала Лучших Токсиков KAZU Винокур Fine

custom 54047642580534027172custom 51928303724375648721custom 53100861407142968491custom 53102181078794339921

Signed Kagami

7 Feb 2026, 09:13 UTC≈2,770 views10 reactions11 Starsread 8 August 2026

(Реклама) Троллинг Чат В Который Нужно Зайти @officiaI_chat

custom 532347031537058528532custom 538658708887333182921🔥1custom 52899640170690807221

Signed Kagami

1 Feb 2026, 19:08 UTC≈5,230 views9 reactions9 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Результат батла: 🥇 - Derty 🙏 🥈 - Cintezz 🍑 🥉 - Takari 🤪 Finnese - стал призёром зрительских симпатий🫶 Призы выплачены Батл получился очень интересный и эмоциональный Вся запись с батла будет выложена на мой YouTube📺 https://www.youtube.com/@Kagami_Internet_fame

2custom 53234703153705852852custom 53865870888733318292custom 54047642580534027172custom 51929313600035950311

Signed Kagami

1 Feb 2026, 17:33 UTC≈2,230 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Finesse

custom 53234703153705852852

Signed Kagami

1 Feb 2026, 17:32 UTC≈2,120 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

внепланка токс

  1. Моделька34%
  2. Finesse66%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 53751357225146855012

Signed Kagami

1 Feb 2026, 17:30 UTC≈2,060 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Modelka Отдал Место Takari

custom 53751357225146855014

Signed Kagami

1 Feb 2026, 17:27 UTC≈2,040 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Кто 3

  1. Modelka35%
  2. Molitva65%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 51929313600035950312custom 53751357225146855011

Signed Kagami

1 Feb 2026, 17:24 UTC≈1,940 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Derty

custom 53234703153705852852custom 54047642580534027172

Signed Kagami

1 Feb 2026, 17:21 UTC≈1,820 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Финал

  1. Cintezz30%
  2. Derty70%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 53234703153705852852custom 53865870888733318291

Signed Kagami

1 Feb 2026, 17:20 UTC≈1,680 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Derty

custom 53865870888733318293custom 51929313600035950311

Signed Kagami

1 Feb 2026, 17:17 UTC≈1,580 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Кто

  1. Derty75%
  2. Molitva25%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 53865870888733318293custom 51928303724375648721

Signed Kagami

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @XATA_KAGAMl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Feb 2026, 17:32 UTCAnonymous Poll62 voters

внепланка токс

  1. Моделька34%
  2. Finesse66%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Feb 2026, 17:27 UTCAnonymous Poll40 voters

Кто 3

  1. Modelka35%
  2. Molitva65%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Feb 2026, 17:21 UTCAnonymous Poll37 voters

Финал

  1. Cintezz30%
  2. Derty70%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Feb 2026, 17:17 UTCAnonymous Poll36 voters

Кто

  1. Derty75%
  2. Molitva25%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Feb 2026, 17:02 UTCAnonymous Poll34 voters

Кто

  1. Cintezz68%
  2. Modelka32%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Feb 2026, 16:53 UTCAnonymous Poll42 voters

Кто

  1. Redbull62%
  2. Molitva38%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 February 2026 to 30 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐗𝐀𝐓𝐀 𝐊𝐀𝐆𝐀𝐌𝐈” (@XATA_KAGAMl), 720 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/XATA_KAGAMl.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.