Channel
@XAGinUSD
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002604519038 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @XAGinUSD |
| Created | 5 June 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/XAGinUSD |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:13 | 4 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:31 | 4 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 5 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
9 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 9 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2025 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📊 گزارش ماهانه نقره | Silver (XAG/USD) XAG/USD قیمت آغاز دوره: 58.70 قیمت پایان دوره: 56.00 تغییر ماهانه: -4.60٪ 📰 گزارش اقتصادی ماه: نقره در این دوره با کاهش 4.60٪ همراه شد و در 56.00 به پایان رسید. روند بازار فلزات گرانبها، شرایط تقاضای صنعتی و تحولات بازارهای مالی از عوامل مؤثر بر عملکرد نقره بودند. --- 📊 Monthly Report - Silver (XAG/USD) XAG/USD Period Start: 58.70 Period End: 56.00 Monthly Change: -4.60% 📰…
📊 گزارش تغییرات ماهانه نقره (XAG/USD) 📅 بازه زمانی: ۳۰ مه تا ۲۷ ژوئن 🔹 قیمت مبنا: ۷۵.۳۰ 🔹 قیمت فعلی: ۵۹.۱۴ 📉 تغییر ماهانه: ۱۶.۱۶- واحد (۲۱.۴۶٪-) 📈 وضعیت تکنیکال: - EMA 20 ماهه: ۵۵.۹۲ - MA 50 ماهه: ۴۱.۱۰ - قیمت پس از برخورد دقیق به EMA 20 ماهه (۵۵.۹۲) با حمایت این سطح مجدداً به سمت بالا بازگشته است. - قیمت همچنان بالاتر از EMA 20 و MA 50 قرار دارد که نشاندهنده حفظ ساختار صعودی در تایمفریم ماهانه است. 🔍 جمعبند…
🥈 XAG/USD | Silver Previous Close: 93.76 Current Close: 75.30 Performance: -19.69% 🇬🇧 Silver declined 19.69% during the period, falling from 93.76 to 75.30. 🇮🇷 نقره در این دوره 19.69 درصد کاهش یافت و از 93.76 به 75.30 رسید.
📊 XAG/USD — February 2026 Open (Feb 1): 85.30 Close (Feb 28): 93.76 Monthly Change: +9.90% Trend: Strong Bullish 🇺🇸 Analysis: Silver prices surged strongly in February, reflecting high market demand and USD weakness. تحلیل: قیمت نقره در فوریه افزایش چشمگیری داشت که نشاندهنده تقاضای بالا در بازار و ضعف دلار آمریکا است.
Channel name was changed to «𝑿𝑨𝑮 𝑰𝑵 𝑼𝑺𝑫»
نماد / Symbol: XAG/USD آغاز ژانویه / Start of Jan: 71.6 پایان ژانویه / End of Jan: 85.3 درصد تغییر / Monthly Change: +19.13٪ / +19.13%
📅 XAG/USD Annual Report 2025 ---------------------------------------- • XAG/USD Start of Year (1 Jan 2025): 28.8 USD/Ounce • XAG/USD End of Year (31 Dec 2025): 71.6 USD/Ounce • Annual change: ≈ +148.61% 📊 Summary: XAG/USD appreciated significantly in 2025, from 28.8 at the start to 71.6 at year-end, reflecting a massive gain of approximately 148.61%. The highest recorded value was 83.6, and the lowest was 28.5. 📅 گ…
قیمت نقره وتاریخ براساس دلار و پوندو یورو
📊 XAG/USD – تحلیل ماهانه - شروع ماهانه: 46.6 - کمترین: 45.6 - بیشترین: 54.4 - کلوز: 48.7 - تغییر ماهانه: \[ \frac{48.7 - 46.6}{46.6} \times 100 ≈ +4.51\% \] تحلیل: - نقره در این ماه حدود ۴.۵٪ رشد داشته و سقف ۵۴.۴ را لمس کرده است، اما در پایان ماه بخشی از سودها را از دست داده و به زیر ۴۹ بازگشته است. - رفتار قیمت نشاندهنده فشار فروش در نزدیکی مقاومتهای بالایی (۵۴) و احتمال فاز اصلاح کوتاهمدت است. - RSI ماهانه در …
👍2
XAG Price
𝑿𝑨𝑮 𝑰𝑵 𝑼𝑺𝑫 pinned «📣Welcome to Asset Level 📡 📊 مرکزی: @AssetLevel @OunceGroup :گروه 💬 ─────── 🔻 نمادهای تحت پوشش: 🥇 طلا(XAU) – @XAUinUSD 🥈 نقره (XAG)– @XAGinUSD ⚛️ پلاتین(XPT) – @XPTinUSD 🌪 پالادیوم(XPD) – @XPDinUSD …»
𝑿𝑨𝑮 𝑰𝑵 𝑼𝑺𝑫 pinned «📣Welcome to Asset Level 📡 📊 مرکزی: @AssetLevel @OunceGroup :گروه 💬 ─────── 🔻 نمادهای تحت پوشش: 🥇 طلا(XAU) – @XAUinUSD 🥈 نقره (XAG)– @XAGinUSD ⚛️ پلاتین(XPT) – @XPTinUSD 🌪 پالادیوم(XPD) – @XPDinUSD …»
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @XAGinUSD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝑿𝑨𝑮 𝑰𝑵 𝑼𝑺𝑫” (@XAGinUSD), 4 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/XAGinUSD.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.